This is why feminists are just masquerading luciferians. I tell a child “Don’t have sex and use a condom if you do” and that’s “shitty advice”. While your advice seems to be that they can kill their unborn child if they do have sex? That’s “shitty advice” but “shitty advice” is what I expect from luciferians
No what she’s saying is that your advice isn’t enough. Not that it’s bad advice but it doesn’t go far enough/is ineffective. Don’t have sex - great advice but unrealistic because people be people and that advice is competing with a culture that glorifies it. Use a condom - again better than nothing but the failure rate is extremely high. In states with abstinence only education and households that treat sexuality like a dirty little secret you have higher rates of teen pregnancy and higher rates of abortion as a result. The advice isn’t bad but it’s not enough and it’s misleading and unrealistic.
Men need more birth control options for themselves. Apparantly the idea of a vasectomy (the only one available to them which is actually effective) is horrifying for some reason. But they also need to actually utilize the lesser options available to them, how many men refuse a condom because it interferes with sensation? And then want to deny any and all culpability for the resulting pregnancy? More than a few. It isn’t ONLY the woman’s responsibility to prevent pregnancy but that is how it’s treated.
No one is advising or glorifying abortion. It is an option of last resort. But a necessary one unfortunately due to all the other societal/cultural conditions we currently have.
Yet no one talks about trying to fix those - which would naturally reduce abortion. Go figure.
A judge will not grant it if it is for the sole purpose of avoiding child support. And I am agreeing with you that there should be some sort of contractual agreement made early on in pregnancy between all parties that allows men to opt out as well... so I don’t understand why you keep arguing with me and being nasty.