Of course.
But first-- a correction of your dramatic misquote-- I said you approve revenge... and you do.
@Scars512 said this--
I mean, what is the difference between an all black sorority or an all white sorority? Both exclude people based on race...
Your reply...
Most of the black sororities and fraternities exist because people of color were banned from others. 'cause you know, racist people didn't want them around. It's it pointless today? Probably. But again, it was sort of unfair for blacks to be barred... So what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
The exclusion of a people, due to their race, is unfair, to be sure-- criminally so. It is understandable that those people-- or in this case, their
descendants-- may feel entitled to do the very same thing to the perpetrators of the crime-- or, rather, to their descendants. A debt of sorts has been created (as all evils do)-- it seems natural to demand payment from
someone.
What we cannot, in good conscience, say, is this is a
solution.
... what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Far from "pointless," this only gives new life to an existing evil, and perpetuates the hate that is already suffocating society.
... I want equality for people.
Really? Doesn't sound like it... revenge brings healing, progress and equality to no one-- obviously-- and society, now, testifies to this.