Not so fast... I just read a very good scholarly article on Revelation 12. Far from heretical.
https://www.raystedman.org/new-testament/revelation/woman-and-the-serpent
I don't see what this has to do with 'September 23rd'?
The prophecy is written and certainly I believe in it too.
We know Paul equated the law of God to 'slavery' and to Ismael.
He equated the Grace of God to being a 'son' and a child of grace like Isaac.
Now most people do not really understand this theme and what it refers to.
In islam, other than the state of jahilliya (ignorance/evil) there is a state of faith called islam and another state which is even higher called Ihsan.
Islam=submission to the will of God. This state brings us into the perfection of duality between Creator/Creation ie we become submitted to His Will and this is what being a 'slave of God' means. Int his state we are conscious of our self and God.
Ihsan=unity with God. Contrary to what people may assume it doesn't mean you become God but your consciousness loses sight of all 'else than God'. In this state the person perceives all things as God's act and loses him/herself in the experience...this is the real meaning of being a 'son of God' as the NT teaches. This is the state Jesus was obviously preaching. I have said it many times before but these 2 states are the path of 'right action' and the path of 'non-action' (where non-action symolises non-attachment to the fruits of action).
How is this relevant to Revelation 12?
the woman does represent Sarah and her offspring Israel. Her being taken into the wilderness to escape from the serpent basically symbolises how the israelites were given the law of God through Moses. The patriarchs were under the grace of God ie they were in a higher state of consciousness (Ihsan) but eventually the israelites were without guidance, became enslaved in egypt etc and so they were given the law of Moses until Jesus came.
Revelation's prophecies are post-Jesus prophecies ie what is seen here is what occurs in the future. Here the woman is taken into the wilderness
6 The woman fled into the wilderness to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days.
if you study history, the romans/ CHRISTIANS persecuted the jews and they fled roman rule, they went all over the place but many settled in the arabia.
13 When the dragon saw that he had been hurled to the earth, he pursued the woman who had given birth to the male child. 14 The woman was given the two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the wilderness, where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent’s reach.
Here I just want to illustrate a point about potential bloodlines, example
Prophet Mohammad SAW was survived by 1 daughter who passed away only 6 months after him, she was survived by 2 sons who also were martyted not long later...yet there are literally millions of descendants from this line in the world today.
There are more 'syeds' (the bloodline) in the world than there are jews in the world.
Similarly, the line of bani kalb (an arab who lived in the time of the Prophet SAW) has millions of descendants today in sham (syria/iraq) and it's the same for many of the sahaba (those who associated with the Prophet directl who have descendants all over the world, well known bloodlines).
How many arab muslims today descend from jewish converts in the time of Prophet Mohammad? God knows.
Why am I specifically referring to jewish converts?
Think this through for a moment
all the apostles were jewish.
jewish, yet christian.
did them becoming christian negate their jewishness?
in fact bloodline alone doesn't make one a jew which we learn in the NT. A real 'son' is one who shares the same spirituality as the father ie sons of Abraham being those who share in his qualities/faith rather than mere bloodline.
I should also add, the woman represents all of israel inc the lost tribes so there's that element too.
This specific prophecy refers to the wilderness and connects with islam (which as ive explained is a theme connected to the path of right-action, submission, to being a 'slave' like Ismael, connected with the wilderness etc).
Revelation 12 ends with
17 Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring—those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus.
don't even try telling me this refers to some christian church because christians do not follow commandments, they have no connection to the wilderness theme which also connects with the 40 years in the wilderness story/moses.
Basically these are people who believe in the testimony of Jesus..but follow commandments
messianic jews......or muslims.
"so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the wilderness, where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent’s reach"
obviously this cannot refer to messianic jews who are european/russian stock.
it says 'out of the serpents reach' BUT we know the serpent (satan) is directly connected with the anti-christ/BEAST system. We already know Rome is the beast system and we know rome=europe. So again, there is zero chance this refers to messianic jews or the modern european israeli jew.
the european israeli jew is the fulfillment of mystery babylon...remember 'the whore who sits on the beast'
get it?
jews controlling white/colonial nations.
"
where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent’s reach"
the 1260 days/3.5 years is relevant if you connect Revelation 11's witness to islam.
(for anyone who doesn't know, here a day symbolises a year) ie 1260 years (although these years are based on the jewish lunar year).
Basically the arab world was a safe zone from the beast system until eventually the arab world got conquered and colonised at the turn of the last century
and we already know how that tied in with the establishment of house saud (satanic) and zionist movement.
1260 lunar/jewish years from Umar's conquest of jerusalem takes us to the late 19th century/early 20th century
i reckon the palestinians are more legitimate bloodline jews/israelites than the ashkenazis.
bit random but this is a commonly shared view
"More recently, Israeli Rabbi Dov Stein offered his own estimate that up to 85 percent of Palestinians on the west side of the Jordan River are descended from Jews."
https://shavei.org/palestinians-jewish-roots/