So anyone on here a subject of trauma abuse?
- Thread starter CALIBAN
- Start date
Vixy
Star
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 3,907
Do you know which sort of programming you had and why? Do you think this board is under surveillance? (Could be a dumd question since I take it they are surveilling everything) How close do you think we are to the antichrist coming? Would you like to elaborate on what they did to you in a way that wouldnt give up your identity?
I think that those who think this is only done to celebrities are far off on their education on this. MK programming isnt only for celebs but for "sleeping soldiers" and much more. The use is seems only limited by fantasy and needs. You have all those Scorpio programming soldiers in "sleep mode" and women acting call girls if they would need a beautiful woman to make a high ranked person in their way, go down. So "The long kiss goodnight" with geena Davis makes sense. Its exxagerated since I doubt one single female would take on a resistance like that, she'd have tons of back-up, but Bsmaller actions like blackmailing is very common. I suspect thats what happened to Rob Lowe. Tons and tons of celebrities have planned on going out public with whats happening but are stopped or are taken for mental patients due to what theyre saying sounds so off for the regular Joe that they just cant take it seriously but we all, on this board, know that these things are real so I hope noone on here will mock you.
I think that those who think this is only done to celebrities are far off on their education on this. MK programming isnt only for celebs but for "sleeping soldiers" and much more. The use is seems only limited by fantasy and needs. You have all those Scorpio programming soldiers in "sleep mode" and women acting call girls if they would need a beautiful woman to make a high ranked person in their way, go down. So "The long kiss goodnight" with geena Davis makes sense. Its exxagerated since I doubt one single female would take on a resistance like that, she'd have tons of back-up, but Bsmaller actions like blackmailing is very common. I suspect thats what happened to Rob Lowe. Tons and tons of celebrities have planned on going out public with whats happening but are stopped or are taken for mental patients due to what theyre saying sounds so off for the regular Joe that they just cant take it seriously but we all, on this board, know that these things are real so I hope noone on here will mock you.
Last edited:
Well my case is unique - but then again - i suppose every case is. The techniques that are used have developed over time. I mean some of them are based on things that are just innate to the world we live - sex, identity and death. Others, like the internet are more modern tools. This is under surveillance because everything on the internet is under surveillance - the internet is almost like an 'ideal' in itself - as it's supposed to be 'free' - yet at the same time it's owned by a few oligarchal companies - and at the same time bulk data collection by agencies is well known. Many aspects of it - including pornography and privacy have been weaponised for propaganda purposes through the use of 'bad law'. There are news stories that have been created from the ECHR that British surveillance capabilities are 'illegal'. Of course, data collection is one of those inconvenient truths - it's never actually going to go away. Yet it's being used as propaganda for withering of the state, in a way, you could say that law in itself has always at the highest level been owned by the aristocracy (French Revolution aside).
But - the use of surveillance has a darker side to it - for a start it can be done monomaniacally and in real time - in other words weaponised to an extent - stalking - and by people who you would not expect to be able to do that. There's a concept of plausible deniability combined with hiding in plain sight - which is just a way to use power - which is justifiable in realpolitik - combinations of big lies and little lies until the truth becomes more controllable.
It's well documented that in East Germany - the Stasi (state security) - used similar techniques. It was supposed to be a way of using soft power to control so called dissidents without the general populace noticing the brutal reality they were living in (in reality - the victims ended up being anyone they wanted to - fog of war type reality). Although - when your talking about techniques such as gaslighting (making people question their sanity), anonymised stalking, and sometimes just plain intimidation, threats, and using state powers to cause harm such as forcing out of work, deportation, and ruining peoples reputation to the point that they suffered psychological harm, wouldn't be believed and perceived to have deserved it, and often committed suicide - these things could just be part of historical life under what we now call bullying. And at the end of the day - states use hard power - war, genocide and assassination all the time.
One problem was - if a person realised what was happening to them - and could reasonably prove and articulate it - there would have been a backlash against the establishment - in any case they would not have been able to be prosecuted for any crimes they committed in a public trial because of the compromising information they had on the state. This is similar to how Mafia groups operate - you know - what they call 'Made Men'. The United States and several world Super Powers, have been built upon groups that resemble the Mafia. That is they are highly structured, and operate in ways that evade conventional law. And that is basically the environment that all Intelligence Agencies operate in. But, the philosophy behind it is reasonably justifiable - because global cooperation between people and the establishment of institutions such as the UN or world banking systems is a positive ideal. In the case of these Stasi victims - some were deported, some were recruited, others were imprisoned, sectioned or assassinated.
You saw a similar kind of thing during McCarthyism and the red purge in the USA. People were blacklisted, had public reputations ruined, and I'm sure in many cases simply assassinated. Elsewhere, in West Germany, for example - militant groups were fostered for political intent. So, it's nothing entirely new, and once those things have been done once, it's almost easier to continue to do them. In fact, as a historian and sociologist, it's said that every person who dies in the world either through poverty, disease, or conflict is a responsibility of those with power. So at the highest levels of power, assassinations are not simply a threat or a fact of life, but a justifiable intervention, as well as wet ops, dark ops, and false flag terrorism. I mean, how many countries have had the death penalty.
As I say, my case is in many ways unique - but then again i suppose every case is - because I am an 'internet user' (I don't really have much choice as I'm stuck in my parents bedroom, isolated and a fairly easy target for this kind of thing). The internet has taken the whole 'spy game' thing to a different arena. Some things that would have been impossible for intelligence agencies to do are now possible - and of course - almost more plausibly deniable if that's actually needed - as one thing that I admit does confuse me slightly about me case is that it's not deniable if would anyone see my internet records. So if anyone can see my internet records - I have contacted various intelligence and federal agencies who surely have that ability - they would have already seen what's been done. It's not my intent to embarrass anyone, though, that is why I think they have not replied to me directly, as it would potentially embarrass not only them but powerful people in the world. So at the moment, a lot of the messages are a kind of 'shut up' type of message. I'm not quite sure how as it's gone so far, I've already contacted agencies, given away some of my identity on facebook to relatively few friends, and there's my internet history.
So - a lot of that would have simply waffle for most educated people - probably far more educated than myself.
So here - I will divulge some of the methodology behind my personal 'trauma abuse' and maybe eventually get to how it began and why I am a target - as I'm not entirely innocent.
TBC - as I write the next post...
But - the use of surveillance has a darker side to it - for a start it can be done monomaniacally and in real time - in other words weaponised to an extent - stalking - and by people who you would not expect to be able to do that. There's a concept of plausible deniability combined with hiding in plain sight - which is just a way to use power - which is justifiable in realpolitik - combinations of big lies and little lies until the truth becomes more controllable.
It's well documented that in East Germany - the Stasi (state security) - used similar techniques. It was supposed to be a way of using soft power to control so called dissidents without the general populace noticing the brutal reality they were living in (in reality - the victims ended up being anyone they wanted to - fog of war type reality). Although - when your talking about techniques such as gaslighting (making people question their sanity), anonymised stalking, and sometimes just plain intimidation, threats, and using state powers to cause harm such as forcing out of work, deportation, and ruining peoples reputation to the point that they suffered psychological harm, wouldn't be believed and perceived to have deserved it, and often committed suicide - these things could just be part of historical life under what we now call bullying. And at the end of the day - states use hard power - war, genocide and assassination all the time.
One problem was - if a person realised what was happening to them - and could reasonably prove and articulate it - there would have been a backlash against the establishment - in any case they would not have been able to be prosecuted for any crimes they committed in a public trial because of the compromising information they had on the state. This is similar to how Mafia groups operate - you know - what they call 'Made Men'. The United States and several world Super Powers, have been built upon groups that resemble the Mafia. That is they are highly structured, and operate in ways that evade conventional law. And that is basically the environment that all Intelligence Agencies operate in. But, the philosophy behind it is reasonably justifiable - because global cooperation between people and the establishment of institutions such as the UN or world banking systems is a positive ideal. In the case of these Stasi victims - some were deported, some were recruited, others were imprisoned, sectioned or assassinated.
You saw a similar kind of thing during McCarthyism and the red purge in the USA. People were blacklisted, had public reputations ruined, and I'm sure in many cases simply assassinated. Elsewhere, in West Germany, for example - militant groups were fostered for political intent. So, it's nothing entirely new, and once those things have been done once, it's almost easier to continue to do them. In fact, as a historian and sociologist, it's said that every person who dies in the world either through poverty, disease, or conflict is a responsibility of those with power. So at the highest levels of power, assassinations are not simply a threat or a fact of life, but a justifiable intervention, as well as wet ops, dark ops, and false flag terrorism. I mean, how many countries have had the death penalty.
As I say, my case is in many ways unique - but then again i suppose every case is - because I am an 'internet user' (I don't really have much choice as I'm stuck in my parents bedroom, isolated and a fairly easy target for this kind of thing). The internet has taken the whole 'spy game' thing to a different arena. Some things that would have been impossible for intelligence agencies to do are now possible - and of course - almost more plausibly deniable if that's actually needed - as one thing that I admit does confuse me slightly about me case is that it's not deniable if would anyone see my internet records. So if anyone can see my internet records - I have contacted various intelligence and federal agencies who surely have that ability - they would have already seen what's been done. It's not my intent to embarrass anyone, though, that is why I think they have not replied to me directly, as it would potentially embarrass not only them but powerful people in the world. So at the moment, a lot of the messages are a kind of 'shut up' type of message. I'm not quite sure how as it's gone so far, I've already contacted agencies, given away some of my identity on facebook to relatively few friends, and there's my internet history.
So - a lot of that would have simply waffle for most educated people - probably far more educated than myself.
So here - I will divulge some of the methodology behind my personal 'trauma abuse' and maybe eventually get to how it began and why I am a target - as I'm not entirely innocent.
TBC - as I write the next post...
Last edited:
Before I get to that - I'd like to say - sorry for the political waffle - and speaking of the death penalty - as I know there are brutal regimes in place throughout the world to this day. And unless I've been tied down, subjected to buggery, and shocked with a cattle prong it might not be so interesting - but I will type the next post shortly...
Vixy
Star
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 3,907
Well the bullying by state officials doesnt surprise me one bit, just lok at society today; The left wing bullying the right until they turn over. Its evil madness!
As far as chasing someone out of their hometown, you're right. Someone I knre briefly had that done to him, "a political refugee" if you will. XX was one of many protesters of the political system back im xx homecountry and when protesting the government officialls walked around with cameras, recording the faces of all of them and then started to find out who they were and where they lived. One of them was asked about and then found and beaten almost to death. When they started asking about my friend, xx left the country, knowing what would come. XX's firm, economy, family, was all destroyed and he is now elsewhere as a refugee. I doubt xx will ever be able to regain what xx had. And all bc xx protested against the unjustice in the system.
But all of these things are known, I'd like to know more about what isnt known. I've heard they use mk teqchniques like VR reality, which is supposed to be the worst since they can program anything into your mind by that plus can make up any horrible scenario though possible?
it's said that every person who dies in the world either through poverty, disease, or conflict is a responsibility of those with power.
Funny, I was thinking this myself just yesterday. With the technology and knowledge they have, they could erase poverty, heal everyone of almost everything and we could live in a MUCH better world than now, However they chose the evil side and well..here we are. I see every day refugees fleeing from the wars they've started, people being very very sick and so on and I know whats behind it but try telling that to the average Joe. Thats why these forums are so important. One gets to TALK to those who knows! When they shut down the internet, I will miss this gravely...if there'll be any time to miss anything, that is.
Ofc the authorities would not respond to you, brushing it off with someone trolling or being mentally unstable as usual.
This will be an interesting read!
As far as chasing someone out of their hometown, you're right. Someone I knre briefly had that done to him, "a political refugee" if you will. XX was one of many protesters of the political system back im xx homecountry and when protesting the government officialls walked around with cameras, recording the faces of all of them and then started to find out who they were and where they lived. One of them was asked about and then found and beaten almost to death. When they started asking about my friend, xx left the country, knowing what would come. XX's firm, economy, family, was all destroyed and he is now elsewhere as a refugee. I doubt xx will ever be able to regain what xx had. And all bc xx protested against the unjustice in the system.
But all of these things are known, I'd like to know more about what isnt known. I've heard they use mk teqchniques like VR reality, which is supposed to be the worst since they can program anything into your mind by that plus can make up any horrible scenario though possible?
it's said that every person who dies in the world either through poverty, disease, or conflict is a responsibility of those with power.
Funny, I was thinking this myself just yesterday. With the technology and knowledge they have, they could erase poverty, heal everyone of almost everything and we could live in a MUCH better world than now, However they chose the evil side and well..here we are. I see every day refugees fleeing from the wars they've started, people being very very sick and so on and I know whats behind it but try telling that to the average Joe. Thats why these forums are so important. One gets to TALK to those who knows! When they shut down the internet, I will miss this gravely...if there'll be any time to miss anything, that is.
Ofc the authorities would not respond to you, brushing it off with someone trolling or being mentally unstable as usual.
This will be an interesting read!
Aero
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 5,910
Trauma is a natural part of life.
It's really all about if there was a purpose to that trauma or not. And that's difficult to figure out. What I'm saying is there is so much trauma going around that the public couldn't ever collectively know. Plus people think it's a joke. So we might have already turned into a world full of sadists.
My minds not in a dark place or anything. I'm just trying to be realistic. Humans aren't naturally inclined to be compassionate. It's not the cool thing to do. Now some may argue that we have pathological issues, but I disagree. In these type of cases, I think we are dealing with social constructs.
Personalities have gone awry. And I think everyone has alter-egos. They just aren't smart enough to realize it. Also, that type of information is generally suppressed. So how would the average individual get even the slightest clue? They wouldn't! Duh. It's not rocket science to withhold information.
It's really all about if there was a purpose to that trauma or not. And that's difficult to figure out. What I'm saying is there is so much trauma going around that the public couldn't ever collectively know. Plus people think it's a joke. So we might have already turned into a world full of sadists.
My minds not in a dark place or anything. I'm just trying to be realistic. Humans aren't naturally inclined to be compassionate. It's not the cool thing to do. Now some may argue that we have pathological issues, but I disagree. In these type of cases, I think we are dealing with social constructs.
Personalities have gone awry. And I think everyone has alter-egos. They just aren't smart enough to realize it. Also, that type of information is generally suppressed. So how would the average individual get even the slightest clue? They wouldn't! Duh. It's not rocket science to withhold information.
So it's probably best to at least try to define some of the terms such as 'trauma' 'abuse' and 'torture'.
Trauma I believe to have originated from modern psychology - I mean, you could now say having a bad meal or simply something you don't like is 'traumatic'. You don't for example, see tribal cultures, complain of 'trauma'. Aztecs would have simply gathered together, blew their death whistle, and charged forth. If you was a caveman, and you lived next to a volcano, you would move cave when you realised it was going to blow. The Romans got wiped out in part by a volcano, but they also developed exceptional techniques of war; spectacular formations that would outsmart a pride of lions and still permeate modern politics. Yet, even before them, the Greeks had invented clandestine warfare and used the gift of storytelling to delineate opponents. You didn't not hear in troops from the last centuries great wars complaints of PTSD, yet it has entered common parlance.
I believe that psychology being able to identify such conditions is partly why it has been weaponised. There's loads of military intelligence officers on twitter that complain of PTSD, same for news stories of other departments such as online child exploitation, where they are in a system where they have to view graphic imagery, navigate missiles, and manage high emotions. Now imagine your the boss, or in any position of power, the weight on your neck is going to give you some idea the damage trauma can do, its impact on health, and also the balance between that and simply war. The neuroscience of it is also well understood. Because of the repetitive aspect of doing that kind of work, it builds up into a kind of insidious, pernicious trauma. You hear it described as CPTSD. And in the right circumstances and without an appropriate framework it can be debilitating, and essentially destroy a person. So, therefore you have a weapon, and it's used at macro levels from big world events, to more surprisingly, targeted micro levels. And the best of all, you do not even have to have physical contact with a person to be able to subject them to huge and highly reckoned trauma.
Abuse is something you might think would be covered by law. I mean there are all kinds of laws governing different kinds of abuse, including non physical abuse. It usually consists of a perpetrator/victim situation. It would be very rare for the victim to be in a position of greater power than the perpetrator. In the case of state, if all the people banded together, hoping for some kind of revolution, they could probably give it a good shot, and in all likelihood result in violence. So in order to assert itself, for the public interest, people are banded together into different groups, itself a kind of abuse, at the deepest level, however, what's known a necessary abuse, to the extent of several countries seeing militia groups. The same happens on the internet; hives are created, opinions are manipulated, and content is given some extent of control. You could not adequately claim in a court of law that is an abuse of person, as it justified in the public interest, a far less of an public abuse than a militia group. Yet, when it becomes directed at an individual, a different criteria exists, that you would expect to be covered by law, except that it doesn't, because it can be classified as public interest.
Torture is generally thought of again as a physical thing, or even on a spiritual or metaphysical level, a fact of life. In the film Sansho the Baliff, the poor woman sings 'Isn't life torture'. Actions of torture are another historical component of war and usually consist of a combination of physical harm combined with psychological manipulation. Generally, I would say that abuse combined with threat is enough to consist torture. So you could say, simply having to do things you don't want to do otherwise you'd die, and you probably will anyway, is what makes life a spiritual torture for people.
What it's said that is done in torture camps and black sites, the prisoner is stripped naked, often sexually humiliated, subject to sensory deprivation, and in many cases having a phallic device inserted into their anus. The justification; perceived threat. And also, in various regimes a political prisoner may be tortured in more gruesome ways, removal of limbs, stress positions and to the point of death. That's an easily perceivable and generally undeniable reality.
What I will get to in my next post (after i read your replies) is a more subtle and arcane form of torture.
It has been referred to as Non Touch Torture.
Trauma I believe to have originated from modern psychology - I mean, you could now say having a bad meal or simply something you don't like is 'traumatic'. You don't for example, see tribal cultures, complain of 'trauma'. Aztecs would have simply gathered together, blew their death whistle, and charged forth. If you was a caveman, and you lived next to a volcano, you would move cave when you realised it was going to blow. The Romans got wiped out in part by a volcano, but they also developed exceptional techniques of war; spectacular formations that would outsmart a pride of lions and still permeate modern politics. Yet, even before them, the Greeks had invented clandestine warfare and used the gift of storytelling to delineate opponents. You didn't not hear in troops from the last centuries great wars complaints of PTSD, yet it has entered common parlance.
I believe that psychology being able to identify such conditions is partly why it has been weaponised. There's loads of military intelligence officers on twitter that complain of PTSD, same for news stories of other departments such as online child exploitation, where they are in a system where they have to view graphic imagery, navigate missiles, and manage high emotions. Now imagine your the boss, or in any position of power, the weight on your neck is going to give you some idea the damage trauma can do, its impact on health, and also the balance between that and simply war. The neuroscience of it is also well understood. Because of the repetitive aspect of doing that kind of work, it builds up into a kind of insidious, pernicious trauma. You hear it described as CPTSD. And in the right circumstances and without an appropriate framework it can be debilitating, and essentially destroy a person. So, therefore you have a weapon, and it's used at macro levels from big world events, to more surprisingly, targeted micro levels. And the best of all, you do not even have to have physical contact with a person to be able to subject them to huge and highly reckoned trauma.
Abuse is something you might think would be covered by law. I mean there are all kinds of laws governing different kinds of abuse, including non physical abuse. It usually consists of a perpetrator/victim situation. It would be very rare for the victim to be in a position of greater power than the perpetrator. In the case of state, if all the people banded together, hoping for some kind of revolution, they could probably give it a good shot, and in all likelihood result in violence. So in order to assert itself, for the public interest, people are banded together into different groups, itself a kind of abuse, at the deepest level, however, what's known a necessary abuse, to the extent of several countries seeing militia groups. The same happens on the internet; hives are created, opinions are manipulated, and content is given some extent of control. You could not adequately claim in a court of law that is an abuse of person, as it justified in the public interest, a far less of an public abuse than a militia group. Yet, when it becomes directed at an individual, a different criteria exists, that you would expect to be covered by law, except that it doesn't, because it can be classified as public interest.
Torture is generally thought of again as a physical thing, or even on a spiritual or metaphysical level, a fact of life. In the film Sansho the Baliff, the poor woman sings 'Isn't life torture'. Actions of torture are another historical component of war and usually consist of a combination of physical harm combined with psychological manipulation. Generally, I would say that abuse combined with threat is enough to consist torture. So you could say, simply having to do things you don't want to do otherwise you'd die, and you probably will anyway, is what makes life a spiritual torture for people.
What it's said that is done in torture camps and black sites, the prisoner is stripped naked, often sexually humiliated, subject to sensory deprivation, and in many cases having a phallic device inserted into their anus. The justification; perceived threat. And also, in various regimes a political prisoner may be tortured in more gruesome ways, removal of limbs, stress positions and to the point of death. That's an easily perceivable and generally undeniable reality.
What I will get to in my next post (after i read your replies) is a more subtle and arcane form of torture.
It has been referred to as Non Touch Torture.
Vixy
Star
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 3,907
Completely disagree!
Humans arent naturally sadistic or evil, that comes when something is wrong. We are naturally kind people but choices to act badly, makes us evil. Choices or disease of the brain.
A natural state of an alter ego I have NEVER heard of and Iäve been around for some time. So this sounds like darwinistic dribble to me. We arent born evil and evil isnt natural. Whats natural is to help others and be a kind person if in your right mind. But of course..Those whom are evil likes to make it sound like its natural to make themselves feel better about it.
There is however no such way. Evil is evil, good is good.
So here goes some of the method of my non touch torture.
1) Internet. I'm a daily internet user. I've used it since childhood. I don't have much choice in the matter at the moment. Actually, I quite liked using it and learned a lot of from using it. I have to use it to find locations I will be working at. I don't have much choice at the moment to not be plugged into this machine due to being increasingly unable to sustain myself financially, being increasingly isolated at my parents house, and never having often used social media very much if at all.
So to talk about surveillance - not only is everything recorded - something i've always been aware of, at least subconsciously before the Snowdon revelations - it is also being used for real time surveillance, and not just by single teams of tech groups hiding away at GCHQ or NSA trying to deal with subjects of actual interest (reality is everyone is a suspect) - but by well known online newspapers. Including one of my favourites due to its boisterous headlines and comment section. I won't name it or any further details of the one particular paper but it is well known.
So - not only am I virtually trapped in isolation in front of a computer screen for most of my downtime - for about 3 or 4 years now - I have been actively surveilled every minute of the day. See, it sounds like madness already, as nobody would take interest in me to that extent, let alone anyone else.
Simply being watched in what I do is a mild annoyance. I don't mean being recorded, as though it is stored away and could be read and possibly interpreted and used against me at a later date. That's called a kind of panopticisation. Which you might assume adequate and responsible agencies would be behind. What I'm talking about is being sat at your computer screen and at the other end you have what must be several people, many unidentified, the others manic in some ways, watching you and also setting out to shock you with how fast they are at watching what you do.
How do you know you are being watched, you might ask?
One of the ways is because as a newspaper it also has an editorial. That means that the news stories can be framed in different ways. Either by moving the article around a page, arranging the articles in a way to create insinuations, or delivering a hidden message - in effect communicating.
So here a construction has been established - interaction between one party and another - myself and a news team.
At first, I thought... this is a little bit odd!
This website (an online newspaper) appears to know what I'm doing online - what I search for - what porn I'm looking at.
So you've kind of already entered into some kind of relationship. And you become intrigued. The website is interactive!... Even when you don't want it to be.
What's the problem you might ask - don't read the site if you decide you no longer like it!
However, I already knew this was not the first website I had used that had given me such results. I say knew, but I mean I had in the back of my mind that there was something sinister lurking from what are termed synchronicities. I know there are educated people on here who will understand what I mean by synchronicities. The way that I mean it is that you do something and a 'coincidence' happens. So the first few times it happens, it doesn't consciously register. I'd just done something totally innocuous online - it was to do with talking about movies on a forum - and then a real world event happens.
So step by step, coincidence after coincidence, you are thrown slightly off balance, enough to sow the remotest seeds of doubt in your mind. Remember, this was way before the news site hacking surveillance.
So then, after having a fairly hard time being bullied at work and leaving that job. I'm reading this paper online. Joining in with the comments section. Then a major false flag terror attack happens. BOOM. Consciousness shattered. The slow unraveling of my senses had become... oh damn oh damn. All the things that happened before I started to doubt (things that would have been highly traumatic to imagine to have been true). Not only that, but it meant I was being actively watched - those private sexual chats I was having online were being watched. I didn't really care too much about that immediately as I thought - if someone is going to be watching it - they're going to competent people who wouldn't dare to use it for abusive or harassment purposes! Yeh right!
So after being totally shocked by this false flag terror event (for various reasons - the fact I might have caused it by what I said online - the fact I might be confused for a radical - and maybe more selfishly the impact that it would have on the city I live and grew up in) and also the fact that it meant the other coincidences I'd witnessed might have true, the fact that someone might be able to accuse that there's something wrong about me sexually. I was watching it with interest on the TV and online as half of the world probably were, then the next day I search for something online or make a comment - and there's a fake event created that shows that damn, is it me? is it me? Really kind of gaslighting.
I remember what is was I did online the day after that attack - and how the article I read about the attacks corresponded to it yet still only in a slightly vague way.
Now from this so far - you might be thinking various things - I did something to deserve it. Or it's not that bad you only read it. Or that I simply imagined it...
TBC...
1) Internet. I'm a daily internet user. I've used it since childhood. I don't have much choice in the matter at the moment. Actually, I quite liked using it and learned a lot of from using it. I have to use it to find locations I will be working at. I don't have much choice at the moment to not be plugged into this machine due to being increasingly unable to sustain myself financially, being increasingly isolated at my parents house, and never having often used social media very much if at all.
So to talk about surveillance - not only is everything recorded - something i've always been aware of, at least subconsciously before the Snowdon revelations - it is also being used for real time surveillance, and not just by single teams of tech groups hiding away at GCHQ or NSA trying to deal with subjects of actual interest (reality is everyone is a suspect) - but by well known online newspapers. Including one of my favourites due to its boisterous headlines and comment section. I won't name it or any further details of the one particular paper but it is well known.
So - not only am I virtually trapped in isolation in front of a computer screen for most of my downtime - for about 3 or 4 years now - I have been actively surveilled every minute of the day. See, it sounds like madness already, as nobody would take interest in me to that extent, let alone anyone else.
Simply being watched in what I do is a mild annoyance. I don't mean being recorded, as though it is stored away and could be read and possibly interpreted and used against me at a later date. That's called a kind of panopticisation. Which you might assume adequate and responsible agencies would be behind. What I'm talking about is being sat at your computer screen and at the other end you have what must be several people, many unidentified, the others manic in some ways, watching you and also setting out to shock you with how fast they are at watching what you do.
How do you know you are being watched, you might ask?
One of the ways is because as a newspaper it also has an editorial. That means that the news stories can be framed in different ways. Either by moving the article around a page, arranging the articles in a way to create insinuations, or delivering a hidden message - in effect communicating.
So here a construction has been established - interaction between one party and another - myself and a news team.
At first, I thought... this is a little bit odd!
This website (an online newspaper) appears to know what I'm doing online - what I search for - what porn I'm looking at.
So you've kind of already entered into some kind of relationship. And you become intrigued. The website is interactive!... Even when you don't want it to be.
What's the problem you might ask - don't read the site if you decide you no longer like it!
However, I already knew this was not the first website I had used that had given me such results. I say knew, but I mean I had in the back of my mind that there was something sinister lurking from what are termed synchronicities. I know there are educated people on here who will understand what I mean by synchronicities. The way that I mean it is that you do something and a 'coincidence' happens. So the first few times it happens, it doesn't consciously register. I'd just done something totally innocuous online - it was to do with talking about movies on a forum - and then a real world event happens.
So step by step, coincidence after coincidence, you are thrown slightly off balance, enough to sow the remotest seeds of doubt in your mind. Remember, this was way before the news site hacking surveillance.
So then, after having a fairly hard time being bullied at work and leaving that job. I'm reading this paper online. Joining in with the comments section. Then a major false flag terror attack happens. BOOM. Consciousness shattered. The slow unraveling of my senses had become... oh damn oh damn. All the things that happened before I started to doubt (things that would have been highly traumatic to imagine to have been true). Not only that, but it meant I was being actively watched - those private sexual chats I was having online were being watched. I didn't really care too much about that immediately as I thought - if someone is going to be watching it - they're going to competent people who wouldn't dare to use it for abusive or harassment purposes! Yeh right!
So after being totally shocked by this false flag terror event (for various reasons - the fact I might have caused it by what I said online - the fact I might be confused for a radical - and maybe more selfishly the impact that it would have on the city I live and grew up in) and also the fact that it meant the other coincidences I'd witnessed might have true, the fact that someone might be able to accuse that there's something wrong about me sexually. I was watching it with interest on the TV and online as half of the world probably were, then the next day I search for something online or make a comment - and there's a fake event created that shows that damn, is it me? is it me? Really kind of gaslighting.
I remember what is was I did online the day after that attack - and how the article I read about the attacks corresponded to it yet still only in a slightly vague way.
Now from this so far - you might be thinking various things - I did something to deserve it. Or it's not that bad you only read it. Or that I simply imagined it...
TBC...
Last edited:
rainerann
Star
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2017
- Messages
- 4,550
So what you are saying is that you feel that you have been targeted? Have you ever heard of the term targeted individual before?
Your response to this is interesting. Was it different at one point? What I mean is, did you at some point consider whether you had psychic abilities when you started noticing these synchronicities?
Your response to this is interesting. Was it different at one point? What I mean is, did you at some point consider whether you had psychic abilities when you started noticing these synchronicities?
You know it's quite funny you ask about the psychic abilities. And to talk about what are synchronicities - by what I mean - I do something online - search for something - make a comment on a forum and something happens. Towards the start of when I started to realise what was going on (it's quite out of what I would have expected from normal internet use) I actually googled things like "what to do if you think you're psychic" just to humour the people watching me and doing things based on my behaviour.
It's targeted individual - but I think if I ever gave the full details of how I've been targeted - I might very well be the most targeted individual in history, for this method of targeting at least.
So before I continue...
Describing the initial psychological paradigm shift.
Why was this event so traumatic? After all, people witness real bombs, terror and war everyday. Something must have been activated not only on 'my file' but also in my bloody mind. My frontal lobe had turned soft, consistent with a highly intense blast of trauma. It felt like some kind of aneurism. My eyes were dripping tears from the moment I woke up to the moment I went to sleep for at least two months afterwards. In fact, I have cried almost everyday since then, so for about 3 years.
I will describe it as not only emotional, it had some kind of neurological impact of how shocking it was, but also, as I say i'd experienced a few coincidences before that stuck in my psyche not only for the high trauma of them, but also for the 'political' consequences that could be implied by them - being worldwide incidents. I'm a bit of a of realist to be interested in conspiracy theories. But simply that some kind of agency could think it appropriate to be involved with me - I've tried to be nice throughout my life - what the hell had I done? Ok I used some porn site. Liked to read the news. And that was about it.
Over the next few days; I was out of work. I had time to carry on reading the news - and the follow up articles began.
See, you can have one event (false flag for example) and then it's followed up with 100s of news stories that are totally made up and so can be constructed to convey whatever message wanted. So you search for something - and then the next nugget of information released by the news agency corresponds with your last search.
When this first happens - you can't be 100% sure that it's actually happening - the element of doubt, the gaslighting, the questions of why, and that you are being watched!
It was not long before sexual elements were introduced.
TBC
It's targeted individual - but I think if I ever gave the full details of how I've been targeted - I might very well be the most targeted individual in history, for this method of targeting at least.
So before I continue...
Describing the initial psychological paradigm shift.
Why was this event so traumatic? After all, people witness real bombs, terror and war everyday. Something must have been activated not only on 'my file' but also in my bloody mind. My frontal lobe had turned soft, consistent with a highly intense blast of trauma. It felt like some kind of aneurism. My eyes were dripping tears from the moment I woke up to the moment I went to sleep for at least two months afterwards. In fact, I have cried almost everyday since then, so for about 3 years.
I will describe it as not only emotional, it had some kind of neurological impact of how shocking it was, but also, as I say i'd experienced a few coincidences before that stuck in my psyche not only for the high trauma of them, but also for the 'political' consequences that could be implied by them - being worldwide incidents. I'm a bit of a of realist to be interested in conspiracy theories. But simply that some kind of agency could think it appropriate to be involved with me - I've tried to be nice throughout my life - what the hell had I done? Ok I used some porn site. Liked to read the news. And that was about it.
Over the next few days; I was out of work. I had time to carry on reading the news - and the follow up articles began.
See, you can have one event (false flag for example) and then it's followed up with 100s of news stories that are totally made up and so can be constructed to convey whatever message wanted. So you search for something - and then the next nugget of information released by the news agency corresponds with your last search.
When this first happens - you can't be 100% sure that it's actually happening - the element of doubt, the gaslighting, the questions of why, and that you are being watched!
It was not long before sexual elements were introduced.
TBC
Next step: Nomenclature
What is in a word? Words, words, words? We all have names - is this our identity?
Because you can be given a name - this is your name - you can also be given a codename. Is this really your identity?
So goes the phrase - we know everything about you. Is that really possible? Is it possible to know what goes on in another mans mind? Moreso, is it possible to know what an action implies? We know that sticking a finger up at a man is an insult because, it means 'fuck you'.
Now lets see what it means when someone, who you don't know in a conventional method of friendship, knows information about you. And how can that be translated into an act...
When an act of false flag terrorism occurs - you are given images of people - these are real people. When you see a photograph that hasn't been manipulated, that person is a person. So it goes, these are the victims of this terrorist attack. They can be given whatever name is deemed necessary. If you can give a person a name - you could create a news story with a picture of a person and say - this person, named Mr Asshole, is the victim of todays bomb. But who is the person behind this photo. If you take the top half of a photo and superimpose it onto another persons mouth, is it still a person?
And so... what is it that's known about a person... and who in this world would want everything to be known about them by anyone they haven't told about them.
--------------------------
It is two months after the latest terror attack.
A continuous stream of news articles has flowed through the public consciousness.
Unbeknownst to the people who read the articles. there are a couple of real life pins in place.
1 - the creator of the article
2 - the subject of the article
--------------------------
And so the same is true with a digital record. Or fingerprint.
The only creator of a digital fingerprint is an identity. The use of that identity is in the control of the interpreter.
So you have digital fingerprint.
Now two months on from traumatic event. It transpires that another event happens that relates back to your digital fingerprint - an agency can say that they know this and that about you and use that to create a ritual sacrifice based upon the intelligence they have gathered. Whether real or not - the information available - saying we have been watching you - gives us means to be able to create a sacrificial story based upon your identity.
A codename is to follow. Maybe after some disambiguation.
TBC
What is in a word? Words, words, words? We all have names - is this our identity?
Because you can be given a name - this is your name - you can also be given a codename. Is this really your identity?
So goes the phrase - we know everything about you. Is that really possible? Is it possible to know what goes on in another mans mind? Moreso, is it possible to know what an action implies? We know that sticking a finger up at a man is an insult because, it means 'fuck you'.
Now lets see what it means when someone, who you don't know in a conventional method of friendship, knows information about you. And how can that be translated into an act...
When an act of false flag terrorism occurs - you are given images of people - these are real people. When you see a photograph that hasn't been manipulated, that person is a person. So it goes, these are the victims of this terrorist attack. They can be given whatever name is deemed necessary. If you can give a person a name - you could create a news story with a picture of a person and say - this person, named Mr Asshole, is the victim of todays bomb. But who is the person behind this photo. If you take the top half of a photo and superimpose it onto another persons mouth, is it still a person?
And so... what is it that's known about a person... and who in this world would want everything to be known about them by anyone they haven't told about them.
--------------------------
It is two months after the latest terror attack.
A continuous stream of news articles has flowed through the public consciousness.
Unbeknownst to the people who read the articles. there are a couple of real life pins in place.
1 - the creator of the article
2 - the subject of the article
--------------------------
And so the same is true with a digital record. Or fingerprint.
The only creator of a digital fingerprint is an identity. The use of that identity is in the control of the interpreter.
So you have digital fingerprint.
Now two months on from traumatic event. It transpires that another event happens that relates back to your digital fingerprint - an agency can say that they know this and that about you and use that to create a ritual sacrifice based upon the intelligence they have gathered. Whether real or not - the information available - saying we have been watching you - gives us means to be able to create a sacrificial story based upon your identity.
A codename is to follow. Maybe after some disambiguation.
TBC
A Brief Article into The Folly of Numbers
It is well known the masonic tendency of numeric compression is ingrained in our world.
Here is an example - the number 223 - is able to compressed into 2 + 2 + 3 = 7
I was aware of this from a very young age. My childhood sweetheart was the daughter of a philosopher.
One who created a theory of everything.
From this it was hypothesised that there are universals innate in mathematics that are inherent to the days of the pyramids, our very DNA, and also into musical structures. While this may seem as an esoteric human ability to find order in a disordered world, it should be taken seriously.
What is somewhat rarely talked about is the connection between numeracy and identity. For example, we believe we're in the 21st century. We also have an annual system. We also have a date of birth.
Date of Birth is one of the fundamental connections to identity, As are specific dates. So now lets talk about, should we wish, date of fucking birth. You could look back through history and find on this day happened.
And so, from also a specific date - we also have a basis for repetition - something that is not only fundamental to psychological condition - but also to identity,
TBC
It is well known the masonic tendency of numeric compression is ingrained in our world.
Here is an example - the number 223 - is able to compressed into 2 + 2 + 3 = 7
I was aware of this from a very young age. My childhood sweetheart was the daughter of a philosopher.
One who created a theory of everything.
From this it was hypothesised that there are universals innate in mathematics that are inherent to the days of the pyramids, our very DNA, and also into musical structures. While this may seem as an esoteric human ability to find order in a disordered world, it should be taken seriously.
What is somewhat rarely talked about is the connection between numeracy and identity. For example, we believe we're in the 21st century. We also have an annual system. We also have a date of birth.
Date of Birth is one of the fundamental connections to identity, As are specific dates. So now lets talk about, should we wish, date of fucking birth. You could look back through history and find on this day happened.
And so, from also a specific date - we also have a basis for repetition - something that is not only fundamental to psychological condition - but also to identity,
TBC
Aero
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 5,910
I didn't say people are all evil. I was just saying they aren't born to be compassionate. Since you brought Darwin into it let's explore that. In the developed world how we treat people isn't critical to our survival. Like we can all still go to the grocery store to buy our food. So as far as short-term needs go. Humans don't really need each other for survival.
If you have never heard of a natural occurring alter ego than you haven't done your homework. Or you are letting propaganda distort fantasy from reality. Maybe you should read the Bible again. Trauma is a big part of what makes Christianity a thing. Like how much of the Bible is built off of the effects of the crucifixion?
A better question would be how much of human belief is based on trauma. And I would say 100%
Chanting
Your identity has already been split and you have a codename.
This codename can be used to deliver cryptic messages to you that are not decipherable to outsiders.
A common tactic is repetitive chanting. Imagine a group of college bullies. They form a circle around a victim, pumping their fists into their hands. They don't have to hurt the victim. They just circle and chant like in a horror movie.
CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE!
Now, everyday for the rest of the semester, every time he passes someone in the corridor.
CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE!
They even daube graffiti at the bus stop.
CARRIE IS A FAG! CARRIE IS GOING TO GET IT!
And so it spreads.
Even when he's not at school. Kids from other schools get involved.
CARRIE! CARRIE!
Except because Carrie is a codename - none of the teachers realise and nothing can be done.
Your identity has already been split and you have a codename.
This codename can be used to deliver cryptic messages to you that are not decipherable to outsiders.
A common tactic is repetitive chanting. Imagine a group of college bullies. They form a circle around a victim, pumping their fists into their hands. They don't have to hurt the victim. They just circle and chant like in a horror movie.
CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE!
Now, everyday for the rest of the semester, every time he passes someone in the corridor.
CARRIE! CARRIE! CARRIE!
They even daube graffiti at the bus stop.
CARRIE IS A FAG! CARRIE IS GOING TO GET IT!
And so it spreads.
Even when he's not at school. Kids from other schools get involved.
CARRIE! CARRIE!
Except because Carrie is a codename - none of the teachers realise and nothing can be done.
Isolation Tactics
Isolated persons with fewer avenues of communication are easier to manipulate.
I said earlier. If you no longer like the news sites you are reading. Why don't you stop reading it?
Bear in mind - triangulation - there are third men - in fact - multiple men involved.
Interfering with other relationships or methods of communication should be done at the earliest stage possible.
So - use of social media. I might have sent a message using Facebook. I might have gone to see a friend.
This friend is then immediately referenced in a coded name in a news article.
But it's not just friends that are potential targets. Family including parents can also be referenced in high profile events that make television news. You might not even have the TV on. It could be on downstairs and your parents are watching it not knowing that they are being referenced. But because it's about you, you're probably going to want to hear what's being communicated.
If you use another website, say a forum to chat about movies, or this forum.
News events will be created based on what you read or what you say. Diminishing your ability to carry on with a normal life.
It is less likely that will be done from what I say here as I could simply link you to it, or it would be done in a way that is plausibly deniable.
Isolated persons with fewer avenues of communication are easier to manipulate.
I said earlier. If you no longer like the news sites you are reading. Why don't you stop reading it?
Bear in mind - triangulation - there are third men - in fact - multiple men involved.
Interfering with other relationships or methods of communication should be done at the earliest stage possible.
So - use of social media. I might have sent a message using Facebook. I might have gone to see a friend.
This friend is then immediately referenced in a coded name in a news article.
But it's not just friends that are potential targets. Family including parents can also be referenced in high profile events that make television news. You might not even have the TV on. It could be on downstairs and your parents are watching it not knowing that they are being referenced. But because it's about you, you're probably going to want to hear what's being communicated.
If you use another website, say a forum to chat about movies, or this forum.
News events will be created based on what you read or what you say. Diminishing your ability to carry on with a normal life.
It is less likely that will be done from what I say here as I could simply link you to it, or it would be done in a way that is plausibly deniable.
Vixy
Star
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 3,907
Well thats the same thing. Uncompassionate people are cold and pretty damn evil. But lets not derail the thread but listen to what Caliban has to say.
Last edited:
Aero
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 5,910
Oh, I'm listening. But it sounds like a lot more than just being a targeted individual.
Any random Joe can target someone for harassment. There's no magic behind it. Give people some phony sense of authority and they will sit around and harass people. Everyone just accepts it and mostly ignores these types. And we definitely don't run around accusing them of a conspiracy.
It sounds more like a secret government project. If so they are just trying to trigger alter egos. What Caliban is calling a coincidence I again refer to as alter egos talking to each other.
Interested to what you mean by alter egos?
There's been a kind of repetition that's created psychological triggers, and I'll try to write about that next.
My understanding is that's it's not a planned project in my case - it just got a bit out of control and so they just started running with it.
But so much has happened that it's now a total absurdity.
There's been a kind of repetition that's created psychological triggers, and I'll try to write about that next.
My understanding is that's it's not a planned project in my case - it just got a bit out of control and so they just started running with it.
But so much has happened that it's now a total absurdity.
Maes17
Superstar
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2017
- Messages
- 6,521
Interesting take on alter egos.
I've come to realize some days I have "motivated" days where my demeanor is different than usual. I'm more get go, less compassionate and super competitive.
As for trauma? Not that I can recall.
Nothing I've ever been through has really traumatized me tbh. If so, it's subconsciously I guess