I'd like to know which aspects of this event is staged. Perhaps the shooting did occur, but they're lying about the
numbers. Or maybe it didn't, and this is all just another epitome of "the world is a stage"
Kids that were interviewed about this did not seem...disturbed as they should be. I watched the news again, and two kids said: "We called 911" but my thing is, wasn't it said that police were already on campus ground? See, this is what confuses me. I have no idea how much of a portion is a hoax and how much is actually true.
And I'm watching a video on YT as we speak.
AND IT IS FULL OF LIES.
Timestamp: 2:55 The news reporter is talking about the time of the shooting. At some point she says, "Police says based on gun evidence, the shooter got into the school by 11:32 and shot more than 100 rounds at this time"
...Now I'll admit I don't know much about guns, but that gun the shooter had- something is wrong here. 100 rounds? What kind of gun has that many bullets and how was an 18 year old able to receive it? Even if he was born in a rich family, which I doubt seeing as he likely lives in that neighborhood the school dwells within, and even if he did have a license, why would someone give him that kind of gun?
Then she says, "At 11:37 another 16 rounds fired by the gunman" What the hell? Continuing, "11:51 more police officers arrive"
And here's the weird part: She goes on to say, "At 12:21 the shooter begins to shoot again" First off, again, what kind of gun is this? Some kind of machine gun? And why did the police offers take half an hour to get to the shooter? 11:51-12:21 the police is there, and yet the shooter is still apparently shooting.
"The shooter shoots again possibly at the door of the classroom he's in" How does this make any sense? Why is he shooting at the door while inside a classroom? So wouldn't all the kids be dead at that point? MORE than 19, realistically speaking? And according to this, he's just inside the class, shooting at the door for no reason? Do you see how this makes 0 sense.
Now they're interviewing a kid,
timestamp 3:55 the kid says, "We were running out the doors because (stutters) two police guards were covering our doors" Here we go again. How are you running out if they're guarding the doors and IF THEY WERE THERE, HOW COME THEY WEREN'T STOPPING THE SHOOTER?
"A-and then, we just (pause) ran out of the room" How...if they were guarding you? And they wouldn't possibly allow children to run out in the hallways where the shooter was anyway.
Timestamp 4:25 "A girl shared her side of the story off camera. According to her, the shooter entered her classroom, shot her teacher (...do I even need to say it) and WHEN HE WALKED AWAY, she smeared blood on herself to play dead."
If he walked away, she wouldn't have needed to play dead and WHY did he just come in their room to only target the teacher while earlier he was shooting 116 rounds?
I can never thank God enough for giving me the characteristic of an analyst. Sometimes overthinking is necessary too.
Anyway, this whole video is nothing but lies and all of the comments fell for it. We may truly never know how many kids actually died, or if they even did at all.