Well then D, I guess it's ok to have sex with your kids right? If they belong completely to the parents?
Well then D, I guess it's ok to have sex with your kids right? If they belong completely to the parents?
Who do they belong to if not the parents then?That doesn't mean they belong to the state either.
^^^^^^^^^^Themselves? God?
Parents are their guardians but children aren't property. You can't just do whatever u want to a child because they share your genetic code.
I don't think that's possible. One of the tests for brain death is response, or lack thereof, to painful stimuli.The child is in pain and suffering. Brain dead with no hoped of recovery
No, sex is for consenting adults.ok to have sex with your kids right?
The State doesn't even share that, but, with guns, gets the final say.You can't just do whatever u want to a child because they share your genetic code
yesThis is about individual rights, the right for Charlie not to suffer. His parents can't accept that he is dying, and want to make him a medical experiment. Even if by some small chance they can save his life what will be the quality of that life?
Keeping him alive is child torture, and you guys are against that right?
no does not mean thatWell then D, I guess it's ok to have sex with your kids right? If they belong completely to the parents?
Same difference. You can do whatever u want with your legal property.i said legally belong
I get what your saying.. in practice though it isn't always so easy. There have been numerous cases of parents withholding basic medical care from their children resulting in their unnecessary deaths. Or applying quack medicine again resulting in their unnecessary deaths.. does your opinion still stand in relation to cases like these?ok then that's not what i meant i just meant that all medical decisions for children should get to be made solely by the parents. IMO of course
Do you have anything to back up those claims?I get what your saying.. in practice though it isn't always so easy. There have been numerous cases of parents withholding basic medical care from their children resulting in their unnecessary deaths. Or applying quack medicine again resulting in their unnecessary deaths.. does your opinion still stand in relation to cases like these?
The court with support of thugs with guns will decide what's best for your child.What exactly is the state doing to your children by gun point?
How do I know it's real?Do any of you read the news??
It's hard to question those that sign your paycheck.Yes a career in child protective services that spanned quite a number of years.
Please do. Though remember that just because the state says that it is so does not make it so.And if you give me a little while I'll post somebody articles
I look forward to it.I'll be back with articles.
Rather than more articles, follow up on the first two links would be good. The third link is more interesting as it shows there is no separation between church and state,http://www.foxnews.com/health/2017/03/03/fundamentalist-pastor-charged-in-toddlers-pneumonia-death.html
http://www.kare11.com/mb/news/crime/parents-charged-with-neglect-in-childs-death/381921413
https://www.masskids.org/index.php/religious-medical-neglect/cases-of-child-deaths
I'll find more tomorrow.