Save The Children

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
2,555

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
6,364
this is wrong on so many levels it's not
even funny in anyway and if my Children
come home with anything like this I will
take it and beat some one in he head with it

The perversion is unspeakable. They are corrupting the children on all fronts. As if the very easy access of pornography on the internet is not yet enough...they are even dumping these sex toys inside the hospitals...This is so sick!
 

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
2,555
right e-Enoch where are the outraged
parents/guardians of these Children
so long as there is none to little pushback
on these issues tptb will play it off and take
it as Us accepting this crap and I for one will
NEVER EVER accept this in anyway shape or
form

there is one cure for this evil twisted perversion
first take out all these ptb pushing their evil sick
agendas and the take out the rest of the sickness
with a bullet as there is no such this as rehabilitation/
reform from this there is enough repeat offender to
prove that beyond a shadow of doubt
 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
6,364
right e-Enoch where are the outraged
parents/guardians of these Children
so long as there is none to little pushback
on these issues tptb will play it off and take
it as Us accepting this crap and I for one will
NEVER EVER accept this in anyway shape or
form

there is one cure for this evil twisted perversion
first take out all these ptb pushing their evil sick
agendas and the take out the rest of the sickness
with a bullet as there is no such this as rehabilitation/
reform from this there is enough repeat offender to
prove that beyond a shadow of doubt
You're right. Where is the outrage from the parents/guardians? They seem to just passively accept these assaults on the children... I pray that the Almighty God would hasten the judgement and punishment upon these guilty, evil perpetrators of these crimes...
 
Last edited:

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,248
Source Article
Researcher admits to being a PAEDOPHILE in bizarre academic paper where he urges society to be 'more tolerant to people attracted to children'
  • Society should stop stigmatizing paedophiles an academic has argued in a paper
  • The unnamed researcher details their experience of being attracted to minors
  • It follows controversy on a paper detailing masturbating to drawings of children

A researcher has seemingly admitted to being a paedophile and has argued for an end to stigmatizing 'minor-attracted persons'.
Writing in an academic journal under a pseudonym, 'Brecht Vaerwaeter' detailed his experience of being attracted to young boys.
He graphicly details multiple incidents of a sexual nature with children, such as bringing a 15-year-old into his tent where they sucked his finger and sneaking up on a sleeping 13-year-old while having a 'painful' erection.
Mr Vaerwaeter argues that paedophilia should be recognised as a legitimate sexual orientation and people like himself should be accepted by society.
The Journal of Controversial Ideas, which he published his controversial essay in, is edited by academics from Oxford University and Princeton University in the US, with an editorial board featuring dozens of prominent academics from both countries.
Mr Vaerwaeter's 10,000 word article was originally published in April but only came to light recently after a piece by the feminist website Reduxx.
It follows scientific outrage earlier this month over another paper by a University of Manchester PhD student, who detailed how he masturbated to drawings of children.
Should paedophile be more accepted by society? This is is the controversial argument penned by a scientist in an academic journal


Should paedophile be more accepted by society? This is is the controversial argument penned by a scientist in an academic journal


In the article itself, Mr Vaerwaeter states he first realised he was attracted to children when he was 17 living in Belgium in the 1990s.
'During gym classes I enjoyed the smooth calves of the second-year boys,' he wrote.
He states he then volunteered to supervise young boys at a school retreat where he sexually fantasied about them.
Even worse when he was 19, and therefore an adult, he joined a summer youth club and began to develop a relationship with young boys.
One, Cédric, was 13 at the time with Mr Vaerwaeter recounting how he was desperate to touch the child at night.
'I carefully crept a little closer. We were practically in a spooning position,' he said.
He described how he had a 'prolonged, in the end even painful erection,' during the incident, which he said was 'highly unwelcome and inappropriate.'
Later that summer Mr Vaerwaeter gleefully accepted a proposal by the youth to spend the night in his tent.
'As I had hoped, it was not just about sleeping, since he was not averse to some wrestling and mutual tickling from time to time,' he said.
Another interaction, this time with Jeroen, a 15-year-old boy breached even more ethical boundaries.
'That evening, in the tent, he asked me if there was any room next to me, because he would like to come and sleep there,' Mr Vaerwaeter recalled.
'He grabbed my hand and pressed it onto his face.
'Overcome with emotion I started stroking his face, and then he opened his mouth a bit and sucked my finger for a while.'
In his article, titled 'The Paedophile as a Human Being: An Autoethnography for the Recognition of a Marginalised Sexual Orientation', Mr Vaerwaeter said he has never had sex with a minor, nor he does encourage it.
However, he argues for the broader acceptance of paedophiles in society.
'I feel that paedophilia should explicitly be recognised as a sexual orientation by anyone who deals with issues of sexual identity in any way,' he said.
Mr Vaerwaeter added that paedophiles deserve 'recognition and attention to their emotional problems'.
'Rejecting paedophilia as a sexual orientation is unethical and intellectually unfair,' he said.
However, he did draw the line at defending 'members of the paedophile community' who engage in sex with children or use child pornography.
But Mr Vaerwaeter added more needed to be done to help the 'tens of thousands of young people' who have 'paedophilic feelings'.
He looked to the LGBTQ+ community to provide a base for this movement.
'Pedophiles are a particular sexual minority,' Mr Vaerwaeter wrote. '[They] face the same problems of stigma, discrimination and social isolation as other members of the LGBT community, albeit to a greater degree.
'If the community is to be inclusive, then it must live up to the meaning of the ‘+’ in its acronym.'
Mr Vaerwaeter claimed more acceptance would both help paedophiles themselves by offering them mental support and potentially prevent the abuse of children.
'Explaining to them that they are not alone, that they are not destined to abuse children, and that they can find someone to talk with, can avoid the worst of harm, and can also prevent child sexual abuse,' he said.
Increased acceptance of paedophilia has been touted by some experts before.
Some groups have been mired in controversy, such as the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a British organisation which campaigned to lower the age of consent in the 80s.
Several Labour politicians were linked to PIE's campaigning due to its then affiliation with the National Council for Civil Liberties.
But others have argued that making paedophilia more socially acceptable would encourage people who are sexually attracted to children to come forward and seek mental health support.
Mr Vaerwaeter details his own struggles with 'isolation' being unable to discuss his 'sexuality'.
'I continue to find it distressing and problematic that in the kind of environment I work in, which is populated with openminded, highly educated people, I cannot be open about my own sexuality,' he said.
The Journal of Controversial Ideas is edited by Professor Jeff McMahan an expert in moral philosophy at the University of Oxford, and Professor Peter Singer, an expert in bioethics at Princeton University.
They established the journal in response to 'cancel culture' and allow academics to publish 'offensive, immoral, or dangerous' papers under a fake-name if they wished.
The journal does have some rules, stating it would not publish information on the creation of biological weapons for example, and said the final decision would rest with the editors.
'What does and does not count as dangerous will be determined by the editors, in consultation with the editorial board and, if necessary, external experts, on a case-by-case basis,' their publication policy reads.
The journal, was contacted for comment regarding the publication of Mr Vaerwaeter's piece.
This latest article comes off the back on another controversial academic paper concerning potentially paedophilic content.
Earlier this month Karl Andersson, a PhD student at the University of Manchester, was criticised by academics and the public alike for publishing a paper detailing how he masturbated for three months to Japanese comics featuring young boys.
Publishing the piece in the journal Qualitative Research, Mr Andersson said he was researching a genre known as shota, which he describes feature drawings of 'young boy characters in a cute or, most often, sexually explicit way'.
He wrote that after 'hitting a wall' in his studies of people who enjoy this genre, he decided to interact with the subject matter in a more hands-on fashion.
'I therefore started reading the comics in the same way as my research participants had told me that they did it: while masturbating,' he said.
Qualitative Research's editors have since retracted the paper following an investigation and have acknowledged the 'harm' caused by its publication.
The University of Manchester has launched its own investigation and while that is ongoing they said they suspended the student involved as a 'precautionary measure', though Mr Andersson is still listed as a researcher on its website.
A statement from the University also said Greater Manchester Police has opened an investigation into the matter, and they are assisting this.
 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
6,364
"Writing in an academic journal under a pseudonym"
Wondering what kind of a vetting job the "academic journal" did for Mr Vaerwaeter eh?
The fact that this "author" needs to hide behind a pseudonym is already suspicious...The standard practice in academic publication is to also publish one's identity and professional affiliations, albeit in the form of a brief bio-note...

This "journal" does not seem to conduct a professional/ethical peer review process by legit professors/authors/editors.

The so-called "editorial board" of this "publication" from Oxford & Princeton are most likely members of lgbtq and are themselves, pedophiles. I'm losing "respect" for these Oxford academics in the field of liberal arts, involved in promoting this sexual perversion...
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,561
The fact that this "author" needs to hide behind a pseudonym is already suspicious...The standard practice in academic publication is to also publish one's identity and professional affiliations, albeit in the form of a brief bio-note...

This "journal" does not seem to conduct a professional/ethical peer review process by legit professors/authors/editors.

The so-called "editorial board" of this "publication" from Oxford & Princeton are most likely members of lgbtq and are themselves, pedophiles. I'm losing "respect" for these Oxford academics in the field of liberal arts, involved in promoting this sexual perversion...
Its such a shame too... think about if they put all of their pedo-perversion powers into studying and supporting ADULT sexuality instead of trying to force fetishes and kinks on kids? Imagine all the good that brainpower could do if it would just become focused on healthy, adult sexuality studies instead of... this garbage.
 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
6,364
Its such a shame too... think about if they put all of their pedo-perversion powers into studying and supporting ADULT sexuality instead of trying to force fetishes and kinks on kids? Imagine all the good that brainpower could do if it would just become focused on healthy, adult sexuality studies instead of... this garbage.
Absolutely. These people are increasingly "consuming garbage" and "indoctrinating" people in the guise of "academic research..." It's shameful beyond words...
 

Slava

Rookie
Joined
Apr 19, 2022
Messages
65
Couple discovers ‘freaky’ hidden room behind bathroom wall in their home
Carolyn and Steven later learned that the room was not some sort of ominous torture chamber, but a room used to store coal during the Victorian era.
It’s unclear why a bedrame was moved into the concealed space, but the couple have not yet removed it. Their daughter even contemplated using the room to shoot a horror movie for school, with the bed serving as a spooky prop for the flick.

Coal? That doesn't explain why the bed is there.
Maybe it's a play on words: koala - coal?
In my search for information, I came across this symbolic connection: "koala - child/people traffic"
I don't claim that the information below explains this connection, but still.



Koala House
 

Slava

Rookie
Joined
Apr 19, 2022
Messages
65
And here is the channel of one of those who commented on the crib video -
ice_cream.jpg
His commentary is like fact-checkers. People who are susceptible to other people's opinions will think "oh yeah, that's probably true". But for a bomb shelter, the walls and ceiling must be reinforced or the shelter could collapse.

There are two videos on this commenter's channel, one of which I found odd - ice cream.
This man and his child are acting out a staged scene, the words spoken are pre-arranged - you can especially see it in the man's moving lips when the child says his sentence.

Watch the video, and then we'll compare what we heard
We have two codes 106 and ice cream.
I do not speak English, but I can understand some simple phrases by ear. Maybe I'm talking back to the man, but I heard hunger sex instead of one hundred six. Then the child says the phrase about ice cream.

Judging by the name of the channel, the name and the search - it's probably the actor
interesting Filmography...
 
Last edited:

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,561
And here is the channel of one of those who commented on the crib video -
View attachment 80602
His commentary is like fact-checkers. People who are susceptible to other people's opinions will think "oh yeah, that's probably true". But for a bomb shelter, the walls and ceiling must be reinforced or the shelter could collapse.

There are two videos on this commenter's channel, one of which I found odd - ice cream.
This man and his child are acting out a staged scene, the words spoken are pre-arranged - you can especially see it in the man's moving lips when the child says his sentence.

Watch the video, and then we'll compare what we heard
We have two codes 106 and ice cream.
I do not speak English, but I can understand some simple phrases by ear. Maybe I'm talking back to the man, but I heard hunger sex instead of one hundred six. Then the child says the phrase about ice cream.

Judging by the name of the channel, the name and the search - it's probably the actor
interesting Filmography...
Interesting...
 

BeemBow

Star
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Messages
3,447
Source Article
Researcher admits to being a PAEDOPHILE in bizarre academic paper where he urges society to be 'more tolerant to people attracted to children'
  • Society should stop stigmatizing paedophiles an academic has argued in a paper
  • The unnamed researcher details their experience of being attracted to minors
  • It follows controversy on a paper detailing masturbating to drawings of children

A researcher has seemingly admitted to being a paedophile and has argued for an end to stigmatizing 'minor-attracted persons'.
Writing in an academic journal under a pseudonym, 'Brecht Vaerwaeter' detailed his experience of being attracted to young boys.
He graphicly details multiple incidents of a sexual nature with children, such as bringing a 15-year-old into his tent where they sucked his finger and sneaking up on a sleeping 13-year-old while having a 'painful' erection.
Mr Vaerwaeter argues that paedophilia should be recognised as a legitimate sexual orientation and people like himself should be accepted by society.
The Journal of Controversial Ideas, which he published his controversial essay in, is edited by academics from Oxford University and Princeton University in the US, with an editorial board featuring dozens of prominent academics from both countries.
Mr Vaerwaeter's 10,000 word article was originally published in April but only came to light recently after a piece by the feminist website Reduxx.
It follows scientific outrage earlier this month over another paper by a University of Manchester PhD student, who detailed how he masturbated to drawings of children.
Should paedophile be more accepted by society? This is is the controversial argument penned by a scientist in an academic journal


Should paedophile be more accepted by society? This is is the controversial argument penned by a scientist in an academic journal


In the article itself, Mr Vaerwaeter states he first realised he was attracted to children when he was 17 living in Belgium in the 1990s.
'During gym classes I enjoyed the smooth calves of the second-year boys,' he wrote.
He states he then volunteered to supervise young boys at a school retreat where he sexually fantasied about them.
Even worse when he was 19, and therefore an adult, he joined a summer youth club and began to develop a relationship with young boys.
One, Cédric, was 13 at the time with Mr Vaerwaeter recounting how he was desperate to touch the child at night.
'I carefully crept a little closer. We were practically in a spooning position,' he said.
He described how he had a 'prolonged, in the end even painful erection,' during the incident, which he said was 'highly unwelcome and inappropriate.'
Later that summer Mr Vaerwaeter gleefully accepted a proposal by the youth to spend the night in his tent.
'As I had hoped, it was not just about sleeping, since he was not averse to some wrestling and mutual tickling from time to time,' he said.
Another interaction, this time with Jeroen, a 15-year-old boy breached even more ethical boundaries.
'That evening, in the tent, he asked me if there was any room next to me, because he would like to come and sleep there,' Mr Vaerwaeter recalled.
'He grabbed my hand and pressed it onto his face.
'Overcome with emotion I started stroking his face, and then he opened his mouth a bit and sucked my finger for a while.'
In his article, titled 'The Paedophile as a Human Being: An Autoethnography for the Recognition of a Marginalised Sexual Orientation', Mr Vaerwaeter said he has never had sex with a minor, nor he does encourage it.
However, he argues for the broader acceptance of paedophiles in society.
'I feel that paedophilia should explicitly be recognised as a sexual orientation by anyone who deals with issues of sexual identity in any way,' he said.
Mr Vaerwaeter added that paedophiles deserve 'recognition and attention to their emotional problems'.
'Rejecting paedophilia as a sexual orientation is unethical and intellectually unfair,' he said.
However, he did draw the line at defending 'members of the paedophile community' who engage in sex with children or use child pornography.
But Mr Vaerwaeter added more needed to be done to help the 'tens of thousands of young people' who have 'paedophilic feelings'.
He looked to the LGBTQ+ community to provide a base for this movement.
'Pedophiles are a particular sexual minority,' Mr Vaerwaeter wrote. '[They] face the same problems of stigma, discrimination and social isolation as other members of the LGBT community, albeit to a greater degree.
'If the community is to be inclusive, then it must live up to the meaning of the ‘+’ in its acronym.'
Mr Vaerwaeter claimed more acceptance would both help paedophiles themselves by offering them mental support and potentially prevent the abuse of children.
'Explaining to them that they are not alone, that they are not destined to abuse children, and that they can find someone to talk with, can avoid the worst of harm, and can also prevent child sexual abuse,' he said.
Increased acceptance of paedophilia has been touted by some experts before.
Some groups have been mired in controversy, such as the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a British organisation which campaigned to lower the age of consent in the 80s.
Several Labour politicians were linked to PIE's campaigning due to its then affiliation with the National Council for Civil Liberties.
But others have argued that making paedophilia more socially acceptable would encourage people who are sexually attracted to children to come forward and seek mental health support.
Mr Vaerwaeter details his own struggles with 'isolation' being unable to discuss his 'sexuality'.
'I continue to find it distressing and problematic that in the kind of environment I work in, which is populated with openminded, highly educated people, I cannot be open about my own sexuality,' he said.
The Journal of Controversial Ideas is edited by Professor Jeff McMahan an expert in moral philosophy at the University of Oxford, and Professor Peter Singer, an expert in bioethics at Princeton University.
They established the journal in response to 'cancel culture' and allow academics to publish 'offensive, immoral, or dangerous' papers under a fake-name if they wished.
The journal does have some rules, stating it would not publish information on the creation of biological weapons for example, and said the final decision would rest with the editors.
'What does and does not count as dangerous will be determined by the editors, in consultation with the editorial board and, if necessary, external experts, on a case-by-case basis,' their publication policy reads.
The journal, was contacted for comment regarding the publication of Mr Vaerwaeter's piece.
This latest article comes off the back on another controversial academic paper concerning potentially paedophilic content.
Earlier this month Karl Andersson, a PhD student at the University of Manchester, was criticised by academics and the public alike for publishing a paper detailing how he masturbated for three months to Japanese comics featuring young boys.
Publishing the piece in the journal Qualitative Research, Mr Andersson said he was researching a genre known as shota, which he describes feature drawings of 'young boy characters in a cute or, most often, sexually explicit way'.
He wrote that after 'hitting a wall' in his studies of people who enjoy this genre, he decided to interact with the subject matter in a more hands-on fashion.
'I therefore started reading the comics in the same way as my research participants had told me that they did it: while masturbating,' he said.
Qualitative Research's editors have since retracted the paper following an investigation and have acknowledged the 'harm' caused by its publication.
The University of Manchester has launched its own investigation and while that is ongoing they said they suspended the student involved as a 'precautionary measure', though Mr Andersson is still listed as a researcher on its website.
A statement from the University also said Greater Manchester Police has opened an investigation into the matter, and they are assisting this.
LOCK HIM UP!
 

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
2,555
LOCK HIM UP!
unfortunately We have Seen what locking these kinds
of perverted evil sickness does BeemBow

many get out,learn from how they were caught as though it
was a mistake then they adapt from that mistake,to not get
caught that way again,way too many who get out and are repeat
offenders

I stand by my one solution for this as then there is no chance to
adapt or murder another Child/Children,I Know many don't view
this as murder I do it's murders/destroys who that Child/Children
were meant to be

it causes life long ramifications in all areas of their lives
mostly in how they form relationships with anyone making
it quite difficult to form any meaningful trusting relationships
 
Last edited:

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,561
unfortunately We have Seen what locking these kinds
of perverted evil sickness does BeemBow

many get ou,learn from how they were caught as though it
was a mistake then they adapt from that mistake,to not get
caught that way again,way too many who get out and are repeat
offenders

I stand by my one solution for this as then there is no chance to
adapt or murder another Child/Children,I Know many don't view
this as murder I do it's murders/destroys who that Child/Children
were meant to be

it causes life long ramifications in all areas of their lives
mostly in how they form relationships with anyone making
it quite difficult to form any meaningful trusting relationships
In cases of extreme child abuse (r*pe/trafficking/torture/murder/etc.) I think you are right. When its that far gone, the person should be removed. Drs/scientists or whoever can study them while they are in custody if that would be of use... but outside of that, pretty much a one way ticket.
 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
6,364
What is wrong with the human condition?
Why? JUST WHY?!
Even in the bible...why?
Blood-shed and death and sacrifice
it's all just too much at times!
This is how serious sin is...the fallen nature of human beings bent on following satanic influences... the Bible describes this depravity...from the very beginning...

Only the power of The Almighty God through the ultimate sacrifice of The Saviour Jesus Christ can break the cycle of evil...and sin...


John 1:29 ESV

The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

Romans 3:23

for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

Psalm 51:5

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity,
And in sin my mother conceived me.

Mark 7:21

For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries,

Ephesians 5:8

for you were formerly darkness, but now you are Light in the Lord; walk as children of Light

Jeremiah 17:9

“The heart is more deceitful than all else
And is desperately sick;
Who can understand it?

Source: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Depravity-Of-Man
 

redqueen

Star
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
2,555
In cases of extreme child abuse (r*pe/trafficking/torture/murder/etc.) I think you are right. When its that far gone, the person should be removed. Drs/scientists or whoever can study them while they are in custody if that would be of use... but outside of that, pretty much a one way ticket.
that's what I meant too TempestOfTempo
does it have to be an extreme case though

oprah is Known to have said "if the pedo
is any good the child won't even Know they
are being molested/harmed"

to be it doesn't have to be so bad that it's
an actual physical scarring on the Child
the mental scarring is enough,the new way
that Child then becomes wired when it comes
to what Love is is enough

I'm not talking about the two teens in Love and
one of them either way boy/girl is a few yrs off
the other like say 15-18 that's just being young,dumb
and in Love right

that sorta thing I don't think should even make the
registry ,unless it's maybe 18 yr that makes a habit
of dating 12-15 then that maybe signs of the beginning
of predatory behaviour

I was more speaking of the 20something going after a
15 and down because they Know that the other being a
Child yet is more easily manipulated,I Hope that makes sense?
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,561
that's what I meant too TempestOfTempo
does it have to be an extreme case though

oprah is Known to have said "if the pedo
is any good the child won't even Know they
are being molested/harmed"

to be it doesn't have to be so bad that it's
an actual physical scarring on the Child
the mental scarring is enough,the new way
that Child then becomes wired when it comes
to what Love is is enough

I'm not talking about the two teens in Love and
one of them either way boy/girl is a few yrs off
the other like say 15-18 that's just being young,dumb
and in Love right

that sorta thing I don't think should even make the
registry ,unless it's maybe 18 yr that makes a habit
of dating 12-15 then that maybe signs of the beginning
of predatory behaviour

I was more speaking of the 20something going after a
15 and down because they Know that the other being a
Child yet is more easily manipulated,I Hope that makes sense?
Well I can only speak for myself, but if someone Oprahs age is engaging in ped-activity I dont care if shes so slick about it that she doesnt feel the kid has been harmed... because irreversible harm does occur. Same way I feel about pimps with underrage trafficking victims, grooming gangs or the people who claim to be Muslims but still promote ped activity. Generally I also agree with you about a 20+ person going after a young teenager.

From a Mexican perspective I can say this... There are families who are ok with their 16/17 year old high-school daughter dating an older guy so long as its an actual match (they really love each other) and he aint some super creepy or old weirdo. He cant be so old that its offensive or that the two cant relate, there has to be a genuine connection and most of them are going to be clear that she has to finish school. But if he proves to be responsible and hard working they will view it as "They are in love and he is a bit older, so being more mature he can be a better husband/father/provider. Less immature hassles to deal with". Im not interested in that for my children, but I do see the situation I just described as very different from the "Muslims" discussed in the other thread who were selling unwilling young children (some not even aged 10) to random, mean old mean from who knows where.
 
Top