Rumors of War

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
This was written before Russia invaded the Ukraine.

The stage is set.

The continent of Europe is home to numerous nations and diverse ethnic groups and religions—almost all with competing economic and conflicting political interests, differences that over the centuries have often led its people into brutal warfare.

Now one nation, a big one, threatens Europe’s peace and stability. Russia is led by the all-powerful Vladimir Putin, who, while lately speaking about peace, looks as if he is planning an invasion into Ukraine. Is he bluffing? Some years ago, Russia wasn’t bluffing when it annexed a disputed region of Ukraine, and the world did nothing. What about now? How will Russia’s neighbors respond if, making good on the threats, Putin fully invades?

Conditions and tensions were similar in Europe in 1939, the eve of the Second World War. But if this crisis does escalate into a regional armed conflict, would it also lead us into another worldwide conflagration? Should you be concerned? Does the Bible tell us anything?



 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Estranged Neighbors

It’s complicated. Ukraine, which borders Russia, though an independent nation with its own culture, religion (Ukrainian Orthodox Church), and language, has long had ties to Russia and hosts a large, distinctly Russian population. Amid the shifting of borders in Eastern Europe after World War II and the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukraine has had at times a close relationship with Russia—and other times not.

Ukraine had been part of the Soviet Union’s Western border, known as the Iron Curtain, directly ruled by Moscow until the collapse of the USSR in 1991, when it—along with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—broke away.

Much to the Russian’s dismay, however, many of these new nations joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a war-power alliance of several Western European nations, Canada, Britain, and the United States. Formed in 1949, NATO was designed to deter Communist aggression in Europe. The Soviets responded with its own alliance, the Warsaw Pact, entering into a coalition with seven Soviet satellite states: Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Romania.

Though NATO and the Warsaw Pact never went to war, much of the Cold War, at least in Europe, played out through the NATO-Warsaw Pact rivalry. “By 2008, Moscow’s erstwhile eastern European satellites, once part of the defunct Warsaw Pact, had all been absorbed into NATO, despite earlier pledges by Western leaders that no such expansion would take place.

Even Paranoids Have Real Enemies

Only those living during the Cold War and the threat of nuclear conflict could appreciate just how seriously Russia is taking the NATO alliance.

The question of NATO expansion forms the essence of Putin’s war cries against Ukraine, which sits on Russia’s border. He does not want Ukraine to host NATO military forces. It would pose, the Russians warn, a dire “security threat.”

Putin’s paranoia makes some sense. Imagine Canada and Mexico forming a military alliance to oppose the United States. And remember that in World War II, when the Soviet Union was invaded by the Germans, Hitler’s armies staged the invasion through Ukraine; indeed, in some places, the Germans were welcomed as liberators because millions of Ukrainians had starved to death under Stalin’s brutal rule.

Fending off the German assault in World War II cost the Russians more than 20 million dead, a reality seared in the Russian psyche. (In contrast, the American war dead in all wars is about a million.) Putin, understandably, would not want another potential adversary parked on his border.

On the other hand, NATO has always been a defensive alliance. It was created specifically to deter a Soviet attack on Western Europe. Even at the height of Cold War tensions, NATO never attacked the Soviet Union, and it’s hard to imagine that NATO, with or without Ukraine, would ever launch a military offensive against Russia today.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Rumor of War?

Though Putin has claimed that he will not invade Ukraine, the 100,000 troops he has amassed on the Ukrainian border send another message. It signals, too, just how serious he is about Ukraine and NATO, even if he has ulterior motives, such as possession of Ukraine’s major ports on the Black Sea, as well as tightening his grip on the flow of oil to Western Europe, with a major pipeline running through Ukraine.

However much the West wants a diplomatic solution, they refuse to concede to the demand that Ukraine never join NATO. Thus, Putin sees “little ground for optimism.” Though some experts claim that Russia would never invade and that all this saber-rattling is designed merely to wring concessions from the West, plans are being made in case he does, including “brutal” economic sanctions. That would be bad enough, but there are serious concerns that such actions could quickly escalate into wider armed conflict, with both sides possessing nuclear weapons.

Almost two thousand years ago, Jesus signaled that before His return, “nation shall rise against nation” (Matthew 24:7) and that we would hear of “wars and rumors of wars” (Matthew 24:6). This latest crisis is yet another fulfillment of that warning. However much people have predicted that human progress, science, and reason would usher in an era of utopia and peace, it has never happened and, according to the Bible—which predicts “a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time” (Daniel 12:1)—it never will. Instead, things will get only worse before Christ returns.

Yet, amid these signs, Jesus also said, “Look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near” (Luke 21:28). In other words, however bad things get, we have hope because Jesus will return, and all these wars, rumors of wars, and troubles will be over forever.


 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Putin claimed he had kicked out the rothchilde bank. there are rumors he is hitting military labs run by cabal in ukraine. Biden admin is certainly cabal controlled. Could he be doing the world a favor ? https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2022/02/24/sean-penn-goes-to-ukraine-to-shoot-documentary-attends-press-briefing-in-kyiv/
Both sides are cabal controlled. They have been for hundreds of years. The cabal created communism, then they pitted capitalism against communism. They start/started wars to usher in the New World Order. It is well known that wall street financed both sides of the second world war for example. The cabal or elites want to bring the NWO as one-world system in which the control everything like economics, religion, education, medicine, food, and all other aspects of life. This NWO cannot come about without controlled conflict. This is something they've been aiming for, for decades and more. As I posted in another forum, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

Winston Churchill said, “The creation of an authoritative world order is the ultimate aim toward which we must strive.” George W. Blount, Peace Through World Government (Durham, Carolina: Moore Publishing Company, 1974): 30.

Charles De Gaulle was convinced that “Nations must unite in a world government or perish.”

Many other influential people have said similar things over the years. Like Presidents of the USA (if I find their quotes I will post them in this thread). Why a one world government? Because they want complete control over us. And anyone who disagrees with them will be punished. This is what is going to lead to the mark of the beast where all of us are going to decide which side we are on. They have and are introducing new laws all the time that take our freedoms away slowly until eventually we will be completely under their control. True Christians will disagree with laws that go against the Word of God and they will be persecuted. Its all satanic. The political leaders are Satan's agents doing his bidding. Satan wants most people to be lost eternally and will make people's lives very difficult unless they do what the governments of the world are forcing them to do through legislation.
 
Last edited:

DevaWolf

Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Messages
537
War has been a constant since the start of humanity. So your point is?
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
War has been a constant since the start of humanity. So your point is?
True, war has been a constant since sin entered this world which we share with Satan and his angels, but for a few hundred years there have been powers behind the scenes that planned/are planning to control the entire world. There is neither right or left with them. All they are working toward is complete control of the world. They are behind the revolutions, planned wars (including the two world wars) created communism and capitalism etc. They are evil and doing it for power, riches and other reasons. They worship the devil and are his agents. They want to bring in a New World Order so they can have complete control of all us and the Bible says they will succeed except for those who believe and worship God in truth.
 
Last edited:

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,081
Question should be asked with this rumor of war...why did putin want chernoybl so bad?
 

Vmort

Star
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,514
Question should be asked with this rumor of war...why did putin want chernoybl so bad?
Because that wahat nuclear station are -- their plan is to kill 99% of Humanity. They didn't care about Ukraine at all.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Hegelian Thinking and World Politics

Summary: Hegelian dialectic thinking is applied in many situations in world politics. Often the ordinary people are used as pawns in the game of Hegelian psychology played by those who pull the strings of world control.


Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a German philosopher who revolutionized European thinking, especially Marxism. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Hegel developed the concept of integrating and uniting a set of contradictions without eliminating or reducing either one, to create a synthesis. This concept is often called “dialectic thinking.”

Hegelian dialectic thinking is applied in many situations in world politics. Often the ordinary people are used as pawns in the game of Hegelian psychology played by those who pull the strings of world control.

The political “left” and “right” are pitted against each other in order to achieve a synthesis that suits those in hidden positions of world power. In the United States, for example, the right side was in power until several aims were accomplished, such as the War on Iraq and the War on Terror. Then, when all that could be done by that side was accomplished, the left came into power claiming to bring about change. However, the change only continued wars in Iraq and elsewhere, and brought in additional social reforms that further limited the freedom of the American people.

This pitting of one side against another is a form of controlled conflict that those behind the scenes use to create a predetermined history. In his novel Coningsby, Benjamin Disraeli writes this:

The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Benjamin Disraeli, Coningsby (1844): 166.

US President Woodrow Wilson said this:

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1961): 24
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
A New World Order

Here is an example of the Hegelian dialectic process:

The synthesis the elite wants is the New World Order—a one-world system in which economics, religion, education, medicine, food, and all other aspects of life are controlled by a central power. This New World Order cannot come about without controlled conflict.

In Das Capital, Karl Marx posed capitalism as thesis and communism as antithesis. However, a crucial element of this position has been ignored by most historians, including Marxists. They fail to notice that any conflict between these two forces cannot lead to a society governed by either one, but must lead to a society characterized by a synthesis of these two conflicting forces.

For Hegelian thinkers, the function of a Congress or a Parliament is to allow the ordinary individuals to feel that their opinions have some value, and the state to take advantage of any wisdom that the population may come up with. Hegel writes this:

"By virtue of this participation, subjective liberty and conceit, with their general opinion, [individuals] can show themselves palpably efficacious and enjoy the satisfaction of feeling themselves to count for something." Anthony C. Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones (Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986): 115-125.

Thus, for Hegel, the individual is merely a pawn in the larger unfolding of world events. Following this same line of thought, Hegel expects individuals to blindly follow a leader who essentially thinks for them. To such leaders, the common people are like expendable human cattle.

This hierarchical system affects individuals’ own morality as they are taught and encouraged to say and do what’s politically correct, without realizing they are being manipulated. In this subtle way, an individual’s rights such as freedom of speech are taken away. Read about Martial Law in America.

The state requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. Individuals cannot exist for themselves in these so-called organic systems, but only exist to perform a role in the operation of the state.

Following the outbreak of war in 1939, social creditor C.H. Douglas said, “Unfortunately the world is in the grasp of theorists to whom misery and death of millions is a grain of sand beside the working out of their designs.” There was no freedom in Hitler’s Germany; there is no freedom for the individual under Marxism, and there will be no freedom in the New World Order.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Controlled Conflict

In the Hegelian system, conflict is essential. American philosopher and education reformer John Dewey (1859-1952), wrote this:

"War is the most effective preacher of the vanity of all merely finite interests. It puts an end to that selfish egoism of the individual by which he would claim his life and his property as his own or as his family’s." John Dewey, Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The middle works, 1899-1924 (Southern Illinois University Press, 1979): 197.

Furthermore, Anthony C. Sutton, author of America’s Secret Establishment, writes of the Hegelian dialectic at work in our world today:

"The operational history of The Order can only be understood within a framework of the Hegelian dialectic process. Quite simply this is the notion that conflict creates history. From this axiom, it follows that controlled conflict can create a predetermined history. For example: when the Trilateral Commission discusses “managed conflict”, as it does extensively in its literature, the Commission implies the managed use of conflict for long run predetermined ends—not for the mere random exercise of manipulative control to solve a problem. The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World Order.

Without controlled conflict this New World Order will not come about. Random individual actions of persons in society would not lead to this synthesis. It’s artificial; therefore it has to be created. And this is being done with the calculated, managed use of conflict. And all the while this synthesis is being sought, there is profit in playing the involved parties against one another. This explains why the International Bankers backed the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, ad nauseum, against the United States.
The “conflict” built profits while pushing the world ever closer to One World Government. The process continues today…

In Hegelian philosophy, the conflict of political “right” and political “left”, or thesis and antithesis in Hegelian terms, is essential to the forward movement of history and historical change itself. Conflict between thesis and antitheses brings about synthesis, ie. a new historical situation…

Compare this to the spirit and letter of the Constitution of the United States: “We the people” grant the state some powers and reserve all others to the people. Separation of church and state is built into the US Constitution, a denial of Hegel’s “The State is God on earth”. Yet, compare this legal requirement to the actions of The Order in the United States, the Group in England, the
Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in Russia. For these elitists, the State is supreme and a self-appointed elite running the State acts indeed as God on earth…

College textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiation into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals…

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Never in Western textbooks will you find the evidence that revolutions need finance and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street…

The key to modern history is in these facts: that elitists have close working relations with both Marxists and Nazis…In this memorandum, we will present the concept that world history, certainly since about 1917, reflects deliberately created conflict with the objective of bringing about a synthesis, a New World Order (emphases added). Anthony C. Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones (Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986): 115-125.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Order Ab Chao

Another example of elitist manipulation of world issues is expressed in the motto Ordo Ab Chao or “Order Out of Chaos.” This motto mimics Hegelian thinking in that out of the chaos of war and conflict comes order, or a synthesis of peace. The events surrounding 9/11 are a prime example of this order out of chaos. Out of the chaos of that horrific event, several laws were passed to create a better order by increasing control over the people.

The USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism), passed on October 26, 2001. This act includes the controversial clause allowing for the indefinite detention of suspected alien terrorists even if they have not had a public trial to determine if they are terrorists. USA Patriot Act.

The Homeland Security Act, passed on November 25, 2002. This law radically restructured numerous federal departments into a single Homeland Security Department. Such a dramatic restructuring intended to better prevent terrorist threats by centralizing surveillance data coming in from the USA Patriot Act and by removing potential firewalls between central agencies. Homeland Security Act.

The Military Commissions Act (MCA), passed on October 18, 2006, essentially gives the US the authority to sanction human rights violations for the sake of “The War on Terror.” The Military Commissions Act. Read also about combining military forces in the US.

The Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, passed on October 23, 2007, broadens the definition of “violent radicalization” so that some analysts fear acts of civil disobedience and protest could be potentially suspect in the government’s attempt to determine how and if people with radical beliefs turn into people who use violence to convey these beliefs. The Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, see also www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/6-the-homegrown-terrorism-prevention-act.

Taken together, these anti-terrorism laws lead to increased security at airports, the ability to arrest people without sufficient evidence or reason, and fewer privacy rights.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
A Revised History

Textbooks present wars, revolutions, and conflicts as unavoidable, accidental occurrences. When political negotiations decay into physical conflict, historians portray wars as coming after valiant efforts to avoid conflict. Unfortunately, this is not always the case.

When Nazi war criminals were investigated, the tribunals were careful to censor any records of Western assistance to Hitler. Similarly, Western textbooks tend to gloss over any information that indicates the key players in the West gave financial aid to the 1917 Russian Revolution because they didn’t want to appear pro-Communist.

In this sense, our Western history books are just as censored as the news and propaganda in Hitler’s day or in Communist China. We must read history books critically and intelligently not just for what they say, but also for what they don’t say. Hence, our freedom of the press is not as “free” as we like to think it is.

War is almost preplanned behind the scenes, and the individuals pulling the strings are not necessarily the leaders of the countries in conflict. State leaders are often puppets themselves, controlled by elites to whom they owe their position. Much of the time, these elitists make revolutions appear as a sudden, spontaneous outbreak of a downtrodden class against a tyrannical government, whereas this is not always the case. In too many cases, the downtrodden class is used as pawns to fulfill an agenda of someone much higher up.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Who are these Elitists?

The elitists are the ones who govern our world behind-the-scenes in secret negotiations. They come in all walks of life and are part of a variety of organizations. They are most often very rich. The Bilderberg Club is one such elitist organization, as is the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, a number of secret societies, and of course, the Jesuits, who take on any guise necessary to accomplish their aim of world dominion. Often the same people are involved in multiple organizations.

In The History of the Jesuits, Andrew Steinmetz writes about Michaelangelo Tamburini, General of the Jesuits, who in 1720 said to the Duke of Brancas: “See, my lord, from this room, I govern not only Paris, but China: not only China, but the whole world, without anyone knowing how `tis managed." Andrew Steinmetz, History of the Jesuits volume 1 (1848): 107.

This ancient quote may seem out of date to 20th-century readers, but the fact is that the Jesuits have never changed their aim or motto in all their history, and keep their numbers and work very hidden.

Abraham Lincoln, Samuel Morse, and other early founders of the United States feared the Jesuits' aim to control the United States. America was at that time a shining example to all the oppressed of Europe of a nation free under God. The French General Lafayette, raised as a Roman Catholic, said this:

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country—the United States of America—are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of Europe.” USA Patriot Act.

Enough evidence has been gathered to show Jesuit infiltration throughout history, and still working today as part of the “elitist" power manipulating world politics to suit their aims and agenda.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Capitalism and Dialectics

An almost universal mindset is that communists and capitalists are bitter enemies. Although they appear to be on opposite sides of the political spectrum, they are actually both working for the same group. In fact, the elitists have as close working relations with communists and capitalists as they have with Marxists and Nazis.

World history since 1917 reflects an application of Hegelian dialectics. Those who finance and manage the clash of opposites can remain in control of the synthesis. Out of war and revolution come opportunities for profit by corporations under the control and influence of the elites.

There are numerous examples of American banks and corporations trading with the enemy side during the wars in history. The clash between left and right in the mid-1900s resulted in the synthesis—the formation of the UN and progression towards regional groups such as NATO, UNESCO, and the Trilateral Commission. The creation of these groups is part of the push towards a New World Order and one-world government.

In the past two decades, the hegemonic forces attempting to control the dialectic process and, subsequently, the world, have used different means but with the same motive: instead of war, information, debt, and technology are manipulated to gain and control world order.

Controlling Information
The perception that we are free is an illusion. Our world is very much controlled by elites who seek to lull us into a sleepy stupor so that we have no idea how much we are actually controlled on issues ranging from the price of gas and food to accurate information regarding health and drugs. As stated earlier, history textbooks are another example where information has been carefully selected and edited to present an authorized version of “the truth.”

The irony is that each country’s curriculum has its own varying and authorized versions of history. This manipulation of information demonstrates how Hegel’s psychology for the masses works—people think they’re free and hearing the truth when they’re really not. If someone only hears things that someone else wants him or her to hear, they will never fully know the whole story.

Controlling Debt
The use of debt as a control mechanism is clear. For governments, debt functions to maintain the status quo.

For instance, an individual in debt is not as likely to be choosy about jobs or willing to ask for a raise. In his Congressional testimony from February 26, 1997, US Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan commented that insecure workers who fear asking for a salary increase are good for the economy, keeping inflation low.xiii In other words, debt puts the lender in a position to control and manipulate the debtor.

This relationship doesn’t only occur at the individual-state level. Governments themselves are controlled by banks, essentially making both individuals and nations subject to financial institutions.

Controlling Technology
There are abundant examples of technology being used as a method of control. Air passengers must undergo numerous levels of security before boarding a flight. Security cameras exist on more street corners and other public places.

Social media sites like Twitter and Facebook can be used to identify users’ locations, as can pictures taken on smartphones and iPads. All these means steal our privacy, and ironically, instead of increasing our sense of security, they leave us feeling vulnerable.

Insofar as hegemonic forces seek to manage and control the common people through violence, the Hegelian world order has much in common with fascism, a radical nationalist political ideology that uses war and political violence to create national unity. This national unity, however, comes at the cost of purging people from society deemed inferior by the elite. This ideology, like Hegel’s, treats individuals as pawns for the sake of a larger goal. Read more about fascism here.

Both Hegelian dialectic thinking and the Jesuit motto Order Ab Chao are diabolical attitudes that aim at world domination. Many writers have written about the elite’s control over world issues, but there are also many sceptics. For those who are willing to look behind the obvious, the use of conflict to create a New World Order is a bitter but true fact.

 

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,081
Because that wahat nuclear station are -- their plan is to kill 99% of Humanity. They didn't care about Ukraine at all.
Nope try again. What cold war or other black box project lay below? This could be one of the whole reasons for the attack.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
Jesuits Behind Politics

Summary: Throughout history, the Jesuit Order has influenced governments and wars. Are the Jesuits still at work in politics today?


The Jesuit Order was created by Catholic Ignatius Loyola in 1500s to counter the Reformation and uplift the authority of the Papacy.

Read more about Loyola and the Jesuits' plan to destroy Protestantism

Since the beginning, the purpose of the Jesuits has included global political domination, as Loyola himself once said:

"Finally, Let all with such artfulness gain the ascendant over princes, noblemen, and the magistrates of every place, that they may be ready at our beck, even to sacrifice their nearest relations and most intimate friends, when we say it is for our interest and advantage (emphasis added)." i

The world's wars and revolutions occur because the Jesuits want to establish a one-world government with the Papacy at its head. Even over a century ago their plans were succeeding, as 19th-century theologian Luigi De Sanctis tells us:

"At what then do the Jesuits aim? According to them, they only seek the greater glory of God; but if you examine the facts you will find that they aim at universal dominion alone. They have rendered themselves indispensable to the Pope, who, without them, could not exist, because Catholicism is identified with them. They have rendered themselves indispensable to governors and hold revolutions in their hands; and in this way, either under one name or another, it is they who rule the world" (emphasis added). ii

As the sources below attest, the Jesuits have been involved in—and even spearheaded—many of the world's worst wars, revolutions, and massacres. At times, the Jesuits are directly involved, at other times, they use their influence over the Freemasons and other secret societies.
 

phipps

Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
4,242
The Jesuits and Other Secret Societies

Some people may not actually see Catholicism as being very powerful. There might be hints, but few see the fullness. This is because the Papacy doesn't want people to know how much political clout it holds. To prevent opposition, the Papacy uses the Jesuits to build its political empire.

The number of Jesuits is always up for debate, and even the best sources can't give matching accounts. The Society does not want us to know how many there really are. Often, they are hidden behind sodalities—other front secret societies:

"And we have it on good authority that the Jesuits have been active in forming other holy orders (or sodalities), such as the Knights of Peter Claver and the Knights of Columbus, over which they retain immense control. For it is an old trick on the part of the sons of Loyola, that whenever their Order is under threat or suspicion they swell their numbers by means of the sodalities of ‘new’ orders." iii

"Moreover, the Pope has thousands of secret agents worldwide. They include Jesuits, the Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, and others. The Vatican’s Intelligence Service and its field resources are second to none." iv

"There is considerable analogy between Masonic and Jesuitic degrees; and the Jesuits also tread down the shoe and bare the knee, because Ignatius Loyola thus presented himself at Rome and asked for the confirmation of the order." v

Read more about the Societies under Jesuit control

If anyone wanta to read more of this article, here is the link.

This is why the little horn power of Daniel 7, the first beast of Revelation 13, the harlot/whore/scarlet woman of Babylon in Revelation 17 all represent the papacy both politically and spiritually. It is this power that will implement the mark of the beast that the Bible warns us against in the strongest language possible (Revelation 13:16-17, 14:9-11). Right now its hard for many people to see how powerful the papacy is but in the end we will see its true colours. We want as Christians to be on the opposite side of everything it stands for or we will be lost eternally.
 
Last edited:
Top