Roe V. Wade To be overturned

Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Many people who seek abortions are in relationships or married
I'm against abortion, but unfortunately this is true. Ive spent time lurking on pregnancy forums and plenty of the women on there considering abortions are married. Some using birth control that failed too. Not excusing it, just saying.
Religious fanatics
Everyone's religious, just that some follow satanism or secular humanism.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
If anyone out there has any doubt still that abortion IS child sacrifice


The commenters seem to get it:

Pro aborts "It's not sacrifice! It's not killing!" Also pro aborts: Builds a literal death altar for human remains

I've never seen anyone do this to remove a tumor or a parasite

This is one of the most “Noah, get the boat” things I have ever seen

This is child sacrifice. Making an altar for an innocent human you killed like it's something beautiful is an awful thing.

This is so disturbing. It doesn't matter how calmly you speak, how beautiful you are, or how many good smells you add to the environment. It's still murder and you have built your entire practice upon death and injustice

As a society we are literally at a place where sacrificing the unborn in our own homes is cool, and YouTube is okay with it!!

This the new religion of the world. (And it looks suspiciously similar to the old ones).

Etc.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,368
If anyone out there has any doubt still that abortion IS child sacrifice


The commenters seem to get it:

Pro aborts "It's not sacrifice! It's not killing!" Also pro aborts: Builds a literal death altar for human remains

I've never seen anyone do this to remove a tumor or a parasite

This is one of the most “Noah, get the boat” things I have ever seen

This is child sacrifice. Making an altar for an innocent human you killed like it's something beautiful is an awful thing.

This is so disturbing. It doesn't matter how calmly you speak, how beautiful you are, or how many good smells you add to the environment. It's still murder and you have built your entire practice upon death and injustice

As a society we are literally at a place where sacrificing the unborn in our own homes is cool, and YouTube is okay with it!!

This the new religion of the world. (And it looks suspiciously similar to the old ones).

Etc.
I already figured a codeword was going to be "cathartic" and there it was within the videos first two sentences...will watch the rest but the writing was on the wall before I even pressed play.

Lets see... "reverence" "hold the experience in a sacred way" "I like to like... light some smoke" There she is "smudging" with some sage... this looks like its going to be a hodgepodge of misappropriated culture vulture catchphrases. "Mother Guadalupe... Mother Mary" Shes leaning hard on the Native symbolism and ritual from North American (Canada to Mexico). How disrespectful, to just "re-imagine" these Native ways and customs to run cover for the results/consequences of her modern, eugenics-fueled racist Abortion Industrial Complex (AIC). "I like to always have a candle on my alters" for "light in the darkness" if abortion wasnt a dark thing, why would she need it. Just waiting to hear "holistic"and "empowering" before the video is over... next is an "empress" tarot card to represent "feminine growing energy"... obvious reasons aside, why wouldnt she place the "death" card there? "A little tinker of ganesha there" Her misappropriating ways include Hindu Indians as well eh? Multi-culture vulture, but it was almost a guaranteed stop on her misery-train. "Sacred oil" does the vulture ever explain what makes it "sacred"? She wants to infuse the abortion pills with "blessings" by including them on her alter... is the spirit of Margret Sanger who she is calling on to import those "blessings"? More "smudging" with "Paulo Santo" to "put healing into the pills before you take them"... is this a parody? "Auga De Florida" there aint a stop on the Culture Vulture express this weirdo intends to skip is there? "A red cloth... why doesnt she explain why it should be red? Deep breath as she finally mentions "disposing" of the "fetal remains" after this "sacred abortion experience"...
"So much love" is an expression these hippy-dippy types like to trot out... it basically means "As long as Im getting mine and feeling good... who cares about anything else".

Time to look into this character, lets see... is she Native? Is she a practicing Hindu? Has she studied any of these "practices" with anyone who is? Is she connected to the actual AIC? Whats her background? Seems to be a very wrothwhile and reasonable investigation...
 

Lurking009

Veteran
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
638
Ok, Im trying to understand... is birth control BAD?

I noticed that when the Roe decision was overturned no one on the "conservative" side seemed very concerned about the possibility of banning birth control in the future, while the "liberals" were more concerned about the banning of gay marriage or gay acts.

Now I see that birth control was invented by Jews...

So, are we supposed to only have sex if we are open to a child at that point in life? As far as i know only catholics teach this, and I don't exactly trust them... but is that the correct view?

Any thoughts or opinions?
> I've found nothing in the Bible that says sex is strictly for procreation. If that were true, how awful that would be for barren couples. Sex within marriage physically fulfills us and should be enjoyed. It keeps us from lust and sexual sin outside of marriage -

1 Cor 7:2 But because of immoralities, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband. 3 Let the husband fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. 5 Stop depriving one another, except by agreement for a time that you may devote yourselves to prayer, and come together again lest Satan tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

Prov 5:18 Let your fountain be blessed, And rejoice in the wife of your youth. As a loving hind and a graceful doe, Let her breasts satisfy you at all times; Be exhilarated always with her love.


> 1Cor 7:9 is interesting in that widows can be sexually active but past child-bearing years, and the Bible still encourages them to marry in order to keep on doin' their thing -

1 Cor 7:9 But if they [the unmarried & widows] do not have self–control, let them marry; for it is better to marry than to burn.

> Children are a blessing, but not a requirement for salvation:

Gen 9:1 Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth.”
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
So much love" is an expression these hippy-dippy types like to trot out... it basically means "As long as Im getting mine and feeling good... who cares about anything else".
So true!

is the spirit of Margret Sanger who she is calling on to import those "blessings"?
About that...

Worth a read. Some snippets:


Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood was such a randy squirrel her critics framed her as the "Father of Modern Society". Celebrated heroine of the servants of Molech, she was a well known eugenicist.

Few, however, know that she was the proxy of a s*x magic sorcerer.

Sadly, Sanger was initiated into the world of desperate perverts when she was only nine years old. Margaret, sick with typhoid and barely coherent, awoke to find her father pressed against her in bed. She described a *sense of falling* and labeled it as her first “s*x awakening".

Another formative event— days after the death of her four-year-old brother, Henry, Margaret accompanied her father for a strange ritual in the cemetery where Henry had been buried.

Many call Sanger a eugenicist and compare her to "Nazis", but she was never exposed to National Socialism. She was however the fanatical disciple of the s*xologist and Fabian Society founder Henry Havelock Ellis, who was deeply involved in "spiritual Darwinism" and the occult.

Consider the rousing conclusion to her first book, Woman and the New Race, where she clearly spells out the tenets of spiritualist necromancy.

The profound biological impact the mother’s emotional and mental well-being had on the embryonic child was a significant part of the reason why “the unwanted child” had to be so carefully avoided.


Sanger's mentor Havelock Ellis was the iconoclastic grandfather of the Bohemian s*xual revolution. He staged elaborate orgies for his Malthusian and Eugenicist friends; he enticed his wife into innumerable lesbian affairs while he quietly observed.

Ellis was connected through his fellow mescal enthusiast W.B. Yeats, to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Close friends and fellow Fabians Annie Besant, E. Nesbit and Herbert Burrows were also members of the magical order.

...
And so on, down the rabbit hole.


Seems to be a very wrothwhile and reasonable investigation...
That may have been a typo, but it's very fitting. God is indeed wroth at these abominations.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
I've found nothing in the Bible that says sex is strictly for procreation. If that were true, how awful that would be for barren couples. Sex within marriage physically fulfills us and should be enjoyed. It keeps us from lust and sexual sin outside of marriage -
I agree, and i haven't found anything that says that either. Great point about the widows past childbearing age being encouraged to marry!

I guess the reason I started questioning it is because I haven't heard anything from the conservative side about concern for lack of access to birth control. If anything its been a lot of assuming only single promiscuous people use birth control, which is obviously not true.

As this is a "conspiracy" forum I'll just put it out there that i found it very bizarre that the supreme court threatened to go after birth control. Almost like if the goal was to mobilize the moderate people to side with the leftists.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,368
So true!



About that...

Worth a read. Some snippets:


Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood was such a randy squirrel her critics framed her as the "Father of Modern Society". Celebrated heroine of the servants of Molech, she was a well known eugenicist.

Few, however, know that she was the proxy of a s*x magic sorcerer.

Sadly, Sanger was initiated into the world of desperate perverts when she was only nine years old. Margaret, sick with typhoid and barely coherent, awoke to find her father pressed against her in bed. She described a *sense of falling* and labeled it as her first “s*x awakening".

Another formative event— days after the death of her four-year-old brother, Henry, Margaret accompanied her father for a strange ritual in the cemetery where Henry had been buried.

Many call Sanger a eugenicist and compare her to "Nazis", but she was never exposed to National Socialism. She was however the fanatical disciple of the s*xologist and Fabian Society founder Henry Havelock Ellis, who was deeply involved in "spiritual Darwinism" and the occult.

Consider the rousing conclusion to her first book, Woman and the New Race, where she clearly spells out the tenets of spiritualist necromancy.

The profound biological impact the mother’s emotional and mental well-being had on the embryonic child was a significant part of the reason why “the unwanted child” had to be so carefully avoided.


Sanger's mentor Havelock Ellis was the iconoclastic grandfather of the Bohemian s*xual revolution. He staged elaborate orgies for his Malthusian and Eugenicist friends; he enticed his wife into innumerable lesbian affairs while he quietly observed.

Ellis was connected through his fellow mescal enthusiast W.B. Yeats, to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Close friends and fellow Fabians Annie Besant, E. Nesbit and Herbert Burrows were also members of the magical order.

...
And so on, down the rabbit hole.



That may have been a typo, but it's very fitting. God is indeed wroth at these abominations.
EXCELLENT info! Thank you for posting this because a lot of dots just got connected. And yes, it was a typo... but even a broken analog clock can be correct twice a day so score one for the good guys lol
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,368
"As this is a "conspiracy" forum I'll just put it out there that i found it very bizarre that the supreme court threatened to go after birth control. Almost like if the goal was to mobilize the moderate people to side with the leftists."
Thats a powerful observation.
 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
6,169
this made me cry and become so angry
it's one of the most sickest I've Heard
since the lautir crap from the s/temple

if these peoples if We can even call
them that anymore at this point were in
front of me I don't think I would be able to
hold back becoming physical

 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
16,104
this made me cry and become so angry
it's one of the most sickest I've Heard
since the lautir crap from the s/temple

if these peoples if We can even call
them that anymore at this point were in
front of me I don't think I would be able to
hold back becoming physical

The very words that they say against God's innocent children...will be used to condemn them...

This kind of women are the devil's "mouthpiece..."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.
 
Last edited:

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,368
this made me cry and become so angry
it's one of the most sickest I've Heard
since the lautir crap from the s/temple

if these peoples if We can even call
them that anymore at this point were in
front of me I don't think I would be able to
hold back becoming physical

I couldnt listen to all of it but they were lying when they played dumb and said "Theres got to be a fetish for this" because they obviously know one already exists... hence their content. A Rolling Stone article from quite a while back had Marylin Manson talking about taking girlfriends in for very late-term abortions and how "intense" it was. Even back then, it didnt take a genius to read between the lines and recognize he was talking about fulfilling his breeding fetish by getting females pregnant and then coercing/forcing them into late term abortions to complete the sacrifice. This world desperately needs God.
 

e-Enoch

Superstar
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
16,104
This world desperately needs God.
Absolutely. Only through the ultimate sacrifice of The Lord & Savior Jesus Christ...is our salvation...

John 3:16
King James Version

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a court case that would have given the unborn personhood rights.
If given personhood rights, like they have been in Georgia, it would be possible to pregnant women or the families to claim the unborn child as a dependent on taxes during the pregnancy.

This would have also helped out poor women who are considering adoption financially, and anything that helps more women choose life is good in my opinion. I lurk on a mom forum and there are so many women struggling between what they know is wrong and extreme poverty.


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America’s culture wars.
The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.
The Supreme Court earlier this year overturned Roe v Wade which ultimately gave states the right to set their own abortion laws.
...
Georgia recently passed a ‘fetal personhood’ law that grants fetuses various legal rights.

According to a recent announcement made by the Georgia Department of Revenue, pregnant mothers in the state can now include their unborn child as a dependent on their tax returns.

“In light of the June 24, 2022, U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the July 20, 2022, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Sistersong v. Kemp, the Department will recognize any unborn child with a detectable human heartbeat, as eligible for the Georgia individual income tax dependent exemption,” the agency announced on its website Monday.

On individual income tax returns for Tax Year 2022, a taxpayer with an unborn child (or children) with a detectable human heartbeat (which may occur as early as six weeks’ gestation) may claim a $3,000 dependent personal exemption for each unborn child.

“Similar to any other deduction claimed on an income tax return, relevant medical records or other supporting documentation shall be provided to support the dependent deduction claimed if requested by the Department,” the agency said.
My personal commentary: this confirms that the supreme court does not care about the murder of the unborn, and that Roe being overturned may just be a step in the direction of eliminating "rights" that fall under the due process or equal protection clause. If there's no right to medical privacy that makes it more likely to pass v@x mandates or forced microchipping.
 

Lucy

Star
Joined
Feb 8, 2021
Messages
1,670
The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a court case that would have given the unborn personhood rights.
If given personhood rights, like they have been in Georgia, it would be possible to pregnant women or the families to claim the unborn child as a dependent on taxes during the pregnancy.

This would have also helped out poor women who are considering adoption financially, and anything that helps more women choose life is good in my opinion. I lurk on a mom forum and there are so many women struggling between what they know is wrong and extreme poverty.




My personal commentary: this confirms that the supreme court does not care about the murder of the unborn, and that Roe being overturned may just be a step in the direction of eliminating "rights" that fall under the due process or equal protection clause. If there's no right to medical privacy that makes it more likely to pass v@x mandates or forced microchipping.
TocixFeminitySucks
Personally, I always felt there was an ulterior motive behind over turning Roe Vs Wade.
I agree, the Supreme Court does not truly care about the murder of the unborn. I was literally stunned while listening to a Christian station in the car the other day and heard that over 50 percent of abortions before Roe was even overturned were from the abortion pill.
Most woman are now having an abortion in the comfort of their own home. I was in shock!
I'm sure that number is rising. So the evil people in control allowed Roe to be overturned because home abortions are skyrocketing. Mother's are still killing their babies at an alarming rate.
So while I rejoiced with the victory, because babies are being saved. The evil elites in power knew that most abortions now are from the abortion pill which they developed.
I originally thought there would be much more division and riots over their decision , but after your post and comment I realize my feelings were right that something bigger was being planned from this decision.
There is of course a sinister reason why The Supreme Court overturned Roe at this time.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,368
The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a court case that would have given the unborn personhood rights.
If given personhood rights, like they have been in Georgia, it would be possible to pregnant women or the families to claim the unborn child as a dependent on taxes during the pregnancy.

This would have also helped out poor women who are considering adoption financially, and anything that helps more women choose life is good in my opinion. I lurk on a mom forum and there are so many women struggling between what they know is wrong and extreme poverty.




My personal commentary: this confirms that the supreme court does not care about the murder of the unborn, and that Roe being overturned may just be a step in the direction of eliminating "rights" that fall under the due process or equal protection clause. If there's no right to medical privacy that makes it more likely to pass v@x mandates or forced microchipping.
Its infuriating that pregnant females havent already had access to these benefits and special status'. But in the continued deniance, there is the continued lie that kids in the womb aint kids, which allows for the abortion excuses and ultimatley is what the "pro-choice" argument rests on.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
TocixFeminitySucks
Personally, I always felt there was an ulterior motive behind over turning Roe Vs Wade.
I agree, the Supreme Court does not truly care about the murder of the unborn. I was literally stunned while listening to a Christian station in the car the other day and heard that over 50 percent of abortions before Roe was even overturned were from the abortion pill.
Most woman are now having an abortion in the comfort of their own home. I was in shock!
I'm sure that number is rising. So the evil people in control allowed Roe to be overturned because home abortions are skyrocketing. Mother's are still killing their babies at an alarming rate.
So while I rejoiced with the victory, because babies are being saved. The evil elites in power knew that most abortions now are from the abortion pill which they developed.
I originally thought there would be much more division and riots over their decision , but after your post and comment I realize my feelings were right that something bigger was being planned from this decision.
There is of course a sinister reason why The Supreme Court overturned Roe at this time.
I absolutely agree.

It seemed to me to be a political move, a way to mobilize the leftist crowd under the pretense of "our rights are being taken away!", by "rights" them only meaning killing babies and gay marriages. Meanwhile, the "conservatives" seemed to be just celebrating without noting that first of all, the unborn were not being given personhood, and second of all, this opens the door to revisiting many cases that could have a far reaching impact in individual privacy rights.

Then specifically Justice Thomas's concurring opinion on married couples not having the right to birth control was bizarre. Even more bizarre that all the "conservative" commentaries in it either ignored this or even tried to play it off as a good thing. This seemed to me a way to turn "moderates" towards the left.

And yes, hardly any mention of the fact that most abortions were being done through pills over the mail. If i remember correctly, the supreme court decided during the plandemic that it was an "essential" service for planned parenthood to mail abortion pills to anyone during lockdowns, no questions asked. As far as i know this has remained in place even after businesses reopened in person.

And if i remember correctly the decision was anounced on 6/24/2022 6/6/6
 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
6,169
it's also to do as it's doing with some
getting a full blown hysterectomy so
they can't get pregnant,which is not
reversible if down the road Ya decided
Ya wanted a Child after all

Helps with population control by Peoples
sterilizing themselves by choice,it Helps in
dividing/distracting/fighting/protests etc...

it keeps Us from focusing on the actual things
We should be focusing on instead of still allowing
these evils to divide Us with these petty divides
they have used for way too long now
 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
6,169
of course he'd veto it,they will not
allow that revenue of Children to be
taken from them,We are dealing with
pure ancient evil that have been in power
forever now

too bad even if banned/outlawed w/e it
will not stop them killing Children they'll
go back to hiding it is all that will/is going
on now

only in today's backwards world where women
have freedom as We're gaining Our "equality" to
go and get themselves sterilized or use pills to
murder a Child many will choose these options

 
Top