Richard Dawkins p***philia Remarks Provoke Outrage

Joined
Mar 26, 2017
Messages
4,016
Likes
6,900
#1
From the Huffington Post: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/richard-dawkins-pedophilia_n_3895514.html

CANTERBURY, England (RNS) Richard Dawkins, one of the world’s best-known and outspoken atheists, has provoked outrage among child protection agencies and experts after suggesting that recent child abuse scandals have been overblown.

In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild p***philia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.

Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”

He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”

“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild p***philia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.

He said the most notorious cases of p***philia involve r*pe and even murder and should not be bracketed with what he called “just mild touching up.”

Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and the interview was released on the eve of the publication of his autobiography, An Appetite for Wonder, on Thursday.

Peter Watt, director of child protection at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, called Dawkins’ remarks “a terrible slight” on those who have been abused and suffered the effects for decades.

“Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way,” Watt said. “But we know that the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects whether it was 50 years ago or yesterday.”

Peter Saunders, founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood and himself a victim of abuse, told The Times that Dawkins’ comments were worrying and unhelpful, adding: “Abuse in all its forms has always been wrong. Evil is evil and we have to challenge it whenever and wherever it occurs.”
 





Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
2,334
Likes
2,779
#2
To condemn such things would be to condemn himself... can't have that now, can we?

How much you want to bet? I just smh
 





mecca

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
6,183
Likes
10,249
#3
“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild p***philia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.
Wow that's complete bullshit.
 





Hubert

Established
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
267
Likes
439
#4
Well, it's seems like Dawkins has a twisted opinion about child molestation. O well, it's a five year old article and it doesn't change any of his other arguments. For example all of his arguments against the existence of gods are still perfectly sound.
 





Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
2,334
Likes
2,779
#6
Well, it's seems like Dawkins has a twisted opinion about child molestation. O well, it's a five year old article and it doesn't change any of his other arguments. For example all of his arguments against the existence of gods are still perfectly sound.
He also thinks child abuse is no big deal but yeah.. after 50 years, or 5 years, in this case, the wrongness just kind of faaades awaaay... :rolleyes: