results of my EMF meter

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Correlation is still not causation Justless. There is probably something else going on which is neither vaccines, wifi or radio signals.
I know correlation is not causation, but something has been causing it and when I think of the communities which have much lower rates two things stand out - very little modern technology and organic food.
 

elsbet

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
5,122
true-- that would work. i used to use the old jiffy pop ones on the stove.

like i always say, just do your best. as long as you arent spending a lot of time near these things, you should be fine. just keep the head of your bed (where your head is, at least) away from the electrical socket.
Ugh.. naturally I charge my phone using the outlet at head of my bed. -.- Another thread on here said it was good, I think, that the head of the bed was facing east. I'm gonna check that real quick.

** Nope.. its southeast. So is the outlet. Obviously.
 
Last edited:

Glad 2 know

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
730
Literally no "Expert" says that radiations don't cause cancer. They do, after causing mutations in the DNA.
BUT there are types of radiation and waves, some harmful and some not. And you'd be stupid to put sun's uv rays on the same level sound waves from your ringtone. The earth produces emf. When you run your body generates it as well due to friction lmao.
Natural EMFs and radiation are not harmful to us, it is the man-made kind we're talking about here.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Natural EMFs and radiation are not harmful to us, it is the man-made kind we're talking about here.
"Natural good, man-made bad"

Say that to the Sun's uv-rays and to natural radioactive elements such as uranium.
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
8,216
"Natural good, man-made bad"

Say that to the Sun's uv-rays and to natural radioactive elements such as uranium.
uranium is not supposed to be exposed on the earths surface. we mine for that (and then refine it so its more dangerous).
UV certainly causes damage to the skin and the DNA, but i will sit in the sun and you can sit under a cell phone tower. we can see who gets sick first.
 

Glad 2 know

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
730
"Natural good, man-made bad"

You said it! :) yes! natural is good, man made is bad (most of the time)
Say that to the Sun's uv-rays and to natural radioactive elements such as uranium.
I have spent lots of time in the sun, my relatives have too and none of us have developed any cancer. God would not have created something that would intentionally cause humanity harm. Just because genes and people's constitutions have weakened over time, that doesn't mean that UV was always cancer-causing.

We're not supposed to mess with Uranium. Some things are to be left alone and everything's good.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
uranium is not supposed to be exposed on the earths surface. we mine for that (and then refine it so its more dangerous).
Except uranium is easily found in air, just in a lesser and thus non-toxic quantity.


UV certainly causes damage to the skin and the DNA, but i will sit in the sun and you can sit under a cell phone tower. we can see who gets sick first.
I have spent lots of time in the sun, my relatives have too and none of us have developed any cancer. God would not have created something that would intentionally cause humanity harm. Just because genes and people's constitutions have weakened over time, that doesn't mean that UV was always cancer-causing.

We're not supposed to mess with Uranium. Some things are to be left alone and everything's good.
lmfaooooo I thought the "sun is safe" people were a myth, i guess not.
Skin tan and sunburn are both skin damage caused by the sun's rays. If you have gotten either by sitting in the sun, you've sat in the sun long enough to cause cancer but just been lucky.
And putting a cell phone tower on the same level of danger as uv rays is paranoia.
 
Last edited:

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
yeah, non-toxic, like your thimerosal. lmfaoooooo.
You don't have to laugh that hard at your own idiocy. You're eating uranium everyday, turning blind to the fact doesn't make it not true.
And thimerosal IS safe especially in small doses. Believing otherwise is ignorance.
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
8,216
You don't have to laugh that hard at your own idiocy. You're eating uranium everyday, turning blind to the fact doesn't make it not true.
And thimerosal IS safe especially in small doses. Believing otherwise is ignorance.
go ahead and show us. drink that mercury and show us.

i think i know who you are now:

 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
go ahead and show us. drink that mercury and show us.

i think i know who you are now:

You've been parroting the same thing for the last 2 years even after your claims have been debunked along with proper reasons and facts. Getting kind of pathetic at this point but then again i didn't expect anything else either.

And if you don't understand the term "dosage" you're a lost cause.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
That can't be it. The FDA has researched (in a lab) all the chemicals and excitotoxins that are added to food and they say they're safe.
Yeah and I got this bridge in Brooklyn... (I know u were being sarcastic)
 
Last edited:

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
You don't have to laugh that hard at your own idiocy. You're eating uranium everyday, turning blind to the fact doesn't make it not true.
And thimerosal IS safe especially in small doses. Believing otherwise is ignorance.
Would you agree that there is a stark difference between eating something and injecting it? If not, test your beliefs by injecting air.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Would you agree that there is a stark difference between eating something and injecting it? If not, test your beliefs by injecting air.
Literally the same argument i put forward against you lot like a month ago lol. Originality not found.
Some things are safe being injected and not eaten and vice versa and like i said "dosage" is a thing. Too much air can also kill you as air pressure is a thing.
 

Glad 2 know

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
730
Except uranium is easily found in air, just in a lesser and thus non-toxic quantity.




lmfaooooo I thought the "sun is safe" people were a myth, i guess not.
Skin tan and sunburn are both skin damage caused by the sun's rays. If you have gotten either by sitting in the sun, you've sat in the sun long enough to cause cancer but just been lucky.
And putting a cell phone tower on the same level of danger as uv rays is paranoia.
Well I have only gotten sunburn and suntan while at the beach. I have not been lucky, my ancestors have worked under the sun for generations so I inherited their strong genes.
 

Glad 2 know

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
730
View attachment 21185


i recently bought an EMF meter from amazon for 168 USD. i got the trifield EMF meter model TF2 after sorting through the reviews, prices, and comments. i then spent about 20 minutes roaming around the house checking things out, and this thread is to provide the reader with some insight about their own house/environment without spending the money.

first, here are the safe levels according to the paper enclosed:
magnetic fields: 3 mG or less
electric fields: 50 V/m or less
RF fields: 1.0 mW or less

here are my findings:

- the microwave, if you are still using one, throws off a HUGE amount of RF. i was still getting a significant (unsafe) reading over 25 feet away, through doors. if i am getting a reading so far away, one can imagine what its doing to the food inside. of course, there are slight variances in models, but DONT USE IT.

- regular outlets in the walls toss off about 200 (average) V/m. as one moves inches away from them, it drops significantly. the magnetic field drops off after 6 inches, and the electric field is insignificant beyond 1 foot. as long as you dont spend time close to the outlet, its not a problem. i would imagine it would be a good idea to keep food away from the outlet, but i dont know for sure. my light switches are about the same, but there is a light switchplate with 3 switches on it in the kitchen-- 2 toggle switches and 1 dimmer. that spot is throwing off over 900 V/m, so the more complex, the worse it is.

- fridge: theres an older (well, 2008ish?) model in the kitchen that has an icemaker/water dispenser, bottom pullout freezer with a two-door fridge. the display where the water is dispensed is putting out a LOT of EMF. theres a good 200 V/m inside the fridge, which is bathing the food in that field, but i cannot comment on whether or not its causing significant damage to the food nutritive value or not. i cant imagine its good for it, at least.

- flat screen TV in the living room: i received much higher levels of EMF from the edge of the screen than the middle of the screen. the EMF again drops off significantly beyond a foot, so youll want to keep some distance from it.

- home wireless phone: the electric field isnt significant (70 V/m), but i was very surprised about the RF coming off of the device. although not as dangerous as the wifi router, it spikes at 6 mW when not in use, off of the charging stand. the safe way to do it, according to the meter, is to put the thing on speaker phone and be at LEAST 6 feet away from the phone to bring it down to 1 mW or less.

- desktop computer: im a desktop guy. i hate laptops and their finger pad mouse pads. the worst part of the computer tower is the back bottom (possibly because it has the antenna on it for the wifi?). thats spitting out 600 V/m. as i move the meter up, the top of the tower is only 150. the front gives off 150 as well, SO.... keep the back of the tower away from you if youve got a desktop.
the router (arris brand) is giving off 8+ mW of radiation from the side of it. by simply pushing it back, i can get it down to .3 mW. the monitor of the desktop, right up close peaks at 3.3, but drops off to a peak of 1.5 within normal viewing range (3 feet away or so).

now for the big kahuna. the wifi...

i went into the computer room and was aghast at the readings. it was giving off 70 m/W, and that was with the ormusite plate under the thing. now, the ormusite (got that one from freshandalive.com) MIGHT be making the waves coherent instead of erratic, but 70 is a LOT. i went downstairs and came back with some aluminum foil and wrapped it up. new reading next to the device: 10. 2 feet away: .5 m/V. i havent tested any devices to see if the signal is interrupted or not (probably), but i will follow up on that.

what we learned:
keep you, your pets, and anything organic (plants, food, etc.) at least 1.5 feet away from outlets and light switches.
toss your microwave, or at least dont use it.
keep the computer monitor at least 3 feet from you.
keep your cordless phone at least 6 feet from you and use the speakerphone.
if you have light dimmers, putting the lights on 1/2 (half dimmed) you might save money, but it does nothing for the electric field given off. you need to crank it down to 1/4 or less, and at that point, you really cant see anything in the room.
CO (carbon monoxide) monitors in the house give off 900 V/m near the device. again, it drops off significantly several inches away.

the point where two electric cords meet is a huge electric spike zone. so if you have an extension cord that plugs into a surge protector, keep that away from your feet!

to your health,
moog
I want to get one too. I want to show my friends how much radiation those newly-installed smart meters are giving off.
 
Top