A) The 2009 Brookings Institution paper titled, “
Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran,” US policymakers would openly admit:
…it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it.
B)
AIPAC and WINEP
C) Tom Neumann, executive director of Jinsa, spelled out the plan in clear, cold terms:
"Jordan will likely survive the coming war with US assistance, so will some of the sheikhdoms. The current Saudi regime will likely not.
"The Iran dissident movement would be helped enormously by the demise of Saddam, and the Palestinians would have to know that the future lies with the West. Syria's Ba'athist dictatorship will likely fall unmourned, liberating Lebanon as well.
"Israel and Turkey, the only current democracies in the region, will find themselves in a far better neighbourhood." Would anyone like to bet on that?
JINSA
_________________
I wonder, when the big and revered names in the Evangelical world talk about this subject, of Gog and Magog, why is the information above never mentioned? Is it highly irrelevant or just inconvenient truth?
As one, who will straight up own to being so hopelessly blind to Gog and Magog happening before mine eyes, I ask you: does this prophecy, by any chance, accommodate geopolitical shenanigans a.k.a falseflags coming from Israel and her staunch “ally”, the USA to induce Armageddon? Or is it just the case of evil, angry Persians, Russians and Muslims descending on sweet and innocent Israel, without any provocation whatsoever? If the latter is the case, what am I to make of the work/position of the numerous Washington think tanks that call for Israeli aggression in any and every possible way?
When our fave televangelists get up to teach on this subject, why is end-time, unprovoked, Israeli aggression so painfully absent from their talks despite available evidence? And this begs the question: are their prophetic interpretations reliable/legit given how much is omitted or are they merely furthering an agenda: for whom and to what end? I’ve never heard anything about this intrigue from Pat Robertson or Hagee or Perry Stone etc. They are always quick to pull up the headlines, dwelling on the Middle East, to emphasize to the audience that the Second Advent is at hand and prophecies are being fullfilled but never give a balanced view of what’s going on/what’s driving the chaos in the ME. Even more, your average Conspiracy theorist-Christian Zionist blogger won’t touch the other side of the equation to ME chaos, is it just too inconvenient or belief-shattering, to address?
If it is oil, why would the presumed enemies do that? Russia has its own oil, and there’s more in the Arctic. So does Iran and Libya. Maybe China is the exception here.