maybe we should forcibly include non-whites on the forum to be more inclusive.Dang. VC so white.
Excuse me??maybe we should forcibly include non-whites on the forum to be more inclusive.
or we can start kicking out white people.
Same happened with "gay", which meant to be happy.Since this post is called 'the reclaiming of slur words'.. I would like to offer another one.. 'fagot'. Fagot in British English always meant a stick that was lit on fire in British English until the early 1900's.. when they changed the meaning to 'homosexual'. How did that happen?
nah, it's in-group vs out-group dynamic. I can't go to a gay person and call them faggot if I don't belong to that scene. Juts like you can't say the n-word if you're not black. It's not that complicated.the fact that words can be "reclaimed" to be acceptable illustrates how ridiculous the concept of "hate speech" is.
I don’t identify myself/heritage by a color so no. But you might say I was black so yes? Hopefully you get what I’m getting at.I didn't know that.
...are you even black tho?
of course i was being facetious, but you said, "dang, VC is so white". maybe i read you wrong initially, but if the forum attracts more white people (or whatever race/culture), so be it.Maybe I'm misunderstanding you. But that seems racist, or reverse racism. Idk I'm not the go-to guy when it comes to racial tensions. Seriously though, I think we are pretty inclusive. However, we should consider we may be pushing people away unintentionally.
i dont agree with that. its either acceptable or not acceptable for everyone to say.nah, it's in-group vs out-group dynamic. I can't go to a gay person and call them faggot if I don't belong to that scene. Juts like you can't say the n-word if you're not black. It's not that complicated.
Obviously there’s a history behind one word that just isn’t present behind the other. You’re smart enough to not need that exlainedwhy does the 'n' word get special treatment?