I disagree.
TBH I have seen his stuff.
Here is his website for others to peruse.
http://www.imranhosein.org/articles/signs-of-the-last-day/76-ten-major-signs-of-the-last-day-has-one-just-occurred.html
From what I have seen he sticks to Islamic prophecies from the Quran and Sunnah.
Second, the original video I posted has nothing to do with Imran Hosein I only used his video as a back up to the fact that some Muslims believe Israel to be the dahbat al Ard (The beast of the earth or land most likely the holy land ),whilst others do think it is an actual beast,
Ultimately, I am not as invested in End times prophecies as you seem to be.
Our state of God conscious worship and correct belief is more important.
Really you surprise me. You are so frickin' strange with your worship and views.
However I supported your weird stances as long as you believed God is 1 and Unique (Islamic Monotheism).
THE BIBLE IS NOT USED AS A CREDIBLE SOURCE IN ISLAM.
https://islamqa.info/en/209007
The Torah and Gospel were originally from Allah, may He be exalted, and we are obliged to believe in them because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Say (O Muslims), ‘We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibraaheem (Abraham), Ismaa‘eel (Ishmael), Ishaaq (Isaac), Ya‘qoob (Jacob), and to Al-Asbaat (the twelve sons of Ya‘qoob (Jacob)), and that which has been given to Moosa (Moses) and ‘Eesa (Jesus), and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam)’”
[al-Baqarah 2:136]
“O you who believe! Believe in Allah, and His Messenger (Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)), and the Book (the Quran) which He has sent down to His Messenger, and the Scripture which He sent down to those before (him), and whosoever disbelieves in Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Last Day, then indeed he has strayed far away”
[an-Nisa’ 4:136].
However,
"......the Torah and Gospel were subjected to distortion and changes. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say, "This is from Allah," to purchase with it a little price! Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for that they earn thereby”
[al-Baqarah 2:79].
Once again, it is frankly none of your business what or who I post. bruh.
It is my business though, i'm a muslim and I take offense to anything that promotes his dajjalic message, that is a serious accusation, do you care to know where the hell this is coming from? i'll explain, but you might not really pay notice to what im about to say.
You said
I disagree.
TBH I have seen his stuff.
you're not familiar with those themes though, so you simply do not know.
"From what I have seen he sticks to Islamic prophecies from the Quran and Sunnah."
Again because you haven't studied the bible prophecies, you do not know where imran hossein has actually used their background to present his 'islamic' opinion in a dangerous way, i'll explain this in a short while.
Now granted, you do not agree with all the things he says. However ive gone further to accuse him of distorting the Quranic verses in numerous ways, I don't trust him at all and have called HIM dajjalic, it is a pretty huge accusation given he is the dude who constantly talks about dajjal, funny no?
The least i can do, is explain my position by dissecting his points.
-Read Surah 21.
https://www.searchtruth.com/chapter_display.php?chapter=21&translator=2
In this Surah, Allah referred to the nations who were destroyed (like Ad, Sodom and Gomorrah)
6(As to those) before them, not one of the populations which We destroyed believed: will these believe?
9 In the end We fulfilled to them Our Promise, and We saved them and those whom We pleased, but We destroyed those who transgressed beyond bounds.
11 How many were the populations We utterly destroyed because of their iniquities, setting up in their places other peoples?
hence you get
95 But there is a ban on any population which We have destroyed: that they shall not return,
96 Until the Gog and Magog (people) are let through (their barrier), and they swiftly swarm from every hill.
This is a reference tot he resurrection on the day of judgement ie all the previous nations/people will return.
However as you already know Imran Hossein distorted this to suggest israel is Gog & Magog. His distortion by itself was beyond stupid for a man who is meant to be educated and preaching to the masses.
you know because obvious points stick out like
-jews were not 'banned' nor were they destroyed, they were punished. Surah 17 tells us this clearly.
BUT
his distortion has deeper implications.
In Ezekiel 38 we're told of the end times invasion of Gog & Magog.
Before you even think to judge this reference. There is a lengthy hadith prophecy telling us about Gog & Magog which basically matches much of what is in Ezekiel 38/39 but it doesn't mention who Gog & Magog are by race.
To me, this is an illustration amongst so many of the prophetic link (but ill get back to this point too).
Ezekiel 38 does tell us about the identity of Gog & Magog.
Russia, Iran, Turkey amongst others.
This event occurs long after 'modern israel' is destroyed and Isa AS has already appeared.
Meanwhile the israelis and neo-christians are applying this into the current age.
Imran Hossein is batting for the otherside, he's working for Russia.So all he's done is pushed the idea that Israeli jews are Gog & Magog.
he's twisted the Quran and the Bible in a single stroke just because he's working for russia.
It doesn't end there.
The dabbat al ardh is in the Quran, one of the end times signs of Allah (a positive sign) and he's attacked that too, as israel.
there is NO question on this, don't even tell me 'whether t is israel or a literal beast'
it is one of the positive signs of Allah ie the 'dabbat al ardh' will defend islam. how the hell can it be israel?
However the implications turn 'dajjalic' when you understand what it is he's actually pushing. It is a hatred for modern israel....
without understanding what this connects to.
modern israel is dajjal's trick, a decoy...
whoever destroys israel...who is that guy?
In the bible, Isa AS destroys the beast.
if the beast is israel....
you get the idea?
of course thisi s based on imran hossein's mixing up the beast in Revelation to the dabbat al ardh even though they are not the same event/person/thing.
As for my position on the bible as a whole.
The Quran speaks in the present tense. Meaning at the time the verses were reveled the Quran had confirmed the validity/truth of the Torah and Gospel.
It addressed the Jews & Christians to believe in what Allah had revealed to them.
Any textual alterations of the torah occured long before the Prophet SAW and even before Isa AS.
What Allah and the Prophet SAW accused the jews of is actually the very same thing Isa AS and Jeremiah AS accused them of too.
Jeremiah 8:8
How can you say, 'We are wise, And the law of the LORD is with us'? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes Has made it into a lie
do you really think if jews were altering their own scripture this would exist?
how about the long line of prophets, how come none of them said 'this is distorted, take it out?'
What the verse actually refers to is MISINTERPRETATIONS and mistranslations.
get it?
this is the same goddamned thing Imran Hossein, Mohsin Khan and so many others have done, literally this same accusation applies to muslims.
The Prophet SAW went further because he held the Torah in his hand and said 'I believe in you'.
The verses from the Torah were referred to as 'sacred verses'
The context behind the Prophet SAW's anger when the sahaba 'read the torah' was because they were reading an arabic 'torah' translated by the jews who were at the same time working against the muslims. Basic common sense, 'do not trust them, they say it is from Allah but it isn't'.
You're not properly familiar with this subject as a whole but i'll go as far as to say that the bible as a whole has far more validity than the hadith.
I accept the hadith as valuable sources of information, but the Quran never 'confirmed' any of them and there has not been another prophet to confirm any of them. Yet I still believe in the majority inspite of being aware of the abbasid caliphates hidden influence throughout the hadith.
Last point, the actions and sayings of the Prophet SAW were based on Hikmah.
throughout the Quran, Allah told us HE taught the Rasools a book and the hikmah/wisdom.
There is no mention of 'sunnah' in a sense. Although the Quran does tell us to 'follow the messenger' but even here you got to consider the context. Allah was addressing those specific muslims who lived during the time these verses were revealed, who could physically see/talk to the prophet SAW.
hadith are sources of historical information which do contain the hikmah of the Prophet SAW but they are not divine scripture.
In the bible, chronicles and kings are 2 examples of historical information that aren't divinely inspired.
Contradictions do exist in the 4 gospel accounts but historically even those contradictions have a context and a hikmah.
Just like contradictions existing in the prophets own statement's in the hadith
contexts change.
Does the ave muslim understand this when they begin quoting and saying 'the Prophet SAW said/did this or that'?
For example, the jews rejected Isa AS precisely because he challenged the contexts behind the mosaic law.
The jews challenged him on the law of stoning for example.
Why do you think the jews then challenged Prophet SAW with the same law?
This time the Prophet SAW decided not to challenge the context but to directly make them follow their law and then they didn't like that either.
Yet if you apply that precise position of the Prophet SAW to a modern Muslim context, it causes nothing but problems. What is missing? it's hikmah.
by studying the bible i'm able to gain insight into various contexts and subsequent events.
No muslim should preach against studying the bible in the modern age where there are multiple translations we can confirm against one another, there are scholars, historians etc.
it is a lot different to one of the sahaba reading a random jewish 'arabic' torah where you can't trust anything you're reading.
However if you have bias and ego issues you'll always fail like zakir naik.
