If Christianity had no decent moral arguments in the distant past to convert with and that is why they used inquisitions to grow.
Perhaps.
As I said earlier, nobody need to fear judgment when you have clean hands.
Satan wasn't a requirement for men to commit sin.
No, the thing is you make things up.
What religion ?
At least Christ won't throw rocks at people to prove a point. I can't say the same for you.
Now you project, you lie all the time and you're unable to explain how God considers evil as good.
I wish it were.
The growth of christianity has nothing to do with inquisition.
Are you okay to say that morality come from the word moralis which means behaving good?
According to what? is this your superiority complex that grants you the right to decide whether someone is homophobic or not or you received a seal of approval from fox news?
I understand the idea of speaking truth in love. I just don't understand Christian's who use it as to defend harshness, hatefullness and hurtful attitudes. One can speak truth with a loving tone, gestures and genuine concern. Hate and contempt are not traits of love.
As we all can if we do the work. Here is the real way to salvation that Jesus taught.
I agree we all have the ability to hear God through our inner voice. However the Bible clearly seperates Jesus and Moses as the only ones who spoke directly the actual words of God and heard God's voice audibly. All the other prophets in the Bible heard God through dreams, visions and/or the same inner voice that we have access to.
Are we not all sinners?
What of you being truthful about the genocidal son murdering god that you favor?
That would include asking god why he created gays in the first place.
Correct. So why are you placing yourself and other women and gays as second class citizens?
That’s what I said, we are all human and sinners.
What does that even mean?
He didn’t create homosexual’s. God created humans that have free will.
Why are you always talking about women and homosexuals in the same sentence?
Are we not all dirty?
The same disobedience that you sing of Adam’s sin being a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan?
Now you are just stupidly trying to lie to us or are just showing how you do not know your own history.
No to the first as that is not how the word morals is defined.
You cannot be that stupid.
The way you wish love to be expressed is laudable and I wish it would work.
Yes and the gospel explains how to get clean.
Adam had a will, free will doesn't mean freedom from consequences.
I've said the truth and you look triggered.
Define the word morals then.
It doesn't look self evident, Jesus said we would recognize people by their fruits then how is it that you can't show love but only express hatred toward people you don't like?
By your logic, you're homophobic and misogynous since you pretend to apply the gospel better than me or anyone else I guess.
I don’t know if you have seen or read this scholar but you should try to research the older Jewish ideology and recognize that they did not believe in a literal god. They were more like esoteric ecumenists, like Jesus was.
That is true, and should lead you, if you are going to read anything literally, to wonder why there are so many doublets and even triplets in scriptures.
Now you have created a co-creator for god by saying he is not the one creating gays.
If that is what you conclude, be you just stupid, belligerent or obtuse, I have no time or patience for you.
Love is patient. Nuff said.
Have I? I also said that He gave us free will. He created us with free will, doesn’t mean He has anything to do with sin.