Problems with modern medicine

Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
Why are they drinking so much coffee?
5 times a day is a bit excessive.
I love my morning cup, but then I just drink water throughout the day, and if I’m tired I’ll have a cup of PG Tips around 4 pm, but it never keeps me awake at night. I usually fall asleep within 10 minutes after laying down.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
@Etagloc people here drink lots, lots and lots of coffee, it's like our national drink. The brazilian empire flag even had a coffee bean spruce on it.

I believe people like the caffeine high.
Oh, ok.
That makes more sense....still....it doesn’t seem the “high” is very desirable——more like jitters if you drink too much.

Caffeine is highly addictive though. I think people underestimate it.

I think sugar is, too.
The less you eat, the less you want. Raw honey is a good alternative....just sweet enough & no blood sugar spikes.
 

Mr.Anderson

Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
992
The brazilian coffee is different from the US coffee. I'm really tired now so i'm sorry that I can't exactly say why it is different. but our coffee is stronger than in the US.

We even drink it in these cute little cups because they are so strong
1548200424693.png
Sadly I couldn't find the cuter porcelain ones with a hand for size comparison. But that doesn't mean people don't completely ignore this and drink coffee in regular sized cups as well (like me!)
 

Blankface88

Rookie
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
12
Oh, ok.
That makes more sense....still....it doesn’t seem the “high” is very desirable——more like jitters if you drink too much.

Caffeine is highly addictive though. I think people underestimate it.

I think sugar is, too.
The less you eat, the less you want. Raw honey is a good alternative....just sweet enough & no blood sugar spikes.
Honey will give an insulin response and cause a blood sugar spike. It's full of fructose
 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
5,953
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
THC is still demonized after proving its capacity to heal time and time again
Ok, im not trying to debate anyone but i dont know if everyone is aware that george soros is behind the push to legalize it. Its definitely not demonized anymore. However, rather than using at as medicine they appear to be encouraging the recreational use of high thc strains.


Soros successfully used marijuana legalization campaigns to test his ability to reshape American society. It was his first successful venture of making the once unthinkable unacceptable and illegal, a thing of the past, turning Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World‘s “soma” distribution into reality.

George Soros’s first major effort to reshape America was undertaking the legitimization of illegal drug use, especially marijuana. Soros initially said his overarching goal was to promote informed discussion of drug policy. But debate and discussion are not his style and were not his objects. Instead, he used his resources to fund think-tanks, foundations, and public policy action groups that successfully muddled public opinion enough to change public laws, making illegal drug use legal.

Soros’s successful legalization efforts assuaged the social stigma of drug abuse and drove more Americans to regularly use and get addicted to marijuana. Soros claims that marijuana use and addiction will decline once this substance becomes legal, as will the illegal trade in this drug. But this prediction has not panned out.

On the contrary, the number of users and addicts, especially among the young, has grown rapidly in the U.S., Canada, and other countries that have legalized the use of “natural marijuana” as a drug. In the U.S., for example, in 2018, the number of young adults who reported regular use of marijuana rose to 11.8 million, and the number of teens in 8th and 10th grades who say they use it daily has increased as their perception that regular use of marijuana is risky is decreasing. It is decreasing because Soros’s successful legalization campaign has deliberately misled the public on hazards caused by “natural marijuana.”


Portrayed as a grassroots movement, you may not realize that the driving force behind legalization of both medical and recreational marijuana is none other than billionaire George Soros. Along with a cadre of other wealthy donors, Soros has spent at least $80 million in the quest of legalizing cannabis. Through his Foundation to Promote an Open Society, he has funneled donations to the Drug Policy Alliance — a non-profit organization with “the principal goal of ending the American “War on Drugs.”’ He’s also donates annually to the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization which funds marijuana legalization efforts, and gives to the Marijuana Policy Project, which supports state ballot measures.

George Soros appears to be a hero of the cannabis movement — helping states (and even an entire country) pass legislation for medical and recreational use. But he also has strong ties with the pharmaceutical industry and Monsanto as a major stock holder — the same chemical corporation and biotech giant that developed Agent Orange, DDT, PCBs, toxic pesticides, rBGH, Roundup Ready and genetically engineered Frankenfoods. While the widely circulated urban myth that Monsanto is currently developing genetically modified cannabis is false, if you dig a bit deeper, it turns out the corporation quietly conducts research projects on tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) found in marijuana for the apparent purpose of genetically modifying the plant at a future date.



While recent state initiatives to legalize the recreational use of marijuana are often seen as a step in the right direction to make medical cannabis more available to those who need it, these new laws, and along with them new federal regulations, are in fact doing just the opposite in some cases, particularly in Washington State.

State level medical cannabis programs are being deterred and even being shut down by plans to legalize the recreational use of cannabis. In Washington State, a popular vote of the people approved the legalization of marijuana and the creation of a licensed system of growers, processors, and retailers. As originally intended, the new distribution system for recreational marijuana was to coexist with the system for growing and distribution of medical cannabis.

But as it turns out, the medical cannabis system is being folded into the newly approved system for legal marijuana sales. This new structure will have the effect of dismantling what had been an effective medical distribution system for medical cannabis in that state. The medical cannabis program was criticized for its loose regulation, even though the distribution network was working well to serve the needs of patients. Why did the state decide to merge the two systems?

The Seattle Times describes the motivation behind reforming the existing medical marijuana law.

“Lawmakers have worried that the largely unregulated medical system would undercut the taxed recreational industry established by Initiative 502. U.S. Justice Department officials have warned that the state’s medical pot status quo is untenable. … State Senator Ann Rivers has said she’s sympathetic to patients’ concerns, but she’s worried about what the federal government will do if the state doesn’t make the changes.21

The new law will reduce the amount of the drug that patients can possess or grow, eliminate collective gardens (which many dispensaries use), require medical users to register with the state, and mandate that both medical cannabis and recreational marijuana only be sold by the new licensed retailers.

Trusted dispensaries will be closed, they contend, and choices will diminish, with the varieties that marijuana medical users prefer squeezed off the shelves by more profitable recreational varieties grown for their greater, high-producing THC content, not for headache or nausea relief. In Seattle alone, about 200 dispensaries will have to close, replaced by 21 licensed retailers, and under current state regulations, employees in those shops will not be allowed to even discuss the medical value of the products for sale.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
My thoughts on modern/allopathic medicine is that it is mostly harmful or useless for chronic issues if one is not able or willing to make lifestyle changes like eating better, getting some exercise, quitting heavy drinking, that kind of thing.

However, i believe it has its place.

Some people are born with health conditions that require medications like type 1 diabetes. Ive seen people blame other people for their health conditions but not ALL of them are caused by bad personal choices. Then theres the issue of epigenics and the choices that their parents made, which are not their fault.

The other time its useful is emergencies. Before allopathic medicine there was a higher chance of dying from things like stab wounds, gunshot wounds, accidents. I know they didnt have cars back then but trains derailed and people fell off horses, horse drawn carriages crashed, stuff like that.

And heres a big one, childbirth. Before c sections existed if the baby wasnt coming out either the woman died or they had to kill the baby to save her. So i do think they save lives.

And i do think psychology is a total scam. Really trying to overdiagnose children so they can medicate them, so messed up.


Interesting article that says medicine is modern day idolatry, with some child sacrifice mixed in.


Modern day medicine has existed for a relatively short period of human history, and the creation of a body of licensed “physicians” can be traced back to the start of the vaccine movement in Europe in the 1800s, when health officials wanted more control over the population and what they perceived as threatening diseases like smallpox.

Today, medicine is seen as the solution to almost all of life’s problems. A pill or vaccine exists now for just about every ailment or problem in life, and for those problems that don’t have a medical solution yet, billions of dollars are spent on research to find one.

The belief system currently in place is that physical science and medicine can solve all problems in life.

The people who control the medical system are trained and licensed and given great authority to control our lives. Currently they have the authority to take children away from their parents, to declare someone “insane” or mentally disturbed and have them committed to an institution, force people (especially children) to use their products via vaccinations, and make sweeping laws and regulations that affect the lives of everyone.

It is believed that life itself is dependent on medicine, and this belief system is used to justify the authority and power the medical system has in our culture.


So while we may think the idea of child sacrifice in a temple to the “god” Molech was repulsive in ancient culture, are things much different today? Child sacrifice within the field of medicine has simply taken on a new form, and this practice is just now beginning to get mainstream media attention.

One of the most publicized cases in 2014 was the story of Justina Pelletier. Justina was taken away from her parents at the age of 15 by Boston Children’s Hospital, because they disagreed with the family’s physician’s diagnosis of her medical condition. They seized custody of Justina against her will and the will of her parents, and subjected her to a psych ward in an apparent medical experimentation, where she was held for over 16 months.


Psychiatry is presented as a part of medical practice that supposedly has its basis in biological science, but it just simply is not true. There are currently no biological tests that can diagnose mental illness. None. Drugs are prescribed simply on symptoms. It is a $330 billion industry, and the number of antidepressant drugs prescribed has doubled in less than one decade.

Most people don’t realize that the diseases these drugs are supposed to treat are diseases that psychiatrists vote on to include in their “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders” (DSM)3.

There are no objective tests to detect these “diseases,” and the number of defined diseases that go into the DSM are increasing at an alarming rate, and now include such things that in the past were considered within the realm of normal behavior.

One of the largest and most controversial ones is “attention deficit disorder” which is increasingly being used to prescribe strong drugs for children that are “overactive” and have “behavior problems.”

Even unhappiness is now considered a disease, and drugs can be prescribed for that too. Critics point out that the DSM is so large now, that it can now cover the behavior patterns of the entire human population, and effectively label everyone now as having a mental illness.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,725
Ok, im not trying to debate anyone but i dont know if everyone is aware that george soros is behind the push to legalize it. Its definitely not demonized anymore. However, rather than using at as medicine they appear to be encouraging the recreational use of high thc strains.


Soros successfully used marijuana legalization campaigns to test his ability to reshape American society. It was his first successful venture of making the once unthinkable unacceptable and illegal, a thing of the past, turning Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World‘s “soma” distribution into reality.

George Soros’s first major effort to reshape America was undertaking the legitimization of illegal drug use, especially marijuana. Soros initially said his overarching goal was to promote informed discussion of drug policy. But debate and discussion are not his style and were not his objects. Instead, he used his resources to fund think-tanks, foundations, and public policy action groups that successfully muddled public opinion enough to change public laws, making illegal drug use legal.

Soros’s successful legalization efforts assuaged the social stigma of drug abuse and drove more Americans to regularly use and get addicted to marijuana. Soros claims that marijuana use and addiction will decline once this substance becomes legal, as will the illegal trade in this drug. But this prediction has not panned out.

On the contrary, the number of users and addicts, especially among the young, has grown rapidly in the U.S., Canada, and other countries that have legalized the use of “natural marijuana” as a drug. In the U.S., for example, in 2018, the number of young adults who reported regular use of marijuana rose to 11.8 million, and the number of teens in 8th and 10th grades who say they use it daily has increased as their perception that regular use of marijuana is risky is decreasing. It is decreasing because Soros’s successful legalization campaign has deliberately misled the public on hazards caused by “natural marijuana.”


Portrayed as a grassroots movement, you may not realize that the driving force behind legalization of both medical and recreational marijuana is none other than billionaire George Soros. Along with a cadre of other wealthy donors, Soros has spent at least $80 million in the quest of legalizing cannabis. Through his Foundation to Promote an Open Society, he has funneled donations to the Drug Policy Alliance — a non-profit organization with “the principal goal of ending the American “War on Drugs.”’ He’s also donates annually to the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization which funds marijuana legalization efforts, and gives to the Marijuana Policy Project, which supports state ballot measures.

George Soros appears to be a hero of the cannabis movement — helping states (and even an entire country) pass legislation for medical and recreational use. But he also has strong ties with the pharmaceutical industry and Monsanto as a major stock holder — the same chemical corporation and biotech giant that developed Agent Orange, DDT, PCBs, toxic pesticides, rBGH, Roundup Ready and genetically engineered Frankenfoods. While the widely circulated urban myth that Monsanto is currently developing genetically modified cannabis is false, if you dig a bit deeper, it turns out the corporation quietly conducts research projects on tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) found in marijuana for the apparent purpose of genetically modifying the plant at a future date.



While recent state initiatives to legalize the recreational use of marijuana are often seen as a step in the right direction to make medical cannabis more available to those who need it, these new laws, and along with them new federal regulations, are in fact doing just the opposite in some cases, particularly in Washington State.

State level medical cannabis programs are being deterred and even being shut down by plans to legalize the recreational use of cannabis. In Washington State, a popular vote of the people approved the legalization of marijuana and the creation of a licensed system of growers, processors, and retailers. As originally intended, the new distribution system for recreational marijuana was to coexist with the system for growing and distribution of medical cannabis.

But as it turns out, the medical cannabis system is being folded into the newly approved system for legal marijuana sales. This new structure will have the effect of dismantling what had been an effective medical distribution system for medical cannabis in that state. The medical cannabis program was criticized for its loose regulation, even though the distribution network was working well to serve the needs of patients. Why did the state decide to merge the two systems?

The Seattle Times describes the motivation behind reforming the existing medical marijuana law.

“Lawmakers have worried that the largely unregulated medical system would undercut the taxed recreational industry established by Initiative 502. U.S. Justice Department officials have warned that the state’s medical pot status quo is untenable. … State Senator Ann Rivers has said she’s sympathetic to patients’ concerns, but she’s worried about what the federal government will do if the state doesn’t make the changes.21

The new law will reduce the amount of the drug that patients can possess or grow, eliminate collective gardens (which many dispensaries use), require medical users to register with the state, and mandate that both medical cannabis and recreational marijuana only be sold by the new licensed retailers.

Trusted dispensaries will be closed, they contend, and choices will diminish, with the varieties that marijuana medical users prefer squeezed off the shelves by more profitable recreational varieties grown for their greater, high-producing THC content, not for headache or nausea relief. In Seattle alone, about 200 dispensaries will have to close, replaced by 21 licensed retailers, and under current state regulations, employees in those shops will not be allowed to even discuss the medical value of the products for sale.
As a disclaimer, it should be stated that drugs, alcohol and hallucinogens, etc. entice people to escape our present reality for brief periods of time. And while that may be very tempting given the Orwellian state of the world that is growing darker by the day if not by the hour, we all have no other option than to face the reality that we've created, and work to make this a better world.

However, at the end of the day, marijuana is a plant. Why should any government -- which was created by people to be their servant -- be in a position to "regulate" ANY plants? Again, this is NOT meant to encourage anyone to smoke dope or get high, because there isn't any time for anyone right now not to have their wits about them 60x60x24x7x52.

Is it not obvious that the corporate fictional governments of this world, particularly the United States government corporation (the current president of which is allegedly Joe Biden), are the enforcement muscle for the world's largest drug dealers?

#1 drug dealer in the world: Elizabeth A.M. Battenburg, aka as Elizabeth Mountbatten, and by her criminal aliases "QE2" and "House of Windsor". When the Taliban cut off Elizabeth's opium production in 2001, she sent the U.S. troops into Afghanistan to restore production and guard her poppy fields.

OpiumProduction-Tal-US-UK.png

#2 drug dealer in the world: the Cocaine Importers of America, aka the CIA.

1660992533883.png

It should be self-evident that the ONLY reason a corporate fictional government would want to "legalize" marijuana is so they can control it and tax it.

Recognizing this fact will take the guesswork out of why front-men like Soros are involved, or what is really going on behind the scenes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
1,837
Won't touch a pill, if I can help it.
It's understandable more if there is no other choice, like having a debilitating illness or disorder where you're in a lot of pain and there's no other way out.
But, it's sad how many chemicals there are in pharmaceuticals. I always look for the natural cure or treatment first, before I would have to unfortunately resort to pharma
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
1,837
should be self-evident that the ONLY reason a corporate fictional government would want to "legalize" marijuana is so they can control it and tax it.
This. Or course this is something they would do with something that's supposed to be natural.
Have to admit, I do smoke pot, myself. But as a treatment, more so. The fact that it was George Soros' idea to legalize it is absolutely horrifying..I was thinking there has to be agenda somewhere, and here it is!
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
I saw this video about a little 5 yr old girl that died, the cause of death was myocarditis from flu complications, so the first thing i thought was v@x side effects. Its a MSM video, so they never mentioned that possibility of course.

The main focus was on how inefficient the hospital was, she was there for over a day before they diagnosed what was wrong with her.


Since this is a conspiracy site, im gonna give my theory. I think tptb are on purpose allowing criticism of hospitals to turn people's public opinion against them, sort of what they were doing with the police a couple years ago. That way they can bring in whatever horrible "solution" they have. Robot police dogs replacing police and some kind of transhumanism nanotechnology stuff for human health.

I always just remember, if it's allowed to be criticized on MSM that means tptb okayed it.

Coincidentally, the WEF is recommending brain microchip implants to transition from health care to "well care".


Brain implants will provide health benefits “equivalent of a dog’s nose” in a gadget “that can be handy to sniff out COVID-19,” the WEF agenda contributor assures. But unlike phones that “might feel like part of your body,” the augmentation technology “will become more intertwined with the body in the form of implants.”

Technology has always had the potential to transform society and improve our daily and professional lives. So does augmentation technology,” the WEF article concludes. “It goes hand in hand with an evolution from health care to ‘well care’, where it’s not just about solving an impairment anymore. It’s about technology that supports you and improves your overall quality of life.”
 

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
5,953
only reason they created modern
"medicine"speaking sennicav/pills
not life saving closure of wounds
and emergency C section

speaking only on all the medications
that have been derived from a plant/animal
tptb have created any of their poisons
thats treats anything they decide to make
up for it to treat

that's why they have to synthesize everything
from it as in its Natural form used by anyone
then We'd have no need of the pharmaceuticals
the way We rely on them now would We

they do it claiming ownership of something that
is meant to be for everyone,now they get to get
the poisons the only thing We're allowed to use
if We try using some Naturals it'll get Us in a cell

it's because they Know like always if We started
using the straight Naturals the way they are
meant to be used,as they've always been used
and are still being used in some places

tptb designed diseases leave and so does the
need of their poisons

video says it all

 

Simka

Established
Joined
Jul 31, 2018
Messages
103
I think our main problem is that we are too lazy. Everyone wants to buy a magic pill that can solve all health issues. Though almost everyone understands that health problems are caused mostly by unhealthy lifestyles, bad/wrong nutrition, lack of exercise, etc. The pharmaceutical business is one of the biggest in the world. Meds are sold everywhere and they are promoted the way we want to buy them. Of course, there are cases when people need medications and it is great that such pills exist (a lot of like joking about people who buy viagra online, but this medication is also helpful in the treatment of ED), but still, we won't require so many meds if we took more care of our health.
 
Last edited:

free2018

Star
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,453
I saw this video about a little 5 yr old girl that died, the cause of death was myocarditis from flu complications, so the first thing i thought was v@x side effects. Its a MSM video, so they never mentioned that possibility of course.

The main focus was on how inefficient the hospital was, she was there for over a day before they diagnosed what was wrong with her.


Since this is a conspiracy site, im gonna give my theory. I think tptb are on purpose allowing criticism of hospitals to turn people's public opinion against them, sort of what they were doing with the police a couple years ago. That way they can bring in whatever horrible "solution" they have. Robot police dogs replacing police and some kind of transhumanism nanotechnology stuff for human health.

I always just remember, if it's allowed to be criticized on MSM that means tptb okayed it.

Coincidentally, the WEF is recommending brain microchip implants to transition from health care to "well care".


Brain implants will provide health benefits “equivalent of a dog’s nose” in a gadget “that can be handy to sniff out COVID-19,” the WEF agenda contributor assures. But unlike phones that “might feel like part of your body,” the augmentation technology “will become more intertwined with the body in the form of implants.”

Technology has always had the potential to transform society and improve our daily and professional lives. So does augmentation technology,” the WEF article concludes. “It goes hand in hand with an evolution from health care to ‘well care’, where it’s not just about solving an impairment anymore. It’s about technology that supports you and improves your overall quality of life.”
I hear you but medicine is represented by the serpent on purpose.

Doctors gave away the vaccine to humans without any thought about why the common cold requires three or four shots. And once again, the corona virus has never been isolated.

Do we need to use doctors? Of course, but need to use wisdom, discernment and prayer.

Cops? Do we need cops? I won’t address this at all on this thread.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
I hear you but medicine is represented by the serpent on purpose.
I've heard some say that it can also represent the serpent Moses made in Numbers 21 to keep those who had been bitten from dying.
(I'm not pro big pharma here, just saying something I've read)

Doctors gave away the vaccine to humans without any thought about why the common cold requires three or four shots. And once again, the corona virus has never been isolated.
And im strongly anti v@x, not just corona either.

Do we need to use doctors? Of course, but need to use wisdom, discernment and prayer
This one is very hard for me to come to terms with. For years i was one of the most anti-allopath anti big pharma people imaginable. It has been devastatingly humbling to have to realize that if it wasn't for them my kids and i would be dead.
I cannot even begin to describe the inner conflict and cognitive dissonance i have regarding this because of that fact. I would love to just be able to say that ALL allopathic treatments are evil and leave it at that, but im grateful my children and i are alive.
 

free2018

Star
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,453
I've heard some say that it can also represent the serpent Moses made in Numbers 21 to keep those who had been bitten from dying.
(I'm not pro big pharma here, just saying something I've read)


And im strongly anti v@x, not just corona either.


This one is very hard for me to come to terms with. For years i was one of the most anti-allopath anti big pharma people imaginable. It has been devastatingly humbling to have to realize that if it wasn't for them my kids and i would be dead.
I cannot even begin to describe the inner conflict and cognitive dissonance i have regarding this because of that fact. I would love to just be able to say that ALL allopathic treatments are evil and leave it at that, but im grateful my children and i are alive.
Great word— allopathic. Love to learn new words.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Read this article that reminded me of this

Since this is a conspiracy site, im gonna give my theory. I think tptb are on purpose allowing criticism of hospitals to turn people's public opinion against them

Some speculate that the human economy is already being phased out as obsolete while the AI robot economy slips in to take its place. Google remains at the forefront of this transition, which is also being fueled by growing skepticism about the quality and legitimacy of today’s medical professionals.
The technology is not fully there yet, but it is moving rapidly in the direction of artificial intelligence (AI) robots one day being able to replace all human doctors and completely take over medicine.

Towards this end, researchers looked at Google’s AI chatbot, which they asked a series of common medical questions. They found that the program answered 92.6 percent of questions correctly, this compared to a 92.9 percent accuracy rate among actual doctors.

“Doctors also rated the likelihood and extent of the harm that came from giving the wrong answers,” tweeted Prof. Ethan Mollick from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania about a new study about the subject that was published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“The percentage of harmful advice from the trained chatbot (Med-PaLM) was essentially rated the same as the percentage of potentially harmful advice provided by other real doctors!”

Some speculate that the human economy is already being phased out as obsolete while the AI robot economy slips in to take its place. Google remains at the forefront of this transition, which is also being fueled by growing skepticism about the quality and legitimacy of today’s medical professionals.

“This paper shows that doctors vastly overestimate the odds of disease before testing, and continue to do so after both positive & negative test results,” Mollick explained in another tweet.

“It held for all diseases studied, from cancer to UTIs to pneumonia. More stats, training, stat!”

On the flip side, there is growing awareness and distrust in AI, which if it ever truly becomes sentiment would almost certainly be used to exterminate human beings and create a global system of tyranny.

You may recall that back in 2019, the head of Google DeepMind and AI was fired for spying and eavesdropping on thousands of users. This person used Google’s AI systems to illegally record people’s voices without their knowledge or permission.

Even so, some are pushing to expand AI intrusion into everyday life. Concerning AI medicine robots, someone responding to Mollick’s Twitter thread wrote that eventually the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will probably approve the technology as a medical device and even use it to prescribe drugs to patients.

“Just wait until your toothbrush sequences your DNA for nearly free,” wrote another. “Mutations will immediately be detected. Also, this is why we need to establish secure data property rights.”
Corrupt and ineffective allopath system being replaced by AI that can be programmed (or become sentient and make the choice) to kill humans who are not up to "standards", what could possibly go wrong?
 

Mr.Anderson

Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
992
Corrupt and ineffective allopath system being replaced by AI that can be programmed (or become sentient and make the choice) to kill humans who are not up to "standards", what could possibly go wrong?
Whenever I read about AI doctors I think to myself how will the AI be trained to begin with. Today doctors are already terrible because they're speed freaks. Also, even if you DIDN'T teach the AI to kill people, it would eventually do it because people are dumb and they're prone to lie when you ask their simptons.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Whenever I read about AI doctors I think to myself how will the AI be trained to begin with. Today doctors are already terrible because they're speed freaks. Also, even if you DIDN'T teach the AI to kill people, it would eventually do it because people are dumb and they're prone to lie when you ask their simptons.
Eh, most doctors I've come across don't BELIEVE people when they give their symptoms. These doctors think they know everything and won't believe what the patients have to say because of course we're not as smart and all-knowing as them, even tho we're the ones living in our body and with our symptoms.

Insurance companies dictating which treatments can be legally used, or in what order, doesn't help the matter.

Not sure if by speed freaks you mean they want to get through as many patients as possibly (true) or if you mean they're on speed (possibly true).
 

Mr.Anderson

Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Messages
992
@ToxicFemininitySucks

Speed, the drug!

Not believing goes both ways. The doctors don't believe and the people lie. It's not as they aaactually try to lie, but in these 8 years i've been working in the health field i've noticed that people tend to hide or don't give vital information until asked, and doctors don't ask this info. Just simple stuff like "hey, are you diabetic?" before prescribing steroids, for example.
 
Top