Aero
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 5,910
VAERS? The same people who wrote this on their website.Nope I have to argue with you on this 2 points:
Too early for mortality data? Not at all and the link I provided with an analysis of only VAERS shows a clear signal between vaccines and death.
"Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
- Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
- Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
- The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
- VAERS data is limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
- VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information."
I didn't say "asymptomatic". What I meant was people had symptoms but must not have felt that poorly. They had a cough, but probably cough all the time anyway, so they thought nothing of it.2nd - “Relatively healthy people ended up being carriers because they weren't vaccinated.”
This has been disproven time and again. The “asymptomatic carrier” is a myth. You say relatively healthy but I don’t exactly know what you mean by that. But even Fauci admitted that “asymptomatic carriers have never been the driver of a pandemic.”
The WHO redefined a “pandemic” btw, I believe right before or during the first SARS outbreak to no longer be about DEATHS but simply Cases - which is critical. Why? Because they are in the business of monetizing disease. That’s it. If pandemic meant what it used to mean, because of the low mortality rate of Covid we couldn’t even be IN a pandemic and they could never roll out their “emergency measures” and we then couldn’t have EUA vaccines.
I mostly agree with what you are saying about monetizing disease, though. But I don't think we should fight a myth with a myth. In other words, the vax isn't dropping people left and right. Except on the internet where you read about it.
You have a point. I'm not trying to make arguments for the people who want us all in chains. I still don't think the vaccine is the smoking gun. Maybe it's better to say the vax is a small piece of the puzzle.So it all ties back.
And this constant shifting of definitions and goal posts should make anyone question motives.
Redefining “pandemic.”
The redefining of a “case” to only mean a positive PCR test
The redefining of “herd immunity” to only mean the vaccinated.
Rather convenient, no?