peridot
Established
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2018
- Messages
- 255
The premise of this is interesting but erroneous. If the "south" was serious about not "race mixing," they should have left those "different raced" people back in the countries they took them from, and never had so many babies with them. Cruelty is always short sighted and never ends well.
But it is interesting that the title says "marriages" not babies, although it is clearly the offspring that everyone else is discussing. It sounds like the real problem the OP wants to discuss may be more about a change from torture where mixing was clearly and rapidly done, to something "more acceptable."
Now for all those talking about the lost of culture, that's not the problem of the marriage -- that's a problem of the people. You can not lose what you really want to keep. Any culture lost is specifically because people who have that culture have, either voluntarily or under duress, decided not to practice it anymore, or to share it with others. How often have we seen and heard popular culture spin tales of first or second generation immigrants as children who desperately wanted to fit into the new culture where they currently lived? It wasn't their marriages to the other first and second graders that made them smuggle clothes to school and change, or throw their "ethnic" lunches in the trash before their classmates could see them, or cringe and hide in a back room when their parents spoke their native tongue. But it definitely may have had a lot more to do with that current culture's tendency to denigrate anything different from itself (and the fact that most kids attempt to reject their home identities at some point during their development for something "more exciting").
Also, especially nowaday, people seem a lot more interested in learning about cultures different themselves. They will try food from different places, take classes to learn the history and art, spend money to visit these places, etc. If the culture is there, I guarantee someone will eventually be interested in it, even if not the people from whom it originally sprang.
But it is interesting that the title says "marriages" not babies, although it is clearly the offspring that everyone else is discussing. It sounds like the real problem the OP wants to discuss may be more about a change from torture where mixing was clearly and rapidly done, to something "more acceptable."
Now for all those talking about the lost of culture, that's not the problem of the marriage -- that's a problem of the people. You can not lose what you really want to keep. Any culture lost is specifically because people who have that culture have, either voluntarily or under duress, decided not to practice it anymore, or to share it with others. How often have we seen and heard popular culture spin tales of first or second generation immigrants as children who desperately wanted to fit into the new culture where they currently lived? It wasn't their marriages to the other first and second graders that made them smuggle clothes to school and change, or throw their "ethnic" lunches in the trash before their classmates could see them, or cringe and hide in a back room when their parents spoke their native tongue. But it definitely may have had a lot more to do with that current culture's tendency to denigrate anything different from itself (and the fact that most kids attempt to reject their home identities at some point during their development for something "more exciting").
Also, especially nowaday, people seem a lot more interested in learning about cultures different themselves. They will try food from different places, take classes to learn the history and art, spend money to visit these places, etc. If the culture is there, I guarantee someone will eventually be interested in it, even if not the people from whom it originally sprang.