Medical Website Indulges Trans Community With New Term For Female Genitalia

[Thunderian]

Save us, Lord.

Medical Website Indulges Trans Community With New Term For Female Genitalia​

dailywire.com/news/34778/medical-website-indulges-trans-community-new-term-hank-berrien​

​

A health information site titled Healthline, which serves a reputed 85 million people a month, is offering an “LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide” that stipulates the word “vagina” is no longer appropriate for that part of the female genitalia. Instead, the proper term for that orifice is . . . “front hole.”​

​

But why, you may ask? Why is a term that has been used for ages suddenly jettisoned in favor of the term “front hole?” The LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide writes:​

​

​

For the purposes of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the “front hole” instead of solely using the medical term “vagina.” This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.​

As Jonathon Van Maren writes at Lifesite News:​

​

​

Women who claim they are men, but are still anatomically female, feel that accurately labeling their genitals is problematic because they “don’t identify” with the medically correct terms. In other words, they accurately fear that if someone knows they have a “vagina,” those people will assume (quite safely) that they are female, when they have decided that they are not.​

The term “front hole” has been bandied about for a while; last January Bustle quoted “sex educator” Kenna Cook pontificating, "Language for sex that is coded in anatomy is meant to reinforce a heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex … The terms people use for their sexual body parts are a large contributor to them feeling comfortable engaging in certain sex acts. Some trans men don't refer to their genitals with female-coded language, opting for 'boy hole' or 'front hole.'”​

​

Anyone who promulgates that heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex should just shut their piehole.​

​

Or else they’re just a rectum, or whatever you call it.​

 

[Lurker]

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

 

[Etagloc]

Either you Christians are going to get rid of secularism or us Muslims need to get rid of secularism (by peaceful means- I'm not advocating violence- but secularism has to go).

The whole concept of "separation of church and state" has been an interesting experiment but we can officially state that the experiment has failed. The experiment should not be allowed to continue. Once you try to take out God, there is no basis for morality- or even sanity. Cut off the head and the body will fall. Secularism is the head of this. Cut off the head and the body will fall. The lunatics who want to re-engineer humans are on the offensive. The sane people need to go on the offensive and restore sanity. God is not optional. Humans need God. Either secularism goes or civilization goes. I'm not prepared to sacrifice humanity for some man-made "Enlightenment" ideas I never cared about or agreed to.

Secularism is what leaves the door wide open for this. I want that door shut. I don't want to know what else is going to go through that door.

 

[Thunderian]

No, thank you.

I'm not prepared to live under a system where God is the de facto head of state, unless God is actually the one calling the shots. Until Jesus Christ sits on his throne, the best societies we can come up with are secular ones, where people are free to believe and say what they want, no matter how stupid.

 

[polymoog]

Either you Christians are going to get rid of secularism or us Muslims need to get rid of secularism (by peaceful means- I'm not advocating violence- but secularism has to go).

The whole concept of "separation of church and state" has been an interesting experiment but we can officially state that the experiment has failed. The experiment should not be allowed to continue. Once you try to take out God, there is no basis for morality- or even sanity. Cut off the head and the body will fall. Secularism is the head of this. Cut off the head and the body will fall. The lunatics who want to re-engineer humans are on the offensive. The sane people need to go on the offensive and restore sanity. God is not optional. Humans need God. Either secularism goes or civilization goes. I'm not prepared to sacrifice humanity for some man-made "Enlightenment" ideas I never cared about or agreed to.

Secularism is what leaves the door wide open for this. I want that door shut. I don't want to know what else is going to go through that door.

cant you see that if the church or the muslim leadership was running the show under sharia law that the same stuff would be pushed on us? the religions would slowly turn to become a religious police state, which is even worse than what we have here. to "unite" the people under any religion, islam or christianity would be twisted and bent-- "modified" to be "inclusive". from there, we would have everything we have now with the addition of insulting god if you break the law. that could lead to death. thoughts of the inquisition and trials of heresy from hundreds of years ago come to my mind. of course the top leadership in ANY religion would be coerced to do the bidding of the elites/NWO. the leaders would decide and interpret the religious laws for us and we would be at their whim as we could not question them.
its another layer of oppression. we have enough of that already.

 

[elsbet]

Save us, Lord.

Medical Website Indulges Trans Community With New Term For Female Genitalia​

dailywire.com/news/34778/medical-website-indulges-trans-community-new-term-hank-berrien​

​

A health information site titled Healthline, which serves a reputed 85 million people a month, is offering an “LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide” that stipulates the word “vagina” is no longer appropriate for that part of the female genitalia. Instead, the proper term for that orifice is . . . “front hole.”​

​

But why, you may ask? Why is a term that has been used for ages suddenly jettisoned in favor of the term “front hole?” The LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide writes:​

​

​

For the purposes of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the “front hole” instead of solely using the medical term “vagina.” This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.​

As Jonathon Van Maren writes at Lifesite News:​

​

​

Women who claim they are men, but are still anatomically female, feel that accurately labeling their genitals is problematic because they “don’t identify” with the medically correct terms. In other words, they accurately fear that if someone knows they have a “vagina,” those people will assume (quite safely) that they are female, when they have decided that they are not.​

The term “front hole” has been bandied about for a while; last January Bustle quoted “sex educator” Kenna Cook pontificating, "Language for sex that is coded in anatomy is meant to reinforce a heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex … The terms people use for their sexual body parts are a large contributor to them feeling comfortable engaging in certain sex acts. Some trans men don't refer to their genitals with female-coded language, opting for 'boy hole' or 'front hole.'”​

​

Anyone who promulgates that heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex should just shut their piehole.​

​

Or else they’re just a rectum, or whatever you call it.​

I don't care, and I refuse to participate.

I think euphemisms would be more appropriate, or at least preferable, at this point. -.-

 

[Thunderian]

cant you see that if the church or the muslim leadership was running the show under sharia law that the same stuff would be pushed on us? the religions would slowly turn to become a religious police state, which is even worse than what we have here. to "unite" the people under any religion, islam or christianity would be twisted and bent-- "modified" to be "inclusive". from there, we would have everything we have now with the addition of insulting god if you break the law. that could lead to death. thoughts of the inquisition and trials of heresy from hundreds of years ago come to my mind. of course the top leadership in ANY religion would be coerced to do the bidding of the elites/NWO. the leaders would decide and interpret the religious laws for us and we would be at their whim as we could not question them.
its another layer of oppression. we have enough of that already.

This is why we don't want to live in a theocracy.

Indonesia: Woman who complained over noise caused by mosque convicted of blasphemy and sentenced to 18 months in jail

 

[elsbet]

This is why we don't want to live in a theocracy.

Indonesia: Woman who complained over noise caused by mosque convicted of blasphemy and sentenced to 18 months in jail

"Overrun" comes to mind.

 

[Etagloc]

No, thank you.

I'm not prepared to live under a system where God is the de facto head of state, unless God is actually the one calling the shots. Until Jesus Christ sits on his throne, the best societies we can come up with are secular ones, where people are free to believe and say what they want, no matter how stupid.

If you want to insist on the status quo, it is what it is

it has been shown that trying to take God out of the public sphere is a basis for disaster

I'm not saying God being the supposed head of state or a state religion being forced on anyone

but that the state should and must rule in accordance with the natural law

 

[Etagloc]

if we refuse to accept the only sane solution

which is a society which is in line with natural law

then we can be upset about the logical consequences of what we support

but we are not willing to do anything about it... and we ourselves are reinforcing the move towards Sodom and Gomorrah

it's not like we either live in a Godless society based on do-whatever-you-want and increasingly resembling Sodom and Gomorrah or we live in a totalitarian dystopia where everyone is forced to convert to a state religion

if pornography is banned, if religious values are promoted, (just to give examples) I am sure the earth will continue to spin

 

[Thunderian]

if pornography is banned, if religious values are promoted, (just to give examples) I am sure the earth will continue to spin

Whose religion, though? Whose idea of God? Yours or mine?

As an example, Islam forbids alcohol. Christianity does not. For the sake of "religious values", which one of us will give up part of our faith?

 

[Etagloc]

what I don't get is.... if you really believe in God and in the Quran or the Bible

why on earth would you want to help make sure that society continues moving in the direction of Sodom and Gomorrah and make sure that we only complain about it and never follow any of the logical steps to save the society

none of the Prophets (PBUT) that I'm aware of said "oh my people! Ye have sinned! Water down your religion and make sure it doesn't offend people! Passively sit back and refuse to do anything as your society goes down the drain"

Westerners are clearly willing to commit civilizational suicide for the sake of shallow pleasures.... are these other cultures taking that approach? no these other cultures are striving and sacrificing and on the rise.... the West has no right to complain... if they don't care about their civilization having a future.... if that is the case, then perhaps it is the will of Almighty God that other, more deserving, more vigorous civilizations will rise while Western civilization falls.... if Western civilization insists on growing more and more degenerate.... then I am confident that God will bring justice.... there is no right in spreading moral disease.... I am trying to help people but you can't help people who refuse to help themselves.... I don't think there's any sense in talking religion and not living it... I think Western society is intent on challenging God... if other people want to promote society going in the direction of Sodom and Gomorrah.... okay, fine.... but I am not responsible for society.... all I want is to be able to say when I stand before my Creator that when I saw society moving further and further in that direction- that I was against it.... Allah is my judge

 

[manama]

My God, this is not a religious issue, not everything is related to spiritual beliefs. Its just a bunch of dumb people being dumb.

 

[Etagloc]

My God, this is not a religious issue, not everything is related to spiritual beliefs. Its just a bunch of dumb people being dumb.

Is the human body a spiritual issue?

 

[Thunderian]

what I don't get is.... if you really believe in God and in the Quran or the Bible

why on earth would you want to help make sure that society continues moving in the direction of Sodom and Gomorrah and make sure that we only complain about it and never follow any of the logical steps to save the society

none of the Prophets (PBUT) that I'm aware of said "oh my people! Ye have sinned! Water down your religion and make sure it doesn't offend people! Passively sit back and refuse to do anything as your society goes down the drain"

Westerners are clearly willing to commit civilizational suicide for the sake of shallow pleasures.... are these other cultures taking that approach? no these other cultures are striving and sacrificing and on the rise.... the West has no right to complain... if they don't care about their civilization having a future.... if that is the case, then perhaps it is the will of Almighty God that other, more deserving, more vigorous civilizations will rise while Western civilization falls.... if Western civilization insists on growing more and more degenerate.... then I am confident that God will bring justice.... there is no right in spreading moral disease.... I am trying to help people but you can't help people who refuse to help themselves.... I don't think there's any sense in talking religion and not living it... I think Western society is intent on challenging God... if other people want to promote society going in the direction of Sodom and Gomorrah.... okay, fine.... but I am not responsible for society.... all I want is to be able to say when I stand before my Creator that when I saw society moving further and further in that direction- that I was against it.... Allah is my judge

You didn't answer my question. If society's laws are to be based on religion, whose religion will they be based on? Yours or mine.

The Bible doesn't tell us to change the world into a perfect place. The Bible tells us that the world is fallen and cursed, and that humans are evil. That alone should stop anyone with brains from wanting to live under a religious legal system.

I've had enough bad experiences living under religious institutions that an entire country based on religion sounds like hell to me.

 

[Etagloc]

I mean- are we just pieces of meat? The question is inherently spiritual.

 

[sim hae]

cant you see that if the church or the muslim leadership was running the show under sharia law that the same stuff would be pushed on us? the religions would slowly turn to become a religious police state, which is even worse than what we have here. to "unite" the people under any religion, islam or christianity would be twisted and bent-- "modified" to be "inclusive". from there, we would have everything we have now with the addition of insulting god if you break the law. that could lead to death. thoughts of the inquisition and trials of heresy from hundreds of years ago come to my mind. of course the top leadership in ANY religion would be coerced to do the bidding of the elites/NWO. the leaders would decide and interpret the religious laws for us and we would be at their whim as we could not question them.
its another layer of oppression. we have enough of that already.

When my part of the world was under Ottoman rule, longitudinal impalement was the go to punishment for breaking any of their "perfect" religious laws or even looking at the "holy people" funny. Blessed times indeed

 

[Bacsi]

Save us, Lord.

Medical Website Indulges Trans Community With New Term For Female Genitalia​

dailywire.com/news/34778/medical-website-indulges-trans-community-new-term-hank-berrien​

​

A health information site titled Healthline, which serves a reputed 85 million people a month, is offering an “LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide” that stipulates the word “vagina” is no longer appropriate for that part of the female genitalia. Instead, the proper term for that orifice is . . . “front hole.”​

​

But why, you may ask? Why is a term that has been used for ages suddenly jettisoned in favor of the term “front hole?” The LGBTQIA Safe Sex Guide writes:​

​

​

For the purposes of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the “front hole” instead of solely using the medical term “vagina.” This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.​

As Jonathon Van Maren writes at Lifesite News:​

​

​

Women who claim they are men, but are still anatomically female, feel that accurately labeling their genitals is problematic because they “don’t identify” with the medically correct terms. In other words, they accurately fear that if someone knows they have a “vagina,” those people will assume (quite safely) that they are female, when they have decided that they are not.​

The term “front hole” has been bandied about for a while; last January Bustle quoted “sex educator” Kenna Cook pontificating, "Language for sex that is coded in anatomy is meant to reinforce a heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex … The terms people use for their sexual body parts are a large contributor to them feeling comfortable engaging in certain sex acts. Some trans men don't refer to their genitals with female-coded language, opting for 'boy hole' or 'front hole.'”​

​

Anyone who promulgates that heteronormative, reproductive-based idea of sex should just shut their piehole.​

​

Or else they’re just a rectum, or whatever you call it.​

Doesn't really matter what you call it. It's only consequences. The reason for this desire to change common words is rebellion against the true God and the truth of this Universe

 

[Etagloc]

You didn't answer my question. If society's laws are to be based on religion, whose religion will they be based on? Yours or mine.

I did answer that question. I have clearly stated that it should reflect natural law.

I've had enough bad experiences living under religious institutions that an entire country based on religion sounds like hell to me.

I described a country which is in accord with natural law. To go against natural law is insane. Any sane person should be able to agree on natural law.

 

[Etagloc]

This is why we don't want to live in a theocracy.

Indonesia: Woman who complained over noise caused by mosque convicted of blasphemy and sentenced to 18 months in jail

It's better than her shooting up her high school.

Islam forbids alcohol. Christianity does not. For the sake of "religious values", which one of us will give up part of our faith?

Eh. I don't think the issue is that serious. I'm not for alcohol. But if alcohol gets served, I don't think that in itself will destroy the society- although I don't like it. If alcohol doesn't get served- I think people will survive.

If this and the Indonesian woman are the horrors of religion in the public sphere.... sounds pretty good to me.

I'm more worried about big issues- like the destruction of the family structure.

sharia law

I have specified that society should be in line with natural law.