From what I see, most material on this subject (“why men are no longer men”) examines it solely through social-cultural lens OR the environmental/hormonal lens. The articles I posted ofcourse fall in the former category and yet both factors combine to wrought changes that we are seeing in the male demographic. For example, we could imagine that testosterone levels in men are at pre-Industrial Revolution levels, how helpful would that be if there was mass, prolonged unemployment that affects sectors dominated by men? Because every time that happens, suicide in males skyrockets and suicide is often seen as a sign of weakness. I could try other examples but the point being “chemical castration” isn’t the one & only cause of the problem.
I've yet to be convinced that "men no longer being men" is a real problem, though.
People have been seduced by the "image" of a man. I might go so far as to say that image is a stereotype. Now, I really don't feel like looking up suicide statistics, but I think it's common sense that stereotypes cause real damage to the psyche.
I'm a little tired so hopefully, this makes sense. If men feel weak for whatever reason, and want to kill themselves, the answer isn't having them watch cowboy movies or jacking up their testosterone. The answer is men accepting their weakness and not being ashamed of it. In other words, no amount of testosterone will take away a man's inherent weaknesses.
Men and women both need to reject those stereotypes and come to terms with each other as whole things.
@Maes17 said he got married young so I would be interested in his perspective or in corroborating that man’s opinion. True, marrying at 18-22 sounds crazy and iam pretty sure that the statistics for that age group are on the low-end and as we go forward into this decade and beyond, will further diminish. Nevertheless I think that divorce isn’t a respecter of age groups. Saying I will get married when iam 30+ and because iam older with a little bit of life experience……that won’t insulate you from divorce.
I agree, but I wasn't the one generalizing.
There's no perfect age to get married. The real issue is one that's been with humanity forever. Finding the right person to marry, or even date has always been a challenge. More importantly, relationships aren't like playing the lottery. We need to stop thinking like that.
If you want to find the right mate, it's called put in the WORK. It's like, if there are no good men in your city, get off your ass and go somewhere else. Work on yourself, and work on pursuing the opposite sex the right way.
That has been attributed to Empty Nest syndrome or “We are staying married till the kids leave” mantra.
Considering how many, and how much longer children are living with their parents, what you wrote makes sense.
I just thought i was hypocritical of him to say that considering he was or would have done the same in that "decade of wandering" (22-32). Its not news that men tend to have an extensive sexual history than women. He was probably referring to the hookup culture.
Being a hypocrite doesn't make someone wrong.
The error there comes from deploying a double standard. Although the statement made might not fit the technical description of a double standard, the attitude displayed certainly implies the commenter feels like if a woman has a lot of sex she's a dirty whore, and if a man has a lot of sex he's the "mack daddy"