Look up

Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
20
Likes
23


Does anybody know where in the world to move to if one does not want to look up and see this?
You could move to San Ignacio in Belize, its beautiful here and no funky clouds.
 





Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
2,111
Likes
5,235
This all started in 1999 with Ken Welch filing reports about Houston being hit. Then it happened here and thanks to his reports I knew what I was watching, so I filed my reports also. This whole thing did not exist before April/May 1999. If you don't believe me then pull out any of your photos before 1999 and I'll bet my Harley that you won't see any chemtrails in those pictures. Like I said, I WAS THERE WHEN IT STARTED and it is a real thing that did not exist before 1999. Now, if you're wondering where all that missing money might be, just imagine the budget it takes to pull off this massive aerial operation and maybe that ?? gets answered...

Contrails - South Carolina Said Sprayed Today 5-3-99 <--this is when it all started...
http://www.rense.com/ufo3/contex.htm

Chemtrails Over South Carolina 3-8-04
http://www.rense.com/general50/cchm.html

As you can see from the reports I used the nom de guerres Keyser Sose and DUDEKHAN (Chief of the Dudes) to file the reports under. See, as I been saying, I was "Dude" or "The Dude" ("or El Duderino if you aren't into the whole brevity thing, man...") long before The Big Lebowski ever came out.;)
 





SkepticCat

Established
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
471
Likes
1,318
27657254_10210690028702674_7042108835464750300_n.jpg

This all started in 1999 with Ken Welch filing reports about Houston being hit. Then it happened here and thanks to his reports I knew what I was watching, so I filed my reports also. This whole thing did not exist before April/May 1999. If you don't believe me then pull out any of your photos before 1999 and I'll bet my Harley that you won't see any chemtrails in those pictures. Like I said, I WAS THERE WHEN IT STARTED and it is a real thing that did not exist before 1999. Now, if you're wondering where all that missing money might be, just imagine the budget it takes to pull off this massive aerial operation and maybe that ?? gets answered...
The whole world is just a criminal operation at this point. People go to work, many slaving for minimum wages, then come back home crash in front of the TV where they're continously fed lies. Meanwhile, deep state pockets trillions of dollars much of which is indeed likely diverted unto poisoning those same worker drones.

The main problem is very simple: People have never contemplated the idea that authorities might be lying to them. Sure, governments do horrible stuff in movies and also, as paperwork shows, did previously, to other people, over and over again throughout history... but they would never lie to me. Once you collapse this simple assumption that 'government is always on our side and 100% trustworthy' it becomes obvious how foolish it was to place so much blind trust in the first place. Then again, it takes a special kind of derangement to perpetrate atrocities on this scale that is quite unbelievable.
 





Last edited:

mecca

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
6,023
Likes
10,030
Once you collapse this simple assumption that 'government is always on our side and 100% trustworthy' it becomes obvious how foolish it was to place so much blind trust in the first place.
Yeah it's more like never on our side and never trustworthy.
 





SkepticCat

Established
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
471
Likes
1,318
Yeah it's more like never on our side and never trustworthy.
Literally satanists, you couldn't possibly face a worse enemy.

-

There are 81,000+ Facebook followers of this Vigilant Citizen website. If all of you would make an active effort towards exposing what is happening it could really make a difference. The alternative is sitting back and waiting to get destroyed while everyone you know will suffer the consequences of inaction.




-


Below, Orgonite. I have no experience with it or technical knowledge about it. It seems to provide clear results, however.

 





Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
2,111
Likes
5,235
 





SkepticCat

Established
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
471
Likes
1,318


https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/

linked Harvard University Website article said:
Harvard's Solar Geoengineering Research Program

Overarching goals
Produce research that advances solar geoengineering’s science and technology frontier, publishing high-impact papers, and disseminating ideas that are taken up by other researchers and government research programs.

Take an active stance on research with a unique mandate to develop new path-breaking technologies that might improve solar geoengineering’s effectiveness and reduce its risks.

Employ Harvard’s convening power to bring together scientists, environmental leaders, and government officials to discuss the technology and its governance.

Advance science and technology, assess efficacy and risks, and lay out governance options and social implications.

Track 1: Advancing Science and Technology

Harvard's Solar Geoengineering Research Program will develop methods that might reduce the risks and improve the efficacy of solar geoengineering when compared to the injection of sulfates into the stratosphere, which has been the standard proposal since the 1970s. Specific examples include:

  1. Develop novel solid aerosols that might:
    • reduce or even reverse ozone loss by neutralizing stratospheric chlorine,
    • have optical properties that greatly reduce stratospheric heating compared to sulfate aerosol.
  2. Develop methods to accurately estimate the radiative forcing from solar geoengineering using existing observing systems and, where appropriate, perform conceptual development of new observing systems.
  3. Develop field experiments that could enable in situ tests of chemistry and aerosol dynamics.
Track 2: Assessing Efficacy and Risks

Harvard's Solar Geoengineering Research Program will devote most of its effort to scientific research to improve the understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering (e.g., health impacts) and of its efficacy in reducing climate risks (e.g., reducing sea level rise or extreme events). Specific examples include:

  1. Understand the interaction of solar geoengineering with the carbon cycle.
  2. Understand historical analogs such as the impact of volcanic eruptions on extreme precipitation or on the mass-balance of the Greenland icecap.
  3. Understand the environmental risks that arise once materials are introduced into the stratosphere descend into the lower atmosphere.
  4. Understand the extent to which solar geoengineering reduces extreme temperatures and to quantify the resulting health and welfare benefits.
Track 3: Laying out Governance Options and Social Implications

The largest challenge for solar geoengineering is not the technology itself, but rather the governance of its testing and possible deployment in a divided, multipolar world. Hargard's Solar Geoengineering Research Program will support a diverse range of research in the social sciences. Examples include:

  1. Research public perceptions and risk attitudes; e.g., use survey methods to explore how knowledge about solar geoengineering influences people’s willingness to commit to emissions reduction.
  2. Address concerns that solar geoengineering could reduce incentives to mitigate; e.g., explore the possibility of novel “Climate Clubs,” in which a coalition of nations requires members to commit to major emissions reductions as a condition of participating in the decision-making process regarding whether and how much solar geoengineering should be deployed.
  3. Fund at least two country studies to engage scientists and decision-makers in the Philippines and one other developing country in research on the risks, benefits, and governance of solar geoengineering.
Crosscutting principles
Open access: Full transparency with open-access publications and liberal data sharing. Discourage patents and any form of IP protection.

Collaborative: Work with researchers within Harvard and across the world. Continue the successful visiting scholars program that facilitates outside collaborators, and encourage SGRP researchers to spend time abroad.

Public Engagement: Inform the public in ways that empowers citizens to engage in the discussion around solar geoengineering.

Policy-relevant: Actively work on policy-relevant research questions and then ‘translate’ the resulting research into publicly accessible documents.
-

-

-

Below linked are a few recent uploads to YouTube regarding the allegedly non-existent 'chemtrails' available for your consideration.






Wikipedia article said:
The chemtrail conspiracy theory is the false claim that long-lasting condensation trails, called "chemtrails" by proponents, consist of chemical or biological agents left in the sky by high-flying aircraft and deliberately sprayed for purposes undisclosed to the general public.[1] Believers in the theory argue that normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly and contrails that do not dissipate must contain additional substances.[2][3] Those who subscribe to the theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be solar radiation management,[2] weather modification, psychological manipulation, human population control, or biological or chemical warfare and that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.[1][4]

The arguments have been dismissed by the scientific community; these are normal water-based contrails that are routinely left by high-flying aircraft under certain atmospheric conditions.[5] Although proponents have tried to prove that the chemical spraying does take place, their analyses have been flawed or based on misconceptions.[6][7] Because of the persistence of the conspiracy theory and questions about government involvement, scientists and government agencies around the world have repeatedly explained that the supposed chemtrails are in fact normal contrails.[2][8][9]

The term chemtrail is a portmanteau of the words chemical and trail, as contrail is of condensation and trail.[10]
-
-



Source: http://barbfeick.com/healthinfo/alzheimers.htm

linked website said:
I have known two wonderful people who got Alzheimer's. It is such a sad disease. You visit and they no longer know who you are. I don't think it was a common in the past as it is now. Some people will argue that it just wasn't diagnosed as Alzheimer's. I don't buy that argument. The symptoms are too evident and unmistakable. The graph shows the increase just since 1980. The author of the site that I copied the graph from links Alzheimer's to aluminum toxicity from chemtrails. The source of aluminum toxicity is debatable but aluminum toxicity as a contributing cause of Alzheimer's should not be ignored. - bfg
 





Last edited: