Yeah, everything is going as planned. Iran has been the target for a very long time and it's nothing new. The only difference is that recently, they are voicing their thoughts loud and clear.Quite ominous what is going on @vigilante71 Iran was the last country on the list they would war with that General Wesley Clark unveiled.
Stay safe God willing,
As Trump Tweets Threats, Warnings of His Team 'Working in Lock Step to Lay Groundwork' for War With Iran
"Everything they're doing right now is only compatible with a policy of confrontation."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/07/23/trump-tweets-threats-warnings-his-team-working-lock-step-lay-groundwork-war-iran
I can't possibly comprehend the feeling of the certainty of outbreak of war and the changes it promises to lives of everyone you know. Its unnerving actually.US ‘prepared’ and may strike Iran next month – reports
https://www.rt.com/news/434399-us-ready-bomb-iran/
They operate behind a veil for their lies and deception and coercion using the Hijacked nations.The thing that bothers me the most is that warmongers are shown to the world as peace-makers and freedom fighters.
Agreed!If Israelis weren't such cowards they would take on Iran country vs country. If Israel actually fought its own battles in this day and age they wouldn't last too long.
Apparently defeating or opposing Pro-Zionist plans in the middle east is considered a threat to "peace". It can not get any clearer what the word "peace" really means in their heads, now that they blame all their failures on Iran.I just find it incredible that vast numbers of people can be put under the delusion that Iran, who have not played an offensive part of ANY war in 200 years is a threat to anybody and should now be deemed as a major threat to world peace.
You'lĺ need a pretty big piece of paper to list USA's list of adversaries over the same period. All threats to world peace of course.
It's laughable really to the unwoolen but as Karly and others have intimated the consequences of this next conflict could have serious reverberations world wide.
"...any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal."The thing that bothers me the most is that warmongers are shown to the world as peace-makers and freedom fighters.
You make interesting points. However Iraq would probably like to disagree on this statement.... "Iran, who have not played an offensive part of ANY war in 200 years"I just find it incredible that vast numbers of people can be put under the delusion that Iran, who have not played an offensive part of ANY war in 200 years is a threat to anybody and should now be deemed as a major threat to world peace.
You'lĺ need a pretty big piece of paper to list USA's list of adversaries over the same period. All threats to world peace of course.
It's laughable really to the unwoolen but as Karly and others have intimated the consequences of this next conflict could have serious reverberations world wide.
I almost posted this in my NGOs thread!
white helmets