It's just your opinion which of course is wrong as you're not right about anything.Rebuilding an entire city, its streets and walls, and the temple, would obviously take many years. So the above verse in no way contradicts nor supersedes the previous command given to Ezra 13 years earlier.
Strong's Hebrew: 7620. שְׁבֻעַ (shabua) a period of seven (days, years), heptad, weekWhere in SCRIPTURE does it tell us this please? This erroneous assumption of yours has already been utterly refuted. Please take the time to actually read and think about the verses that have already been shared.
In Daniel's prophecy shabua/seven is 7 years... not seven solar years but 360 weeks.
No the second coming of Christ did not incarnate in JAHill and the quran is not from YHWH.No claim has ever been personally made that John Anthony Hill (JAH) is Jesus. Jesus was the human son of the virgin Mary, whom Christ INCARNATED 2000 years ago (John 1:14). It is the Second Coming of CHRIST that is prophesied which, according to Christ, will be in a new body (from Joseph-Ephraim - Gen. 49:10, 22-24) WITH A NEW NAME (Rev. 2:17, 3:12, 19:12) that nobody knows except for those who receive it. Perhaps you didn't get the memo?
And yes, the Koran (Quran) is obviously from YHWH, as YHWH Himself clearly states. Don't let Satan continue to con you into repeating his satanic misinterpretation of Isa. 14:12-17. It's obviously wrong, just like his satanic interpretation of Dan. 9:24-27 that he has you repeating is wrong. One would have thought all of the numeric and scriptural contortions you had to go through to try to make it believable would have been your first clue it's wrong.
You're a troll. So there is no point talking with you.