Is LGBT+ acceptance campaign starting to backfire?

Jun 26, 2019
The only topics you have commented on this forum are this one, “transgender abuse” and the “socialized to be rapist” thread where in each case you come down on the right.
First off, the very first comments I made had nothing to do with any of those. Ive only been posting a week. And if you actually looked at my replies you'd see they aren't random ramblings bolstered by religion or politics. I didnt align myself to any particular ones. My opinions on transgender ideology with regards to children and the LGBT community being used as a scapegoat to push an agenda has nothing to do with right wing ideology because there are LGBT individuals who ARE actually in fact right wing. And who themselves have actually spoke out with similar views to mine about these topics. Seriously, google conservative LGBT youtubers and they'll pop up. And the article I linked in the r*pe thread came from a FEMINIST criticising myths about r*pe culture and reverse sexism. I don't know why you're so insistent on categorizing people according to what little you grasp on an internet forum about their "alleged" beliefs. But it honestly makes you look like a self-righteous asswipe.

Whether it’s insinuating that there is an agenda behind the LGBT movement or going on anti-feminist rants. You can pretend it’s above politics but it shows.
What does not believing men are socialised to be rapists have to do with politics? What does believing four year olds shouldn't be taught about the "gender and sexuality" spectrum before their time have to do with politics? Not everything is about politics.

Sharon Slater is opposed to all sex-Ed due to religious beliefs and has a crusade of dis-information and pseudoscience.
Okay so . . . . Did I say anything about Sharon Slater? If people's personal convictions are such an obstruction to material they're affiliated with then you should be completely disregarding r*pe culture because of the stances of several of It's forerunners from the 70s who basically attributed sexual violence as an inherent part of ALL men. And for the record I am not against sex-ed but this is taking it too far especially when parents can't remove their kids from certain classes.

First I don’t just accept something I see on YouTube as truth without verification like most people in the conspiracy community. She seizes on parts of curriculums out of context and puts her spin on it to make it seem like it’s something it is not. I wouldn’t be surprised if she just printed some of those pamphlets her self either. I wasn’t convinced watching a person hold up an article they printed from their computer to be honest.
It's a good thing you don't but I'm pretty sure this isn't fear-mongering. I looked into some of the source material and yep, it's pretty much telling the truth. California's new sex ed curriculum? AB-329 allows for parents to opt their children out of sexual education. However, the bill prohibits parents from opting their children out of materials that discuss gender, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation. If there's no agenda, why can't parents pull their kids if they are not comfortable with the materials used? Especially when the Health Education Framework affirms language in AB-329 and included books and supplemental materials such as the Amazon bestseller “S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-to-Know Sexuality Guide to Get You Through Your Teens and Twenties,” a book that describes sexual activity and gender theory.

The California Board of Education removed this book and several others from the curriculum after outrage from Californian families. Just so you get an idea of what was going on those supplementary materials (though not all of them have even been removed), it includes descriptions of anal sex, bondage and other sexual activity. And the author is Heather Corrina -"Heather Corinna is an author, activist, and Internet publisher with a focus on progressive, affirming sexuality. She is a self-described "queer, rabblerousing, polymath." She was one of the pioneers of positive human sexuality on the Internet." Going by her bio and your logic you'd think she most likely is more liberal right? So why can supplementary materials be affiliated with one kind of political ideology but whenever it's anything right of you, it's a problem? And yes, the other programmes mentioned in the video do exist.

Last edited:
Jan 22, 2018
Hi, I’m Awoken2 and I claim to oppose religion but when it suits my agenda
.....MY agenda?...... ohhh come on shorty, your credibility will soon measure less than your stature.

You are now struggling to differentiate between somebody exposing an agenda to somebody having an agenda.....

....and anyway, how can a single person have an agenda anyway?....explain that one to me?

Last edited:
Mar 15, 2017
Pretty sure the company is fine here. If the company owns said intranet why should they allow this man to post religious propaganda? Other employees could see it, they have every right to fire him, just like I couldn’t make post’s calling Christians delusional children who believe in fairy tales and use their religion as a weapon of oppression.

If there’s a problem with IKEA it’s that it’s a mega-corporation who pushes the idea that you won’t be happy unless you spend the bucks to deck out your house with Swedish furniture.

I just love the right wing victimization machine.

You shouldn’t eat Oreos because they are awful for you, but sure get offended over some limited release packaging.
Since when is expressing personal opinions on a private employee only forum a sackable offence?!

If this is happening overseas what makes you think it won't come to the USA as well?