He is southern so he believes that it is a mans role to do things like that. It doesn't quite annoy him, it's not how his parents raised him.Yes, I believe you that you love to test social norms.
I mean... like I said.... I think I would give a brief look of annoyance.
I think I'd dislike it but I don't think I'd actually say anything. I don't think it's serious enough to really say anything (unless it's repeated).
I'm not in favor of the elimination of gender boundaries and I assume he's not either. I view it as cultural Marxism.
He could carry all of it and she could wrap her arm in his that would be sweet!wow I did not even notice that..... look how she's carrying the thing on her head.... I didn't see that.... I just sort of ignored it and didn't think about it..... I looked at it very quickly and I think I saw the smaller image in the google image thing
I think he should carry the heavier stuff and maybe she could carry a lighter thing... but I do think he should carry whatever is heaviest..... I don't agree with what is going on now that I see the more details
He needs to be free to protect her.He could carry all of it and she could wrap her arm in his that would be sweet!
Well...he could always drop their things, protect her, or even use the suitcase as a weapon...but it’s gentlemanly to carry things for the woman. Why do you think us women get married?He needs to be free to protect her.
This is why men are in charge of protection. When trouble comes, every second counts. Who has time to drop all the crap that women want us to carry? I guarantee you that's her stuff in the suitcase on her head.Well...he could always drop their things, protect her, or even use the suitcase as a weapon...but it’s gentlemanly to carry things for the woman. Why do you think us women get married?
There are ways to treat the either gender. They are both meant to be treated differently. Concept of Lady however is outdated and anyone still holding onto to needs to grow up and realize that this is not a fictional Victorian Era.That is a good point!
Do you think that women should be treated differently ("as a lady?")
Ugh incels.Are you saying women can be knights?
If so, I agree with you. Of course, women can be knights. Look at Joan of Arc, for example. There have been cases where women did fight as knights.
I think in some cases the women pretended be men. I think there have been multiple famous cases where women pretended to be men in order to fight as knights- maybe for some patriotic sense of duty. I mean there's the movie Mulan that I'm sure is familiar to people.
Chivalry is a code of conduct for knights.
"Chivalry, or the chivalric code, is an informal, varying code of conduct developed between 1170 and 1220, but never decided on or summarized in a single document. It was associated with the medieval Christian institution of knighthood;[1] knights' and gentlewomen's behaviours were governed[when?] by chivalrous social codes.[2] The ideals of chivalry were popularized in medieval literature, especially the Matter of Britain and Matter of France, the former based on Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britanniae, written in the 1130s, which introduced the legend of King Arthur.[3] All of these were taken as historically accurate until the beginnings of modern scholarship in the 19th century."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chivalry
apparently, it also regulates the behavior of gentlewomen.... I mean I think obviously knights were mostly men but there's been cases where women served as knights....
so I think it applies to knights mostly..... if we are looking at it historically as you suggest...... and you're right that it's not necessarily specific to men.... but I think the only women it would apply to would be gentlewomen (which is a term I'm not familiar with, so I don't know who fits in that group) and women who are serving as knights.... but women who served as knights.... while they did exist..... would have been the exception rather than the norm (even today, the most feminist of women aren't calling for drafting women in armed forces).... it mostly applies to men.... but also to women in some cases... however, I doubt it would apply in the same exact way... I'm sure the codes of chivalry would have had somewhat different rules for a (almost always male) knight and for a gentlewoman
I was only half serious and you were actually serious.This is why men are in charge of protection. When trouble comes, every second counts. Who has time to drop all the crap that women want us to carry? I guarantee you that's her stuff in the suitcase on her head.
Suitcase as a weapon, for Pete's sake.
That's why men need to be in charge of protection. Women just don't understand how serious it is.I was only half serious and you were actually serious.
I guess not.That's why men need to be in charge of protection. Women just don't understand how serious it is.
chivalry is dead, and feminism killed it.If so, who killed it and can it come back?
Nice to know you don't think equality is important.saps our moral energy, distracts from more important issues.
Not really. The only think feminism says on genderedmakes men and women neurotically monitor gendered behavior
This sort of thing existed long before feminism was even a thing.promotes distrust and tit for tat in relationships
I also need you to explain this one since I don't quite understand your logic here.promotes redistribution over creation
Trying to be nice to get something out of someone isn't altruism.turns altruism into something evil
If you want to blame something for this, blame our economic system.unnecessarily makes each gender unfairly compete with the other
This is also the work of our economic system, not feminism.doubles work output per household
Also the fault of our economic system. You are blaming feminism for the exploitation of capitalsim.gives parents less time to spend with kids
No, it doesn't?encourages a taking advantage of each gender's proclivities (e.g. horny men, pliant women)
just to get you started
The only think feminism says on gendered
Yes, I am Southern tooHe is southern so he believes that it is a mans role to do things like that. It doesn't quite annoy him, it's not how his parents raised him.
I think that's more a perception than a reality. I usually get a smile and a thank you. At worst, just kinda ignored.opening a door for a woman these days, and a guy can be called sexist or chauvinist because he would be accused of believing that the woman couldnt do it herself or she isnt strong enough.
And now guys who cry at the thought of a woman talking back to them, talk about chivalry being endangered because of feminism.If you mean the Knight class of feudalism, the enforcers of the nobilities’ illegal property claims, then no they no longer exist, they did however evolve into the police/military class and perhaps even the managerial/business class, just as feudalism evolved into capitalism.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/chivalry
“The concept of chivalry in the sense of “honourable and courteous conduct expected of a knight” was perhaps at its height in the 12th and 13th centuries and was strengthened by the Crusades, which led to the founding of the earliest orders of chivalry, the Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem (Hospitalers) and the Order of the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon (Templars), both originally devoted to the service of pilgrims to the Holy Land. In the 14th and 15th centuries the ideals of chivalry came to be associated increasingly with aristocratic display and public ceremony rather than service in the field.”
Born in the savagery of the Crusades and later “embodied” by the elite. Hard pass on chivalry.