IDI AMIN: JEWS CONTROLS THE ECONOMIES OF USA AND UK

[Canuckster]

Has that ever been the argument though? I mean when people say that there are people (that call themselves Jews)that are influencing global politics, do you really think they're saying that every single Jew in existence is in on this plot?

Is it antisemitic to point out that these men all have Jewish backgrounds?

Does this mean that you would forgive standing members of the Nazi party a pass because they weren't all in on the plot?

 

[KoncreteMind]

Does this mean that you would forgive standing members of the Nazi party a pass because they weren't all in on the plot?

Didnt America forgive Nazis when they did "Operation Paperclip"?

As far as me, I dont have a problem with people who are Nationalists and/or Socialists (thats what Nazi stands for) so I wouldnt have a problem with members of a Nationalist/Socialist party. Now as far as what the party did during WW2? Thats a different story, that if you read the thread about it in the den section, some people believe was a hoax or severely exaggerated.

 

[Canuckster]

Depends.

Are you pointing it out since you're implying, either directly or through dog whistles, that it's problem that Jews specifically control the media? Yes. That's pretty antisemitic.

'cause you know, the issue isn't that Jews control the media. It's that the media is controlled in the first place.

If every Jew vanished from the earth tomorrow, someone else would take control of all those organizations and it would be the same thing.

The truth cannot be anti semetic, it simply is the truth, whether or not the jews are offended by it or not. Facts are facts, media is controlled by powerful Jewish interests as is our government. And since powerful Jewish interests are directly influential on Jewish interests as a whole then yes that's the way things are. And saying someone else would be worse is not a defense of the facts.

 

[Canuckster]

Didnt America forgive Nazis when they did "Operation Paperclip"?

As far as me, I dont have a problem with people who are Nationalists and/or Socialists (thats what Nazi stands for) so I wouldnt have a problem with members of a Nationalist/Socialist party. Now as far as what the party did during WW2? Thats a different story, that if you read the thread about it in the den section, some people believe was a hoax or severely exaggerated.

America didn't have a freaking clue about operation paperclip, and if they did at the time it was implemented, you can bet your ass average Joe American at the time wouldn't have tolerated it. As for the rest of your response, that's a whitewash to avoid the question. I don't believe for a second that you would tolerate a standing member of the Nazi party waving his flag around, no way. Are you saying that as long as they promised to leave jews alone that you'd be ok with it? Please

 

[KoncreteMind]

America didn't have a freaking clue about operation paperclip, and if they did at the time it was implemented, you can bet your ass average Joe American at the time wouldn't have tolerated it. As for the rest of your response, that's a whitewash to avoid the question. I don't believe for a second that you would tolerate a standing member of the Nazi party waving his flag around, no way. Are you saying that as long as they promised to leave jews alone that you'd be ok with it? Please

Yes if a Nationalist/Socialist (this is what a Nazi is by the way) cut the “we’re superior than everyone and if you’re not us you’ll die” part out of their beliefs then I’d have no problem with them identifying with the ideals of nationalism and socialism.

And if you want to absolve lower end Americans for what those at the top decided with Operation paperclip then you have to do the same with lower end Nazis. Because their platform wasn’t “hate Jews” but was about nationalism/socialism.