Tubby Walters
Rookie
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 51
Everyone says the sources they read are true and very rarely sway from that.
The popular, yet ultimately pointless, example is were ancient egyptians nubian, Arab, or other?
In my opinion, who cares. It doesn't matter. Yet so many get in arguments because their "sources" are correct.
This, of course, applies to many modern left vs right arguments. Why do so many here get into needless arguments over their so called sources being correct and the opposing viewpoint is automatically dismissed?
Religion and spirituality is a bit different imo, its all faith based, but why lose your sanity over various stats bases when we are on a site that frequently acknowledges most stat bases cant
Not be trusted to begin with?
The popular, yet ultimately pointless, example is were ancient egyptians nubian, Arab, or other?
In my opinion, who cares. It doesn't matter. Yet so many get in arguments because their "sources" are correct.
This, of course, applies to many modern left vs right arguments. Why do so many here get into needless arguments over their so called sources being correct and the opposing viewpoint is automatically dismissed?
Religion and spirituality is a bit different imo, its all faith based, but why lose your sanity over various stats bases when we are on a site that frequently acknowledges most stat bases cant
Not be trusted to begin with?