So... picture this. Your crossing the street within 500ft of a riot or protest that you aren’t involved in and someone commits vehicular homicide by running you down as you make your way across. That is now justified. Someone steals a pack of gum from a store, store owner shoots them dead. Now justified. Store owner suspects person stole a pack of gum from the store when they actually didn’t, store owner shoots them dead.. now justified.So they’re not letting protestors block the roads anymore, and drivers probably need protection against then situations where the protestors are trying to swarm their cars, open the doors, pull them out and beat them to half to death as we’ve seen provably a dozen times in this thread, they need protection to be able to hit those people with their car if they’re trying to get away. Also I’m pretty sure in Florida you are already able to shoot people for breaking into your store no? Regardless, there needs to be new laws, now that any time the rumour of a police officer shooting someone, true or not, justified or not, sets communities to start looting and burning stores en masse, yeah business owners need protection against that.
blocking roads to protest and destroying random peoples stores to protest are criminal, I’m sure people can find new ways to protest if those are gone
I don’t see how passing laws to make us more lawless is going to solve the problem of lawlessness. Use of deadly force against a deadly threat.. makes sense. Use of deadly force against anything less then that does not.We have a process to use against people who commit property crimes. There is a reason property crimes don’t qualify for capital sentences. But I guess we can just throw all that out the window cuz we got our feelings hurt people are demanding police are held accountable to the same justice system the rest of us are??