Disagreeing with you and asking you to support your accusations isn't trolling, and it's not passive-aggressive. I'm literally just asking you to back up what you said, and it shouldn't be this difficult for you. If you can't, then the accusations are false... and they clearly are.
Which post did
@Thunderian say this? I need to see the context.
There is video and audio of the police blocking the exit, so at this point you can't absolutely confirm what happened and neither can I. Hence I used 'IF'. It's actually beside the point. I've already stated the following to you in post #4,771 and #4,803:
"Shutting down traffic is dangerous no matter who does it. If you had given anyone a chance, I'm pretty sure most would have agreed. But your first reaction was hysteria and assumptions."
"If the Trump caravan was purposely blocking traffic, WHO ON THIS THREAD HAS CONDONED IT?"
Do I need to reword that so you understand it? You keep banging on this point and DISTRACTING from your initial false premise that 'everyone' condoned it.
Can you explain where I've done this? Please include the post #'s for context.
I don't understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying you didn't really mean 'Your all a bunch of hypocrites' when you said 'Your all a bunch of hypocrites'?
When I asked you to show us WHO in this thread condoned the traffic block, you didn't and still haven't. So, who here were you referring to specifically?