Journeyman
Established
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2020
- Messages
- 381
As I said earlier, this one rings all the bells with me, but I respect you withholding belief until a standard of evidence is met.The problem with this and many videos past is they try too hard. He omits that there are four waves on the 666 he claims on the t-shirt, stretches the orange coloring a bit as well. Another quibble is they take say five pictures out of 1000's to prove a point meaning only those count? Also, many of the pictures are from a well known tourist trap where they are all laid out on a wall for selfies. But some things are harder to ignore like the fact she was in a video and her mom was tight with the creator about Sandy Hook of all things. The guy is quite free with Brians's name as well not exactly making it fit.
This may well be a trap. Make someone America's missing sweetheart, leak some stuff to conspiracists forums and then go after them when people go Alex Jones and say it is a psyop. That said, do not let it trap or distract you. It distracted me for I want to research it but have a busy day ahead which will take me away for a bit.
I wish someone could make an irrefutable list of things not formed too hard to fit. The fact she made the music video is a start. Some. with the keyword being some of the pictures fit. The 666 tat on the cops hand is there as well and noticed only at the end of the vid. His actions and wording stood out to me. What rules or restrictions can this case merit on us all? Is this just for kicks and giggles for the rulers of the world if it is all a ruse?
What started working on me, again, was - 1 - the funeral being live cast, 2- the continued oddness of the birth father, 3- this article and Dog the Bounty Hunter... https://www.foxnews.com/us/brian-laundrie-manhunt-dog-bounty-hunter-tipster-laundries-park-september. The Dog the Bounty Hunter entrance was a jump the shark moment for me. Sure, he like the media enjoys exposure and hits and this kind of story provides that.
My friend is miffed as well who gave me info but has said our former boss is just an information auditor on the case. And I am still waiting for a Gematria-type take to be plainly accurate without trying too hard. I think it is healthy at times to take a skeptics stance to weed out the fact from fiction. But not all the time, like some playing devils advocate on everything. Just happened - the officer in Utah has stepped away from his post or quit.
I saw someone yesterday had found the (very rare) name of Gabrielle Petito on the White House visitor logs from Obama era and they dug other stuff up about a Barbara Petito. A recurring pattern is that each and every one of these on their own could be nothing, but as more and more are assembled it starts to draw you in. Maybe that's the trap.
What you've said earlier about falling into the temptation to research it. Reminds me of one of my favourite yt channels 'quantum of conscience' I cant find the vid I was thinking of but this one is close:
and because it's not really fair to drop a vid on someone the precis is that all of our digging is essentially another way of playing ball. They drop the crumbs for us to find, it's all distraction and sending us down rabbit holes that never end.
Which brings me to my first impulse on Gabby Petito which I think was probably the right call. Yes it's dodgy, yes entire chunks if not all of it are fake, but what good can I do if I follow every lead and confirm it's a giant false flag as so much is? Will it help others? Will it help me?
Once you've established that we're ruled by deceivers, by a continual manipulation of our attention and our emotions is the next logical step to withhold that attention?