Footage Of Naked Boy Climbing Out Royal Family Castle Window

Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#41
I was unable to get a good screen shot, but I managed to get a hold of the video just by itself so it can be looked at closely for further speculation


Everyone is free to make up their own mind and draw from their own conclusions whether or not the video is real.
 





Last edited:
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#42
I am not convinced regarding that video Loki put up either. Funny how the "marketing ploy" occurred AFTER the original video broke. Usually those ploys occur first o_O
Neither am I and I agree. I actually checked a few sources trying to debunk the video, they all come up with different reasons for this marketing ploy and none of their stories even match up lol. Not only that, but I have yet been unable to find the first season of this The Royals show where the supposed TV clip came from. There is nothing and I can find pretty much any TV shows/seasons/episodes without a problem.
 





Last edited:
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
1,207
Likes
1,966
#43
They're probably creating the episode as we speak. It'll come online so everyone can watch and people will be laughing at us because we are so gullible.

Where there is smoke there is fire. The odd and disturbing video came out FIRST. That's all I need to know. Of course guilty people will attempt to cover their lies. Always have and always will.

Had the marketing ploy occurred first there would be little wiggle room for CT.
Of course the video came out first, that's the marketing ploy!
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#44
That's not how a marketing ploy works. Marketing is meant to enhance the image of something or draw viewers not to create outrage or backlash. If it truly was marketing they would have shared the video loki posted, not the video that blew up online talking about naked child escaping the Palace.

Some of us are far too awake for nonsense like this. The media lies.

Christ on a cracker guys. This example we are looking at is nearly the perfect definition of a viral marketing campaign. You don't reveal that it's a viral marketing campaign first, that would defeat the viral aspect of it. You release some sort of viral video or website or what-have-you and then let it run rampant for a day or two, then once as many eyes as possible have seen it and are talking about it you send out a press release linking the viral campaign to your product. To do it the other way woudl defeat the purpose because nobody would believe it is real and thus nobody would be compelled by it. View the video through the lens that it is fake; a guy on a green screen being superimposed digitally onto Buckingham Palace and falling harmlessly onto a safety mat, probably only a few feet. Is the video still compelling? Would you want to dig into it or care about it or get invested? No, it's just a silly video. But, if you don't let anyone know it is fake beforehand then social media goes wild with theories and speculation, your video is shared all over the internet, and then when you reveal it was a marketing campaign at least a portion of those people who were following the story and became invested are going to check out your show or website. Sure, some people are going to be agitated you toyed with them or lose interest after it turns out to be fake, but you got the name of your show out there and it hardly cost you anything beyond the cost of filming and editing.

@Tanya as I've tried to explain already, I was mistaken when I said that this clip was in the show. That was a misunderstanding because when I first did a bit of research and commented on it I didn't really have the time to dig into it so my early understanding was that it was a clip for the show. It wasn't. It was actually a clip developed for the online show D-Throned, as I've previously explained in this thread, which is a supplementary online aspect of The Royals. They took the part from the clip that they knew might be taken as real and posted it to the internet a few days before their D-Throned site went live where they then posted the full video they'd created. The full clip that I've continuously linked to is literally the first post on the site I believe, because they made it specifically to be a viral marketing campaign and bring eyes to their website.

Here is a quote from Jonah Berger, marketing professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and author of Contagious: Why Things Catch On.

"There is a science behind why people share. It's not chance, and it's not random. If you understand the underlying science of human behavior, you can predict what people are going to pass on, and you can craft your own contagious content--whether it's messages, products or ideas--that people are more likely to spread."
They knew that the way they'd shot this video was going to fool a certain number of people who aren't as trained in analyzing digital footage and those people would share it because they believe it is real and if it is real then it is shocking. They succeeded, clearly.

If what I've said and shown you still hasn't convinced you, perhaps your fellow conspiracy theorists from Reddit will be able to. When this video was posted to /r/conspiracy this was an image shared by the top response:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-87w6DWoAAW6J_.jpg:large

For some reason it wouldn't embed, so you will have to click it. It details all the differences between the fake video and the actual Buckingham Palace. Because I'm not English and have never seen the Palace in person I personally would have never noticed how different the viral video's version is, I could mostly tell something was off with how the guy looked and interacted with his surroundings.

If you still don't believe maybe this breakdown will help: http://www.thatsnonsense.com/naked-man-escapes-buckingham-palace-video-debunked/

And if you're still not convinced that the poor falling fella is an actor and is fine, then, in the least offensive way possible, I must say that you don't seem to want to see the truth of the matter. If you choose to disagree with my assertion, that's fine, it's only my opinion after all.
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#45
Yeah, let's start a viral marketing campaign that immediately puts us on the defensive and creates all kinds of doubts and conspiracies that there might possibly be p***philia taking place at one of the highest levels of institution. Sounds like a great idea. How'd it work out for them o_O

Think that guy still has a job?

regarding the rest of your rant.

1.) Why would any normal person assume making a silly video of a princess' (clearly adult) lover climbing from a window and falling might be linked to p***philia charges? Please understand that most of the world doesn't view everything through a conspriacy-tinged lens.

2.) Thanks for being a rational adult and truthseeker. Somebody presents evidence to the contrary of your belief on a topic? Stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes, and hum really loudly. Nailed it. Lol.

Also, it wasn't a rant, it was an attempt at explaining the situation and why this is clearly not real. But enjoy your fantasy man.
 





Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#46
What bothers me about all of this is not so much that the video may or not be real, but where is the concern mentioned for the other two videos, where you CAN see and hear the disgusting acts of p***philia and a child being abused.

When the sole focus is all about whether or not one video is fake or real.....who cares? Is that more important to the other videos that cannot be disproved of what is taking place? There is something very wrong with a person when they are apathetic towards child abuse and p***philia.

@Loki do you have any other input on the other two videos I shared in this thread because I'm interested in what you have to say about them.
Because if not, this long drawn out discussion is getting boring and I don't think anyone cares as much about the video being a hoax or whatever, as much as you do.
 





Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#47
It's very simple loki. I believe this video:


over this shill piece:

http://dthronednews.tumblr.com/post/112600469003/reign-of-erroreleanors-latest-mishap-has-tongues

as well as your shill attempts to shill that same shill piece. It's that simple. Had the video you posted came out first there would be no CT. So tell your bosses to do a better job next time.
I looked up what shill means cause I have no clue lol. It says that they are paid, so do shills only come on to the forums during regular working business hours like a 9-5, 5 days a week because it says it is a job to them and get paid for it. Do shills come on forums during weekends or from home after work? I think its kinda fishy now that a person only comes on during work hours and never from home....like what is up with that? So far from what I've read reading Loki's posts, he only comes on the forums during work. It kinda lines up with the website I'm reading about paid shills.
 





Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#48
It does seem to take away all the attention and focus off of the real issues that should be discussed. I know the thread is titled about the video, but it's not what the thread is exclusively about.
 





Last edited:
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#49
@Loki I am not trying to single you out or insinuate that you are a paid shill or anything here, I'm just bothered by your lack of concern for the kids in the other videos and how the importance of proving one video to be possibly fake is that important to you. I'm sorry, but it really does concern me.
 





Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
1,846
Likes
2,044
#51
They are a thing and they are everywhere. Many of them are interns who are hoping they become good enough to be paid full time. They post all hours of the day from different countries. Many interns for TV but some are employees of marketing companies. If the company is big enough they hire their own teams.

They are also called astroturfing or astroturfers.
Well that explains a lot. I had some sneaky suspicions and I've learned to never ignore my intuition. There are a few posters here that I notice who only come on during a normal day shift schedule. It's odd for people to spend time on here while they're "at work" yeah cause this os your job lol. I couldn't figure out why out of everyone else on this forum, he's the only one desperate to disprove and discredit the video while ignoring the other two. Now I am convinced that the video is not what is being allegedly claimed.
 





Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
618
Likes
1,370
#52
1.) Why would any normal person assume making a silly video of a princess' (clearly adult) lover climbing from a window and falling might be linked to p***philia charges? Please understand that most of the world doesn't view everything through a conspriacy-tinged lens.

2.) Thanks for being a rational adult and truthseeker. Somebody presents evidence to the contrary of your belief on a topic? Stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes, and hum really loudly. Nailed it. Lol.

Also, it wasn't a rant, it was an attempt at explaining the situation and why this is clearly not real. But enjoy your fantasy man.
Some people seem to believe everything is part of "the conspiracy" or "the illuminatti!"

Christ on a cracker!! Epic lol
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#53
It's very simple loki. I believe this video:


over this shill piece:

http://dthronednews.tumblr.com/post/112600469003/reign-of-erroreleanors-latest-mishap-has-tongues

as well as your shill attempts to shill that same shill piece. It's that simple. Had the video you posted came out first there would be no CT. So tell your bosses to do a better job next time.
Oh god, you're one of those. Literally the worst type of truther. It's not my fault you can't understand how viral marketing works, and are unwilling to look at evidence submitted by other truthers (not a lowly shill like me) which I've simply compiled and presented here in an as easy-to-access-as-possible way so you wouldn't have to do any actual research yourself. I'm just going to assume that you didn't even attempt to look at the non-media-based evidence I posted. You can choose to take a look and apologize for being an asshat, or you can continue living in an alternate reality where everything is a conspiracy and logical explanations don't exist. Your being a fool has no impact on me, so you do you boo.
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#55
What bothers me about all of this is not so much that the video may or not be real, but where is the concern mentioned for the other two videos, where you CAN see and hear the disgusting acts of p***philia and a child being abused.

When the sole focus is all about whether or not one video is fake or real.....who cares? Is that more important to the other videos that cannot be disproved of what is taking place? There is something very wrong with a person when they are apathetic towards child abuse and p***philia.

@Loki do you have any other input on the other two videos I shared in this thread because I'm interested in what you have to say about them.
Because if not, this long drawn out discussion is getting boring and I don't think anyone cares as much about the video being a hoax or whatever, as much as you do.
Okay, you posted a thread about one specific video, the one that the title of the thread is about, so I clicked on the thread to see this footage of a naked boy (he's a man, but semantics, amirite?) climbing out of the royal palace. I come to the thread, click on the video, sift through a bunch of crazy CT YouTuber mess to watch the clip in question and immediately notice that it looks sketchy and not real at all. I notice in the comments that nobody is pointing out that this is almost certainly a fake video so I take a few minutes before heading home to do a little research to figure out if the video has been previously debunked or broken down. I find that it was created as part of a TV show, so I post that and head home. I come back and find that my little bit of evidence isn't enough, which is honestly understandable if you believe there was a huge media cover up of this incident. So I do more digging about this one video, as that is the one I came to the thread for and we were talking about, and I find out that it was actually made for the online show D-Throned, and despite what you and Scott believe, this is exactly how viral marketing is supposed to be done, but alright you don't think it was viral marketing and that's just a cover up, sure. So I post pictures where people have actually taken the time to analyze the footage against the actual Buckingham Palace which clearly shows that the video is a hoax and you guys just ignore that and begin accusing me of being a shill because I haven't offered any commentary on the other videos, which were never part of my interest in coming to this thread and were never mentioned in any of our exchanges here and so I've not watched them, and somehow that makes me a bad person and a shill.

Just because I've not watched those videos doesn't mean I don't care about the well-being of the children you say are involved, it just means that I joined this thread for the OP and was focused on helping you guys understand that it isn't a real video so you don't sound foolish saying that it is or go on to spread disinformation to others; or, at the very least, my breakdown and evidence would help others to understand the situation even if it didn't get through to you or FreeBritney or Scott.

I can't speak to the other videos, but the other videos being real doesn't make the original video real, and the original video not being real doesn't make the other videos fake. They are independent things that exist independently of one another.

But, for the record, though I don't feel this needs to be said, I feel horribly for any real victims of pedo sex rings. It's horrible to me that grown adults feel some twisted desire towards chidlren and are depraved enough to act on it, whether they are powerful people or not.
 





Last edited:

Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#56
No offense but loki isn't disagreeing. His technique and his posts reek of an agenda.
1.) She didn't say disagreeing, she said disproving. Which I've done if you actually read and look at my entire post, you just don't like it.

2.) I've got less of an agenda than you as I haven't advertised my book (well, I don't have a book, so congrats on writing a book) numerous times on this forum. I work a normal job that allows me a decent amount of down time, so I post here. Also, I've been a part of this community since the first boards, I've even been a moderator and administrator in the past. Just because I don't want "truthers" spreading disinfo to themselves doesn't mean I have some sinister ulterior motive. I happen to actually like getting to the truth of things, unlike some here it seems.
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#57
Well that explains a lot. I had some sneaky suspicions and I've learned to never ignore my intuition. There are a few posters here that I notice who only come on during a normal day shift schedule. It's odd for people to spend time on here while they're "at work" yeah cause this os your job lol. I couldn't figure out why out of everyone else on this forum, he's the only one desperate to disprove and discredit the video while ignoring the other two. Now I am convinced that the video is not what is being allegedly claimed.


Ugh. This is literally the definition of an echo chamber between you two. Logic and reasoning be damned.
 





Loki

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
401
Likes
981
#58
@Loki I am not trying to single you out or insinuate that you are a paid shill or anything here, I'm just bothered by your lack of concern for the kids in the other videos and how the importance of proving one video to be possibly fake is that important to you. I'm sorry, but it really does concern me.
I touched on this in another post but figured I would leave one more for good measure. I was only trying to help you guys, I didn't realize you would be so obstinate towards evidence to the contrary of your belief, I guess I should have known better. If you intended for this thread to be about pizzagate and p***philia on a broader spectrum then I apologize for making it about the original post and title of the thread. Also, perhaps you should change the title of the thread and add the other videos to the original post. I've not looked at the other videos, and generally I like to avoid p***philia so I'm not sure if I will, but I'm happy to step away from this thread so you all can continue to discuss those. For whatever it's worth, I never said anything about those videos or intended to insinuate that because the naked falling guy was fake then the rest are too. That's not actually how things work so I didn't realize it may come off that way to you or others.

Unless you guys shout me out I'll leave this thread alone.