I didn’t say you were bashing any member on this thread.So then nobody here is actually bashing anyone, are they?
I said nothing about republicans but it is a right wing movement pushed by right wingers. The issues about status and being able to provide are a direct result of capitalism.Your the one once again bringing your insecurities of republicans and captialism into dialouge.
Maybe it’s for the thrills.Nobody here has still been able to address the data behind why a dating preference would be based off of someones income and social status...
I would agree, but nobody here is referring to anyone in a derogatory manner. I just laid out the data and presented a hypothesis based off of social science and biology to point out why such things are so.I didn’t say you were bashing any member on this thread.
I think it’s rather silly to base assumptions on biological/religious reasons.
Of course I’ll contradict myself and agree with your biological assumption to an extent. But there are numerous factors as to why a woman/man gets around.
Relationships are not for all people.
The stigmas they face of being called a whore etc is rather sad imo.
I mean if they go around cheating intentionally then yeah. That’s wrong. But some are not hardwired for relationships/family goals
Now we’re understanding each otherI would agree, but nobody here is referring to anyone in a derogatory manner. I just laid out the data and presented a hypothesis based off of social science and biology to point out why such things are so.
I wouldn’t say mate selection.Nobody has been able to address this, but I would still like to know...
Why does data show that income and social status is a considerable and high ranking factor in mate selection with women? Not just in one collection of research findings, but multiple... In men it shows that looks rank high in terms of potential mate factor, but with women income and social status ranks near the top in deciding factors.
There are studies that correlate this to biology and womans innate survival instinct for herself and her offspring. If not that, then what else?
Phil not everything contrary to you is a right wing conspiracy.I said nothing about republicans but it is a right wing movement pushed by right wingers. The issues about status and being able to provide are a direct result of capitalism.
Rollo Tamasi, The Rational MaleI wouldn’t say mate selection.
Women have kids with low income men.
Now the survival instinct and hooking up with higher income men. I mean yeah I get it. Security, etc.
But a lot of the women I know in person seem to be content where they are. At least on the surface.
Who knows. I don’t think you need to research further. You very well could be right.
But I also think small examples like my wife and some of the mom’s on this board will disagree with you. So again...another mystery on VC
Phil not everything contrary to you is a right wing conspiracy.
Im not disputing that. I am just merely pointing out mating preferences according to biology. Its not the end all be all, but a mans resources to ensure provision and security is a major factor in mate selection with women, especially if they seek to create a family(most of them do).Inside the Dangerous Convergence of Men’s-Rights Activists and the Alt-Right
Racist killer James Jackson’s online behavior reveals how these two hate-fueled groups are coming together.www.thecut.com
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Look dude, while the left has plenty of misogynists they aren’t the ones fueling these movements that often end in terrorism.
My brother is a life long retail worker, his wife works as a teacher at a ritzy school and makes more than him and comes from a “better family”, my bro ain’t exactly an adonis either but they are happier than my sister is with her traditional Christian family. Im just saying man, if you can take care of yourself and provide for yourself, believe in yourself then odds are you can find a woman that lasts. Maybe you won’t that’s always a possibility but it’s not the end of the world either.
You are a different story Lisa. I’ve been doing this too long with you to have any patience left for your sh**You always call me hateful for anything I might say...that’s your standard rebuttal or talking about ‘my black heart’. You‘re trying to bully him like you try to bully me because you can’t stand that we have a different opinion than you and when we don’t change our minds...you start calling names and getting grumpy...its your m.o.
Ok, well again that’s a capitalist problem. If basic needs and security aren’t an issue they won’t have to look for that. If jobs were better and we weren’t being exploited by the capitalist slave masters we could all earn more.Im not disputing that. I am just merely pointing out mating preferences according to biology. Its not the end all be all, but a mans resources to ensure provision and security is a major factor in mate selection with women, especially if they seek to create a family(most of them do).
I doubt that in “hunter gatherer” days people paired up like we have had throughout recorded history up until present times. Society was communal so I have no reason to doubt that love and sex weren’t either. Women did the gathering btw and provides more food for the tribe. Meat was a rarity because hunts weren’t often successful. There’s no reason to believe that prehistoric societies were patriarchal, may have in fact been led by women ( at least in part ) as evidenced by the first personified deities being femalesIf a woman had a choice to partner with a man who made her laugh and that evoked romantic feelings within her as opposed to a hunter and gatherer in tribal days she would choose the hunter gatherer simply to ensure the survival of her and her offspring.
Good. Thanks for admitting it. Lisa seems to think otherwise... as did you earlier.So then nobody here is actually bashing anyone, are they?
i did. I explained to you it isn’t the money, it’s the confidence.Nobody here has still been able to address the data behind why a dating preference would be based off of someones income and social status...
Nobody has been able to address this, but I would still like to know...
Why does data show that income and social status is a considerable and high ranking factor in mate selection with women? Not just in one collection of research findings, but multiple... In men it shows that looks rank high in terms of potential mate factor, but with women income and social status ranks near the top in deciding factors.
There are studies that correlate this to biology and womans innate survival instinct for herself and her offspring. If not that, then what else?