Exposing Mark Phillips

Yellowbunzz tasty

Established
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Messages
415
I believe Cathy O'Brian story, however I don't believe she is free.

1.)Having been watching one of Cathy O'Brians videos previously, I stumbled upon one where she was speaking to the interviewer and told the interviewer that there were other victims who spoke to her and agreed, to which the interviewer asked if they were free and she replied "no". I was confused as to why they didn't help those victims out rather since wasn't that their entire purpose, to expose and help the victims. But it seems more like an expose to fear monger rather then help.

2.) My suspicions were fueled by another interview where Cathy continueously expressed how good Mark was with animals while he was dismissive towards her and began speaking to the interviewer. (will find video)

3.)Another situation was the girl who was adopted into the home by both Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brian. Who turned against her family and claimed to have her tubes tied as a means of not birthing children into a world filled with mind controllers like them while living with Mark and Cathy.


4.)Another factor is the Ushering of New Ageism of the "human spirit" Cathy would normally speak of during her speaches to which she says helped her heal I believe.

5.) Her relationship with Mark Phillips brought me to suspicion as well. I'd think someone whose endured so much sexual abuse and the other party being knowledgeable of this wouldn't engage in sexual activities however it seems in their book "Access Denied" there was a different turn.

This article further proved my suspiciouns and made me rather saddened since Cathy was and still is in mind control.


This is to expose those controlled oppositions such as David Icke as well.
 






Last edited:

Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
I believe Cathy O'Brian story, however I don't believe she is free.

1.)Having been watching one of Cathy O'Brians videos previously, I stumbled upon one where she was speaking to the interviewer and told the interviewer that there were other victims who spoke to her and agreed, to which the interviewer asked if they were free and she replied "no". I was confused as to why they didn't help those victims out rather since wasn't that their entire purpose, to expose and help the victims. But it seems more like an expose to fear monger rather then help.

2.) My suspicions were fueled by another interview where Cathy continueously expressed how good Mark was with animals while he was dismissive towards her and began speaking to the interviewer. (will find video)

3.)Another situation was the girl who was adopted into the home by both Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brian. Who turned against her family and claimed to have her tubes tied as a means of not birthing children into a world filled with mind controllers like them while living with Mark and Cathy.


4.)Another factor is the Ushering of New Ageism of the "human spirit" Cathy would normally speak of during her speaches to which she says helped her heal I believe.

5.) Her relationship with Mark Phillips brought me to suspicion as well. I'd think someone whose endured so much sexual abuse and the other party being knowledgeable of this wouldn't engage in sexual activities however it seems in their book "Access Denied" there was a different turn.

This article further proved my suspiciouns and made me rather saddened since Cathy was and still is in mind control.


This is to expose those controlled oppositions such as David Icke as well.
I believe the whole story of Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips is a farce. You can tell their interviews are scripted and they only want to talk about certain talking points. Whenever Cathy speaks Phillips is there to keep her on script. Everything they talk about can be found in books and articles on the subject. It seems all they do is affirm what's already known. Even the Johnny Gosch case was picked up and hijacked by John DeCamp. All he did was take focus off of Boystown and the priests that were pimping the children, and place it on a lower level fall guy named Larry King. DeCamp studied to be a catholic priest before he entered Vietnam and was friends with Phoenix Program founder William Colby once director of the CIA. After DeCamp wrote the book he visited the Vatican and had private meetings with the pope. DeCamp whitewashed the whole story.
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
If this story is bs, what exactly would they hope to accomplish by going into the amount of detail, exposing names and mind control methodologies, tactics and techniques, not to mention leaving themselves wide open to all kinds of judgement and critisism, only seeing her as this abuse victim. How would it help their cause if there is an alterier motive, outside of plain old exposure to these things?
 






Yellowbunzz tasty

Established
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Messages
415
I believe the whole story of Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips is a farce. You can tell their interviews are scripted and they only want to talk about certain talking points. Whenever Cathy speaks Phillips is there to keep her on script. Everything they talk about can be found in books and articles on the subject. It seems all they do is affirm what's already known. Even the Johnny Gosch case was picked up and hijacked by John DeCamp. All he did was take focus off of Boystown and the priests that were pimping the children, and place it on a lower level fall guy named Larry King. DeCamp studied to be a catholic priest before he entered Vietnam and was friends with Phoenix Program founder William Colby once director of the CIA. After DeCamp wrote the book he visited the Vatican and had private meetings with the pope. DeCamp whitewashed the whole story.
Interesting,,,, however the level of detail she went in makes it seemingly real which I believe however there may have been parts edited out. There has been accusations that she stole the story of Brice Taylor seeing as they both have daughters named Kelley.
 






Yellowbunzz tasty

Established
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Messages
415
If this story is bs, what exactly would they hope to accomplish by going into the amount of detail, exposing names and mind control methodologies, tactics and techniques, not to mention leaving themselves wide open to all kinds of judgement and critisism, only seeing her as this abuse victim. How would it help their cause if there is an alterier motive, outside of plain old exposure to these things?
Did you read the article? If not, read it. I don't believe her story is false, as I wrote it in bold on purpose but I believe she isn't free.

Moving along as mentioned in the article mkultra victims would go to seek help from them in order to regain control of their free will in entirety but Mark Phillips would dismiss clear signs of the mkultra victim and lead them to hospitals to which they would be treated for anything but their shattered personalities as a means of not actually freeing mkultra victims but rather keeping them under control or leaving them to be killed off or kill themselves off.

That would be their gain, to keep them under mind control despite receiving scrutiny. Another thing is the whole David Icke situation to which he called himself Jesus, then went along years after calling people in the government reptiles....... and the people who supported him were Cathy O'Brian and Mark Phillips. Reptiles... thats absurd since their deviating from the actual truth which is demons, their leading people into a New Age facade. Which is also how one individual was also programmed to spread information about New Age which was a false sense of spirituality.
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
If this story is bs, what exactly would they hope to accomplish by going into the amount of detail, exposing names and mind control methodologies, tactics and techniques, not to mention leaving themselves wide open to all kinds of judgement and critisism, only seeing her as this abuse victim. How would it help their cause if there is an alterier motive, outside of plain old exposure to these things?
Cathy and Mark make the conspiracy lecture tour rounds and make quite a bit of money through fees, book sales, and donations.Also you have to consider that they're disinformation agents to muddy the waters. Their stories are wild and out there, which is the reason why people listen to their stories.

They do mention names and methodologies, but everything they claim was already known before they came forward. The names they mention are all men who are dead, and can't defend themselves against the allegations.
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
They do mention names and methodologies, but everything they claim was already known before they came forward. The names they mention are all men who are dead, and can't defend themselves against the allegations.
Thanks for your opinion. I disagree.
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
Cathy and Mark make the conspiracy lecture tour rounds and make quite a bit of money through fees, book sales, and donations.Also you have to consider that they're disinformation agents to muddy the waters. Their stories are wild and out there, which is the reason why people listen to their stories.

They do mention names and methodologies, but everything they claim was already known before they came forward. The names they mention are all men who are dead, and can't defend themselves against the allegations.
They make money through fees and book sales and donations. Oh and to “muddy the waters” By talking shit about people we can’t stand THATS why they did it! Aaaahhh LOL that was funny :D
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
They make money through fees and book sales and donations. Oh and to “muddy the waters” By talking shit about people we can’t stand THATS why they did it! Aaaahhh LOL that was funny :D
That's awesome reasoning!! Its ok for them to make up stuff about people you don't like!! Are you 13?
 






Lizard King

Rookie
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Messages
75
What I don't understand is all the people who are accused of doing this are rich and could afford the most expensive call girls then why would they need to mess around with mkultra people?
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
That's awesome reasoning!! Its ok for them to make up stuff about people you don't like!! Are you 13?
What exactly was your reasoning? I’m honestly trying to understand the root of this belief you’ve arrived at so I can come around and understand possibility from another angle. Not just some blanket statement. An opinion with no clear origin. Without some historical context, it just looks like “yeah that’s because the sky is green and elephants really don’t exist. Everyone knew this though. Yeah that’s the way it is” Ok great.. thanks?
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
What exactly was your reasoning? I’m honestly trying to understand the root of this belief you’ve arrived at so I can come around and understand possibility from another angle. Not just some blanket statement. An opinion with no clear origin. Without some historical context, it just looks like “yeah that’s because the sky is green and elephants really don’t exist. Everyone knew this though. Yeah that’s the way it is” Ok great.. thanks?
My reasoning is based on observation, you know the known facts I stated. Your reasoning is who cares what they say, because the people they're making the accusations about you don't like anyway, so who cares if they're slandered. Cheers!
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
This interview exposes O'Brien and Phillips. The constant change of story, stuttering, and Phillips cutting in to answer questions directed to O'Brien when she navigates away from the script. He exposes them in the last hour of the interview. Revealing interview. I'm sure it won't change the mind of those who never heard a conspiracy they didnt believe though.

 






Lizard King

Rookie
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Messages
75
I noticed Richard Nixon's name is never mentioned with all this stuff. Probably because he was a Quaker and perhaps one of the few presidents that had any morals. Probably why the powers that be set him up with Watergate to get rid of him.
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
I noticed Richard Nixon's name is never mentioned with all this stuff. Probably because he was a Quaker and perhaps one of the few presidents that had any morals. Probably why the powers that be set him up with Watergate to get rid of him.
Nixon was far from innocent. He was the main lawyer for Pepsi Cola before he became president, and also the president during the Vietnam war. During the war years Pepsi Cola had a plant in Vietnam, and essentially got caught shipping drugs in crates with empty Pepsi bottles. Pepsi was used as a way of shipping drugs during those years. Nixon was up to his eyeballs in all that stuff.

Also during the JFK assassination Nixon claimed he was in Dallas at a Pepsi convention. Coincidence maybe, but considering J. Edgar Hoover and many others were in Dallas the night before and the day of is pretty suspicious. Hoover was at a party with oil man Clint Merchison founder of the Dallas Cowboys. Merchison was affiliated with the mob as was all the NFL teams original founders of that time. Hunt with the Chiefs, Debartolo with the 49ers etc were all mob affiliated. The NFL was founded by the mob lol
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
My reasoning is based on observation, you know the known facts I stated. Your reasoning is who cares what they say, because the people they're making the accusations about you don't like anyway, so who cares if they're slandered. Cheers!
Why Don’t you just say “because I said so” at the end of all your stunning observations, bubbabot. Since you can’t cite or present any evidence behind the statements you make to allow other people to understand how you formed your opinion.
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
This interview exposes O'Brien and Phillips. The constant change of story, stuttering, and Phillips cutting in to answer questions directed to O'Brien when she navigates away from the script. He exposes them in the last hour of the interview. Revealing interview. I'm sure it won't change the mind of those who never heard a conspiracy they didnt believe though.

Bra- fucking-Vo. You’re catching on :D
 






Bubbajay

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Messages
844
Observation. Oh I didn’t realize you were there when they were discussing misinformation tactics. What facts are known to you? You talk out of your ass half the time you ever state anything you don’t cite anything that leads you to the conclusions that you spout constantly. Just say “because I said so” at the end of all your stunning observations lol
The fact they use to routinely travel the conspiracy lecture tours trying to sell books, DVDs, they use info already known, and Phillips constantly corrects O'Brien isnt "spouting conclusions", its observation anyone with half a brain can easily pick up. I'm sorry you lack any sense of discernment whatsover. There's been spooks, hucksters, and mentally ill people in the conspiracy community since its inception. You wouldn't know since you obviously take everyone at their word. I've read quite a few of your comments, and not once have I seen you question anything. You're a dunce
 






~JC~

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
823
The fact they use to routinely travel the conspiracy lecture tours trying to sell books, DVDs, they use info already known, and Phillips constantly corrects O'Brien isnt "spouting conclusions", its observation anyone with half a brain can easily pick up. I'm sorry you lack any sense of discernment whatsover. There's been spooks, hucksters, and mentally ill people in the conspiracy community since its inception. You wouldn't know since you obviously take everyone at their word. I've read quite a few of your comments, and not once have I seen you question anything. You're a dunce
You know, I've read the books and I've followed this story, but I'm not arrogant enough to say I KNOW anything definitively. So they do lectures and tour to tell their story - SO WHAT? Everyone's a liar to you and you've made your mind up and that's that. You're not open enough to speculate that anything can possibly be real. Like there isn't a slight possibility that maybe they DO want to help people and this shit really happened.. And how does one go about doing that? sitting at home, farting all over conspiracy forums? The truth is, you have no clue, neither do I. Neither one of us was there (idk were you?) This is why we bounce ideas around until this ACTUAL evidence we can make our minds up about.

Just do me a favor and leave my posts alone because you never offer me anything real to go on except a bunch of your opinions downplaying everything, without constructive context. Just the Bubbajay dictionary with the subtitle "it's common sense"
 






Last edited:
Top