EUROPA: The Last Battle

[Janus]

when i said it "was good enough for me", i was referring to the fact that it was sufficient without the soft music. i havent looked into hitlers life-- i never found it important to do so. i am mainly focused on his deeds and actions rather than his psyche and motivations.

Thought precedes deed. The emphasis on judging people by their deeds is Jewish-Christian and obviously contradicts Jesus' teaching about the heart. If you can't ascertain his motive, then you don't even know why he carried out what he did. History blurs the motive, heaping endless speculations while never arriving at a credible conclusion.

whether something is based on revisionist or mainstream history should not be cause for dismissing the claim. only the facts have any value. i, like any honest revisionist, is only interested in the facts. ill grant you that nationalistic narratives might distort the truth from time to time if youll agree that mainstream history is far from accurate.
i watch these documentaries because its the other side of the coin i have not been taught. somewhere in the middle is the truth.

Are you of the view that history should be absolutized? That the mainstream historians got it wrong and only now are we on the right track? Is history even valid? Why treasure it?

the 100.000 jewish nazis i was referring to were soldiers for nazi germany. the video (and other docs ive watched) have noted that the germans/hitler was quite aware of their jewishness and accepted them into the military. the employed jews were forced to wear the yellow "juden" star of david on their overcoat for easy identification, so they had to disclose their jewishness.
things get complex because while we have 100.000 jewish germans fighting for the reich at the same time weve got jews in the ghettos. the rest of the jews were given money by the government to leave peacefully and settle in palestine.

Yet he says in his private conversations that the few decent Jews in Germany didn't take action on behalf of the national idea. I claimed earlier that most Jews were actually neutral. Like the Arabs, they didn't desire self-responsibility, preferring to leave their affairs to "god".

you have a bunch of good questions here; i dont know. id refer you to a more qualified poster to answer... perhaps thundarian or red sky. i would be interested in the answers myself.

Alright...

why would there not be a proclivity for any ethnic group to be comfortable with the own? its natural and normal. i am not faulting them for it.
american jews of the `30s would undoubtedly side with their community and fellow jews especially considering the lack of facts about the situation trickling down to them. the elite jews/zionists disseminating the news and propaganda would steer them to fall in line. all things considered, i would expect any group to behave similarly.
michael tsarion has said that of all the people, the jews have had it the worst in terms of being fed false info, brainwashing, scapegoating, etc. i tend to agree.

It becomes undesirable if it comes at the expense of the rest of the world. The truly great Jews were the humanists who resisted their Jewishness. These are lost to history.

Undoubtedly their plight is a great one.

by the, janus: you posed a question on the 'american presidents and why?' thread-- i did see that but have not replied yet because i have to review the history again. ive forgotten the key points and only recall the conclusion about FDRs socialism. i apologise for not responding, but i shall.

Alright.

 

[polymoog]

Thought precedes deed. The emphasis on judging people by their deeds is Jewish-Christian and obviously contradicts Jesus' teaching about the heart. If you can't ascertain his motive, then you don't even know why he carried out what he did. History blurs the motive, heaping endless speculations while never arriving at a credible conclusion.

a mans early years is almost like a different lifetime. speaking for myself, ive done and said things that i would never do today. although those events shaped who i am, that younger person is completely unrecognizable. an event in my past could look significant to a biographer writing fifty years later when it really had meant nothing and had no bearing on me. i dont know if that fits all men, but i think it fits the majority. i think it would include hitler.
additionally, many of the books written on hitler are too speculative. i cannot find them to be a good source viewed through slanted psychological profiles looking to find a reason for "hate".
for this reason, i think his intent and motive are best sourced from personal communications, letters, and so on.

Are you of the view that history should be absolutized? That the mainstream historians got it wrong and only now are we on the right track? Is history even valid? Why treasure it?

i wish it could be absolutized, but i dont think it is possible. any historical event has different points of view and countless hows and whys along with it. only through the collected viewpoints can one understand the entire picture.
i believe we are on the right track if we add more viewpoints, especially from the german perspective which has been suppressed, to gain a wider scope of understanding about the war.
as you know, if we dont understand history, we are bound to repeat it.

 

[Janus]

a mans early years is almost like a different lifetime. speaking for myself, ive done and said things that i would never do today. although those events shaped who i am, that younger person is completely unrecognizable. an event in my past could look significant to a biographer writing fifty years later when it really had meant nothing and had no bearing on me. i dont know if that fits all men, but i think it fits the majority. i think it would include hitler.
additionally, many of the books written on hitler are too speculative. i cannot find them to be a good source viewed through slanted psychological profiles looking to find a reason for "hate".
for this reason, i think his intent and motive are best sourced from personal communications, letters, and so on.

It only seems unrecognizable. You are still that youth, despite all the follies. What a man lays down in his youth shapes him for all his life, it's inescapable.

I see.

i wish it could be absolutized, but i dont think it is possible. any historical event has different points of view and countless hows and whys along with it. only through the collected viewpoints can one understand the entire picture.
i believe we are on the right track if we add more viewpoints, especially from the german perspective which has been suppressed, to gain a wider scope of understanding about the war.
as you know, if we dont understand history, we are bound to repeat it.

And that is exactly why revisionism will falter in the long run, although your concession that it's impossible for a complete unbiased history to emerge salvages your stance somewhat.

Simply adding more viewpoints isn't enough. We need a higher synthesis of conflicting views. I said that the great trick of the satanists is that they employed idealists and well-meaning people for their ends. Only the one who has studied FDR, Churchill, Stalin, and Hitler, with detachment and discretion and respect for their views, can arrive at a proper assessment of WW2.

History has not taught anything to mankind. It's all myths and legends. It has neglected ethics and law and enabled moralistic disputes (i.e. over the Holocaust). it must simply be eliminated.

 

[polymoog]

Yes, there are 9 other parts....I would enter in “Europa The Last Battle Part 2” in the search box and it would pull up the video. I did that for all 10 parts.

It’s extremely enlightening if you watch the entire series.

finished part 7. good coverage of the eisenhower death camps and other allied atrocities.

 

[Frank Badfinger]

Has anyone seen this 10 part documentary?

If not, you MUST see it.

It will enlighten you to TRUTH that has been buried, twisted and lied about for over a century.

It keeps getting pulled from YouTube, but it’s also on Vimeo.

Thanks for posting this. I intend to watch it. The series is on Bit Chute as well.

 

[TC1968]

Let me guess. It’s all the Jews fault.

I pretty much figured that would be coming since they had the word ZIONISM in the thumbnail. The 1488 crowd is just infiltrating everything I like lately, and ruining everything they touch.

 

[polymoog]

The 1488 crowd is just infiltrating everything I like lately, and ruining everything they touch.

the 1488 crowd is infiltrated by disinfo agents on many of the comments sections of the internet. the bitchute comments section, in particular, is bad.
ernst zundel, the revisionist historian, was not happy that neonazi skinheads were using his research as recruitment tools, but truth is truth. it MUST come out.

 

[polymoog]

finished part 8. excellent job on the concentration camps.
thats probably the best segment of the documentary so far.