Red Sky at Morning
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2017
- Messages
- 13,961
So many people on the forum think they have it all figured out - how the illuminati work, which events are false flags etc etc.
I know how much I know, and compared to what can be known, it isn't much!
This thread might not be for everyone, and is only really conjecture from me seeing things from a distance... I have kept this to myself for a long while as I like the advice "give many thine ear and few thy tongue". I am not a natural conspiracy theorist as the chance for error is so high!
That having been said, I wonder if anyone saw the full, early version of the economist 2016 cover?
Many details on this have significance. I noticed that in the published version they dropped out the central Chinese building with the interesting figure standing on it. This got me wondering.
Ok this is the strange part...
I woke from a dream a year and a half ago and felt impressed to do a web search on 'Japan 1896', (never had that before!) and found a great natural disaster took place that summer. I then googled to see what major events took place 120 years ago.
There a fair bit to wade through but I picked up on a quite a few events from 1896 that seemed to have resonance for that year...
There was quite a lot, such as the first modern Olympics, end of the American Civil war etc but the one in particular stood out to me.
The figure on the Economist cover looked like a conquistador and I couldn't see any point in it...
I downloaded the new operating system 'El Capitan' a couple of months later without giving it much thought..
Then as I went down the list of events in 1896 I came across the following...
'Apr 20th 1st public film showing in US JohnPhilip Sousa's "El Capitan" premieres in NYC'
I had heard this before. I decided to look it up on Wikipedia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Capitan_(operetta)
The synopsis intrigued me as did the appearance of the man in the Spanish armour.
The important bit - El Capitan Synopsis...
"Don Errico Medigua is the viceroy of Spanish-occupied 16th-century Peru and fears assassination by rebels. After he secretly has the rebel leader El Capitan killed, he disguises himself as El Capitan. Estrelda, the daughter of the former viceroy, Cazzaro, impressed by tales of El Capitan's daring, falls in love with the disguised Medigua, who is already married. Meanwhile, the rebels capture the Lord Chamberlain, Pozzo, mistaking him for the viceroy. Hearing that her husband has been captured, Medigua's wife Marganza and daughter Isabel (who is being wooed by the handsome Verrada) go in search of Medigua.
Medigua, still disguised as El Capitan, leads the hapless rebels against the Spaniards, taking them in circles until they are too tired to fight. The Spaniards win, the mistaken identities are revealed, the love stories are untangled after Medigua explains to his wife the fliration with Estrelda, and the story ends happily."
Given the Economist is owned by the Rothschild's and their tendency to place images for symbolic value I was wondering if a wolf in sheep's clothing might be on the horizon following the pattern of El Capitan...
When I saw that Donald's star had been vandalised outside the El Capitan theatre it started to freak me out...
http://abc7.com/news/donald-trumps-star-on-hollywood-walk-of-fame-vandalized/1573875/
I then noticed that Trump tower had four tiers, just like the building on the Economist cover...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...mp_International_Hotel_and_Tower,_Chicago.jpg
More specifically I wondered if Mr Trump might fit the "controlled opposition" part of the synopsis. His "America First" attitude is very seductive and appealing to a certain sector of American Christians. He speaks his mind, goes in with both feet and doesn't do nuanced!
I believe Trump is possibly leading (and misleading) bringing reproach on Christianity and seducing it's leaders with power, just like El Capitan. I also can't help but wonder if it's "on purpose" as part of the Illuminati agenda to divide, polarise and weaken America.
Now you can call me crazy ;-)
I know how much I know, and compared to what can be known, it isn't much!
This thread might not be for everyone, and is only really conjecture from me seeing things from a distance... I have kept this to myself for a long while as I like the advice "give many thine ear and few thy tongue". I am not a natural conspiracy theorist as the chance for error is so high!
That having been said, I wonder if anyone saw the full, early version of the economist 2016 cover?
Many details on this have significance. I noticed that in the published version they dropped out the central Chinese building with the interesting figure standing on it. This got me wondering.
Ok this is the strange part...
I woke from a dream a year and a half ago and felt impressed to do a web search on 'Japan 1896', (never had that before!) and found a great natural disaster took place that summer. I then googled to see what major events took place 120 years ago.
There a fair bit to wade through but I picked up on a quite a few events from 1896 that seemed to have resonance for that year...
There was quite a lot, such as the first modern Olympics, end of the American Civil war etc but the one in particular stood out to me.
The figure on the Economist cover looked like a conquistador and I couldn't see any point in it...
I downloaded the new operating system 'El Capitan' a couple of months later without giving it much thought..
Then as I went down the list of events in 1896 I came across the following...
'Apr 20th 1st public film showing in US JohnPhilip Sousa's "El Capitan" premieres in NYC'
I had heard this before. I decided to look it up on Wikipedia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Capitan_(operetta)
The synopsis intrigued me as did the appearance of the man in the Spanish armour.
The important bit - El Capitan Synopsis...
"Don Errico Medigua is the viceroy of Spanish-occupied 16th-century Peru and fears assassination by rebels. After he secretly has the rebel leader El Capitan killed, he disguises himself as El Capitan. Estrelda, the daughter of the former viceroy, Cazzaro, impressed by tales of El Capitan's daring, falls in love with the disguised Medigua, who is already married. Meanwhile, the rebels capture the Lord Chamberlain, Pozzo, mistaking him for the viceroy. Hearing that her husband has been captured, Medigua's wife Marganza and daughter Isabel (who is being wooed by the handsome Verrada) go in search of Medigua.
Medigua, still disguised as El Capitan, leads the hapless rebels against the Spaniards, taking them in circles until they are too tired to fight. The Spaniards win, the mistaken identities are revealed, the love stories are untangled after Medigua explains to his wife the fliration with Estrelda, and the story ends happily."
Given the Economist is owned by the Rothschild's and their tendency to place images for symbolic value I was wondering if a wolf in sheep's clothing might be on the horizon following the pattern of El Capitan...
When I saw that Donald's star had been vandalised outside the El Capitan theatre it started to freak me out...
http://abc7.com/news/donald-trumps-star-on-hollywood-walk-of-fame-vandalized/1573875/
I then noticed that Trump tower had four tiers, just like the building on the Economist cover...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...mp_International_Hotel_and_Tower,_Chicago.jpg
More specifically I wondered if Mr Trump might fit the "controlled opposition" part of the synopsis. His "America First" attitude is very seductive and appealing to a certain sector of American Christians. He speaks his mind, goes in with both feet and doesn't do nuanced!
I believe Trump is possibly leading (and misleading) bringing reproach on Christianity and seducing it's leaders with power, just like El Capitan. I also can't help but wonder if it's "on purpose" as part of the Illuminati agenda to divide, polarise and weaken America.
Now you can call me crazy ;-)