- Mar 13, 2017
You can break it down all you like..I think your breakdown is wrong and has it’s own agenda..but I won’t be deceived into thinking that the Jews aren’t really in their land, the land that God gave to them, the land they presently find themselves back in again after how long? That’s a miracle in itself!Hi Lisa let me explain again.
If your argument is that the lineage of the Semitic people have a right to the land of Israel, regardless of their religion, because most Israelis you are arguing for are atheists, then that very argument in fact justifies the Palestinians and the Syrians right to live on that land, even though they're muslim now. Just like you thought Ashkenazis should live there even though theyre atheists now.
This is because the Palestinians and Syrians are racial, blood, descendents of Abraham. The Ashkenazi are Europeans. Someone with 100% Ashkenazi DNA never had an ancestor who lived in Israel. They are not descendents of Shem, therefore are not "Shemitic", descended from the son of Noah named Shem. They are descended from Japhet, so they are "Japhetic".
So again, your argument that the right to the Israeli land belongs to the this particular bloodline regardless of their reglion, means you are in fact in favor of the Palestinian arabs living on that land. That is as far as your argument goes. Do you understand?
Ill break it down again
You say - land belongs to descendents of abraham
descendents of abraham are Palestinian
Ashkenazi Atheists are European. 0% descended from Judah
Therefore you are arguing that the group currently known as "Jews" do not have a right to the land.
You can try another argument but this one does not work, given the Biblical passages and DNA and historical evidence available.