110 A psalm of David.
YHWH said to Adonay,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.”
Matthew 22 41 While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42 saying, “What do you think about the Christ? Whose Son is He?”
They said to Him, “The Son of David.”
43 He said to them, “How then does David in the Spirit call Him ‘Lord,’ saying:
44 ‘The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool” ’?
45 If David then calls Him ‘Lord,’ how is He his Son?” 46 And no one was able to answer Him a word, nor from that day on did anyone dare question Him anymore.
The reason Adonay is called Son and YHWH is called Father is because Adonay was the one who was born on earth.
So are you going to redefine what the word "born" means too? The reason that Prince Michael/Christ is referred to as the firstborn son is because He was the first spirit-Being that God brought into existence.
FIRSTBORN – one is “born” when they are brought into existence. The firstborn is a term used to define the child who is born first to a family. In Scripture, the firstborn receives both the birthright and the blessing (it is God Who decides who the firstborn is), unless the firstborn does something to lose that right, e.g. Esau, who sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of red soup (Edom).
Colossians 1:12-15
1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, Which hath made us meet to be sharers of the inheritance of the holy people in Light:
1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into The Kingdom of His dear Son:
1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:
1:15 Who is the
image of the
invisible God,
the firstborn of every creature:
IMAGE – an image,
by definition, is a
LIKENESS of something and
NOT the original. For someone to be made in the
image of God means they were
created in His
LIKENESS (
Genesis 1:27); it could not possibly mean that they are God (
THE Creator). It is noteworthy that in Hebrew the name Michael literally means: “Who is LIKE God.” (see
Daniel 10:21,
12:1,
Revelation 5:1-5,
12:7-9).
INVISIBLE – the term “invisible” quite clearly means that which is
NOT VISIBLE. It is
impossible to be both visible and invisible at the same time. Again, directly out of the mouth of Jesus, we were told we have
NEVER seen Father's shape nor heard His voice.
John 5:37
And the Father Himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His shape.
Jesus was obviously
VISIBLE.
God is obviously
INVISIBLE, by definition.
It should therefore be
obvious that Jesus cannot possibly be God,
by definition.
CREATURE – a creature is a
CREATION, i.e. something that was
CREATED,
by definition. It is impossible to be created (all of God's Creation was created by God) and be uncreated at the same time. Only God (Father) is uncreated, which is why He is referred to as the “Self-Existing
ONE”; the “I AM”; The
MOST High; and
THE Creator of
ALL things.
Naturally there are other references to Prince Michael/Christ being the firstborn of
MANY brethren, i.e. the first to be created by Father (God).
Romans 8:29 For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate [to be] conformed to the image of His Son, that he might be
the firstborn among MANY brethren.
Does anyone actually believe that God has many brethren? Of course not! But Christ, the firstborn of the
MANY sons of God, does.
Revelation 3:14
And unto the angel of the community of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the beginning of the creation of God;
Please learn to think about what you're actually reading, rather than reading into the text what you are mistakenly thinking.
P.S. What is your answer to the question asked of the scribes/lawyers and pharisees/politicians that Christ, through the mouth of Jesus, in Matthew 22:45? Do you have any idea how to answer that question? Or are you, like the
spiritually blind scribes/lawyers and pharisees/politicians unable to "see" the simple and obvious answer to that question?
