It's just that on one hand you wanted to use OJ's crimes against him but now want to ignore Goldmans. It's more likely that his death was tied to those of his associated than him simply dying in a moments fit of rage and then SEVERAL of his associates die randomly around a similar time in mysterious ways.
I just believe OJ had more of an incentive to murder both his wife and Goldman. A drug dealer would've just stabbed him and tried to catch him slipping alone. It was a passionate kill, the scene and blows were just too much for it to be a drug dealer but this is my stance based on my interpretation of the evidence
I think to convict someone of taking the life of another you do need concrete evidence. And him not reacting in a way we'd want, expect or accept is not concrete evidence that he committed a crime. Nor is him running away from cops who thought he murdered someone concrete evidence. Coupled with the shaky things from the investigation(missing blood from evidence, glove didn't fit/didn't have lacerations that matched OJ's, openly racist investigator, blood being placed not splattered on the scene etc..) than those are the only things you're basing him doing it on. Unless there's other evidence I'm missing. Anyways It is what is.
But you accept that it's odd? This guy just seemed to relaxed about the murder of his wife. And why write a book about it! This guy was a nutcase I literally believe he either did it or was heavily involved in the crime.
QUOTE]
