Lizard King
Star
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2021
- Messages
- 2,471
All those photos explained on Incredibly Average you tube channel.Some of these pictures are the exact same but photoshopped or filtered.
Close up of her injuries.
All those photos explained on Incredibly Average you tube channel.Some of these pictures are the exact same but photoshopped or filtered.
Close up of her injuries.
I did. I don't believe Amber. That was an aggressive move by him though. I didn't think it was funny that she was scared. Just because she is lying doesn't mean he is an angel.That screenshot is totally bogus. If anyone is guilty of anything it's the court bailiffs for not doing their job right. BTW Depp is legally blind in one eye. The last person he wants to get close to is her. Her frightened look of horror is laughable. The bottle incident was a new low even for her. There is no medical evidence of anything she is claiming. She stayed around for the cash and when she didn't get it made up the phony assault charges with her lesbian and transgender friends. Do some research on iotillet or better yet watch the you tube channels I recommended.
Just to clarify in regards to the OP: I think both JD and AH are nutjobs knee deep in shady stuff, so I'm not really for either side. I just wanted to try to present a reasonable argument against condemning people based on a floor pattern.
I'm not glad if she is actually scared but it was the bailiffs fault for allowing it to happen. I saw it live when it happened and why would Depp do that in front of the court? I agree Depp is pretty weird but innocent of these charges. Until this whole Amber Heard thing I never paid attention to Depp. I have only seen about 5 Depp movies. The Alice in Wonderland movie he made a few years ago was so bad I quit watching it. I also don't like the way he looks because I hate tattoos and he also always looks kind of dirty. I'm only standing up for him because I always root for the underdog and honestly feel he is and has been railroaded.I did. I don't believe Amber. That was an aggressive move by him though. I didn't think it was funny that she was scared. Just because she is lying doesn't mean he is an angel.
What this got to do with Billie Eilish? And what does " caping " for Depp mean?Is this turning into the Bilie Eilish thread on repeat? Its weird to see people here caping for Depp after he has been so thoroughly exposed as a very heavy, very dark player among these agendas... hes a very important tool for his masters. But it seems some people have an affinity for him from childhood, are so smitten by his looks or simply enjoy his films to the point that they are here making excuses for him. Its especially strange to see his accuser being attacked with fanciful, wishful speculation... how convenient if your goal is to attempt defending the indefensible.
Post all the one eye pictures you want lol. All it proves is he went along with the publicity. I'll go along with maybe he is a pawn for the industry but why hate the pawn? This is set up by Amber and the MSM, Washington Post, ACLU and the usual suspects.
Imho,I kind of feel like you are purposely missing the point in order to push your rather narrow view. Freemasons didn't invent the checkerboard pattern. It's a very simple pattern that's been in use on pottery, textiles, artwork, and architectural design for thousand of years in many different areas of the world. Freemasons simply used it for their purposes much later in history. That does not make the checkerboard pattern itself evil. Do you understand the difference?
Do all rainbows now belong to LGBTQ+ because they decided to use it to represent themselves? Are all red shoes evil? Are crosses bad because satanists wear them? The obvious and reasonable answer is no.
Ah yes, the old “set up the person seen at the murder scene covered in mud who was in a mental hospital that year where he said he was possessed by a demon and tried to drink people’s blood, who’s child hood room is cover in skulls from dogs he killed and the murder weapon was found behind his house and his friend confessed officially 6 different times”.I just read a bunch of stuff about the West Memphis 3. Sounds like to me the police botched the investigation from the beginning and went after these three guys just because they were too incompetent to find the real killer. They were perfect patsies and one of them was retarded and echols just said things to make people mad. After reading what I have I say Depp was right to help them and the 3 guys got railroaded into 18 years in prison because of shoddy police work. Because they couldn't find the real killer they set these three guys up because nobody liked them and they wanted everyone to think they had solved the crime which they didn't and still haven't. Not only that they had to take an Alford plea which prevents them from suing the crooked police department and prosecutor who framed them. I say Depp helped people that were falsely accused of something because he is a kind good hearted person. Nice try folks but you only made me feel that I am right and Depp is being falsely accused more than I already did. Now I feel he is a champion for the falsely accused and actually a heroic figure. Let's also not forget he has dressed up as Captain Jack Sparrow to cheer up little children in hospitals and also helped helped distribute hearing aids to elderly people who couldn't afford them. I still don't buy he is a satanist. So now someone has checkerboard floor they are guilty of something? LOL.
This thread is becoming reminiscent of the Billie Eilish one where there were several posters refusing to accept evidence and information (going so far as to ignore articles posted by the site owner themself) or admit the obvious... they just kept compromising their own credibility, making ridiculous excuses and attempting unsuccessful distractions/misdirection. Same here. People are ignoring the well documented (problematic to say the least) aspects of Depp's personal and professional history and continuing to present these severely deficient distraction arguments in his defense.What this got to do with Billie Eilish? And what does " caping " for Depp mean?
I said that. If you think checkerboards are just a pattern to be ignored look into Freemason symbolism. I think the website Vigilant Citizen has some stuff about it.And yet the comment was made: "Checkerboard = Freemason", which assumes all usage of checkerboard patterns can never be anything other than masonic. That's a wide-sweeping judgment and condemnation with no basis in reality.
The symbols they use in their photos are always suspect. Consider how much the media is focusing on this compared to other things.Do you know without a doubt the checkerboard pattern seen in the AH photo post #122 is being used as a masonic symbol?
Yes or no?
If yes, you are welcome to provide evidence. If no, why even argue and make that particular photo a thing? Maybe focus on things that actually matter?
I think you jumped to conclusions. You read a lot into that one post that wasn't there. You are the one jumping up and down assuming things that weren't said.And I would call it foolish and ignorant to leave logic and reason at the door while running wild with rumors and false accusations.
There's a huge difference between valid questioning and jumping to invalid conclusions. It makes some threads look like a hysterical 17th c. witch hunt rather than an investigative and rational discussion. Focusing on verifiable facts would be much more helpful.
Checkerboards = FreemasonCan't believe I even have to say this. AH and JD are guilty of many things, but unless proven otherwise - the floor is just a floor and not part of satan's evil interior decoration plan.
And yet the comment was made: "Checkerboard = Freemason", which assumes all usage of checkerboard patterns can never be anything other than masonic. That's a wide-sweeping judgment and condemnation with no basis in reality.
It's all about context, and in this case it's highly likely that the checkered floor in the photo was included for a reason. Do I know that as absolute fact, of course not. But to say it has no basis in reality is ludicrous.Do you know without a doubt the checkerboard pattern seen in the AH photo post #122 is being used as a masonic symbol?
Yes or no?
If yes, you are welcome to provide evidence. If no, why even argue and make that particular photo a thing? Maybe focus on things that actually matter?
I am doing no such thing. Johnny's words, actions, connections and symbolic hand signs tell us what he's about. Hell, his tattoos read like an open book. He's not hiding anything. It's all out there for those that can see.And I would call it foolish and ignorant to leave logic and reason at the door while running wild with rumors and false accusations.
Simple fact, though: "Checkerboard = Freemason" is false and has no basis in reality, so I will double down on that. It is ONLY true when the pattern is purposefully being used as a nefarious symbol. Questioning an assumption that cannot be proven isn't really ludicrous at all.
..
..
..
I hope you know that there is no actual statute, anywhere in the criminal justice code that uses that phrase. At least, anywhere in the United States.Because innocent until proven guilty is still the right thing, period. And that really is the bigger point.
What I am really wanting to impart here is that even if we go by "innocent until proven guilty" still this specific stand/position doesn't automatically proves that AH image/picture isn't subtly shoving nefarious motive and utilising gullible human en-masse subconscious energies, akin the masonic doctrine does.Let me know if you'd rather I -
A. Assume you are guilty of something without hard evidence, or
B. Give you the benefit of the doubt and properly investigate before coming to a judgment.
I will leave that up to you.
They can go ahead and judge without evidence, but I guarantee that type of false judgment will eventually be used against them someday.
Asking me personally? Are you ready for the reply?So, yeah... A or B?
Wager that, all them Me Too! victims might'av thought the same.PS: The wink is a mere construct of a humanistic society bent on conversing through pixels gathered together to form thought through image - an artistic expression of one's own consciousness as well as a subconscious means of embracing non face-to-face forms of dialogue and communication, if you will. It is only dangerous in the context of one's personal interpretation of the wink, and therefore could easily be misconstrued as the result of your own cognitive dissonance, perhaps. In that case, is the wink truly an existential threat if the danger resides in your consciousness alone, or does your consciousness spill out of its void and alter the very fabric of the universe and every being within it. Let us ponder.
I think it was Hunter Thompson that was talking about adrenochrome in one of his books. I never liked him. He was an arrogant pompous ass.But Sire, AH demonising and manipulating JD will not eradicate JD's personal involvement with adrenochrome, will it?
[Infact, at one point MSM and alternative media both even disclosed that JD is a distant cousin of brit's current monarch! Let that sink in too!]
The point is not that, if one is appearing to be a manipulating individual (i.e. AH) then the other (i.e. JD) automatically becomes a saint. No.
Imho, both are greedy demon, equally, individually.
Most (if not all) of users here will concur to this (I suppose).
Anyone wondering why there are so many movies pumped out by marvel and DC comics now? I don't trust either of them and they have agendas.This thread is becoming reminiscent of the Billie Eilish one where there were several posters refusing to accept evidence and information (going so far as to ignore articles posted by the site owner themself) or admit the obvious... they just kept compromising their own credibility, making ridiculous excuses and attempting unsuccessful distractions/misdirection. Same here. People are ignoring the well documented (problematic to say the least) aspects of Depp's personal and professional history and continuing to present these severely deficient distraction arguments in his defense.
Therefore, they are "caping" for Depp by throwing on their Superman togs and rushing to his defense.
Yep he does it's fear and loathing Lizard KingI think it was Hunter Thompson that was talking about adrenochrome in one of his books. I never liked him. He was an arrogant pompous ass.