Cuties?

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,329
Yes, please watch the movie before saying "I bet most of the people attacking Cuties haven't seen it". :rolleyes:

Actually, consider watching these clips before giving them a view on Netflix.



I'm not sure what societal commentary mandates a young child finding a used condom on the floor and blowing it like a balloon, a scene where little girls use sexual collateral to get out of trouble with grown men, and little girls spanking each other while they shake their asses.

My issue with TYT here is that they denounce people who attempt to make Cuties outrage political...all while making it political.

They're so disingenuous with their reporting. Practically none of their video has anything to do with their actual opinion on Cuties. In fact, I'm positive they have no opinion on it, and like you, project their inaction of watching it onto their political opponents.

I don't think they'll ever actually watch it, because they're not looking to have a real discourse about it. Had Republicans adored the movie, they would have hated it. That's their political stance.

By the way, I'm a registered Democrat and have voted accordingly.

The Trump stuff you're spewing here has no relevance because it's not just Republicans who are pissed at the child exploitation.
Some things are just morally outrageous and shouldn’t be politicized. It’s really a sad time when people don’t know the difference.
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,060
Some things are just morally outrageous and shouldn’t be politicized. It’s really a sad time when people don’t know the difference.
most conservatives dont give a rats ass about p***philia, just like they dont give a rats ass about "freedom" "small government" "pro life" "christianity" "anti-war"

They just care when they can use these things as an attack on their political enemies.

If you truly cared about p***philia, you would despise Donald Trump.

Thats why Q Tards are a joke.
 






Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,329
most conservatives dont give a rats ass about p***philia, just like they dont give a rats ass about "freedom" "small government" "pro life" "christianity" "anti-war"

They just care when they can use these things as an attack on their political enemies.

If you truly cared about p***philia, you would despise Donald Trump.

Thats why Q Tards are a joke.
Just another thing the left can’t prove about trump...You’d think you guys would give it up by now...its old and its tiring and I don’t think its working like you guys think because can you say #landslide in November?

I think moral people care about p***philia, homosexuality, transgenderism, abortion etc...
They care more about freedom..not wanting a big government to rule over them. I can’t speak to anti-war..some Christians think that being a patriot is part of their Christian faith and military might or defending the right to guns is a good thing. However..if no one defends the right in this country to have guns..they would take it and people will be unarmed and easier to control..which is why the founding fathers wanted people to legally have guns. I can see where that’s kept us free.

What’s wrong with Christianity other than you don’t want to be a Christian?
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,407
Leftists for years: SLUTWALK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ABRAHAMIC MORALS MUST BE DESTROYED!!!!
Leftists when child porn movie comes out: They are commenting about the lack of traditional morals in society

The hypocracy does not go unnoticed. Neither does the obvious malintent
 






Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,056
If "Cuties" is causing people to have a conversation about exploitation, they wouldn't typically have. Then the movie achieved a purpose, which I believe was the director's stated goal. Now, I get that it's an uncomfortable conversation for people to have. That level of discomfort is why the problem doesn't get solved, though.

You may not like the methodology, but sometimes people need to get shocked. Ultimately, I see the people playing part-time social justice warrior coming up short here. People are more worried about the movie than the reality where far worse happens to children every day.

In essence, people are attacking "Cuties" because it seems like an easy target. Now maybe canceling the movie does save some kids, but by aiming small, you're still letting the biggest offenders roam free. Maybe even enabling them through poor strategy.
 






Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,329
If "Cuties" is causing people to have a conversation about exploitation, they wouldn't typically have. Then the movie achieved a purpose, which I believe was the director's stated goal. Now, I get that it's an uncomfortable conversation for people to have. That level of discomfort is why the problem doesn't get solved, though.

You may not like the methodology, but sometimes people need to get shocked. Ultimately, I see the people playing part-time social justice warrior coming up short here. People are more worried about the movie than the reality where far worse happens to children every day.

In essence, people are attacking "Cuties" because it seems like an easy target. Now maybe canceling the movie does save some kids, but by aiming small, you're still letting the biggest offenders roam free. Maybe even enabling them through poor strategy.
There’s having a conversation and then there’s exploiting girls to have that conversation. No one should exploit girls to have a conversation that the left don’t want to have anyway...they just want to lecture...or they make it into something it wasn’t just like every other conversation. It’s hard to win against the left..they keep going and never stop on the perversions they want to unleash against the world.

 






Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,056
There’s having a conversation and then there’s exploiting girls to have that conversation. No one should exploit girls to have a conversation that the left don’t want to have anyway...they just want to lecture...or they make it into something it wasn’t just like every other conversation. It’s hard to win against the left..they keep going and never stop on the perversions they want to unleash against the world.

You're missing the point that *nobody* will have that conversation in a vacuum. People aren't going to wake up one morning and all decide "hey, lets finally solve child exploitation". We have to shock them into speaking up.

How is Pelosi relevant here? That's like the weirdest pivot ever.
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,407
If "Cuties" is causing people to have a conversation about exploitation, they wouldn't typically have. Then the movie achieved a purpose, which I believe was the director's stated goal. Now, I get that it's an uncomfortable conversation for people to have. That level of discomfort is why the problem doesn't get solved, though.

You may not like the methodology, but sometimes people need to get shocked. Ultimately, I see the people playing part-time social justice warrior coming up short here. People are more worried about the movie than the reality where far worse happens to children every day.

In essence, people are attacking "Cuties" because it seems like an easy target. Now maybe canceling the movie does save some kids, but by aiming small, you're still letting the biggest offenders roam free. Maybe even enabling them through poor strategy.
-Exploit children to get people to have a conversation about exploiting children
Yeah I don't think thats how it works
 






Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
515
Crimes against children run deeper than "Cuties", that is certain. Maybe they should make films that depict those crimes, also?
(Hmm...not sure how "popular" or "trending" those would be, though..not *shudder* "sexy" *shudder* enough)
If anything whether you support this film or despise it, it definitely has gained traction in the public's mind.
Obviously, I find it disturbing, to say the least. I have not watched it, nor will I, but between watching the trailer, reading reviews, and my gut instinct about it, I'm not interested in whatever message this "film" is trying to share.
Parents should monitor what their children are exposed to and/or their extracurricular activities, also.
I understand there is a need for childhood self exploration, but not at the expense of safety.
Total exploitation of children in this "film" under the guise of female empowerment.
Just read the VC article, spot on.

ETA: I read that the film ends where the girl returns to her "roots", but seriously you had to show the rest of the creepy stuff? You could have tastefully implied all that, minus all the gross body shots.
 






Last edited:
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,060
i have no problem with a movie commenting on the over sexualization of women, especially young women because that is a REALITY. If the film seeks to bring attention to this horrible part of our society in order to bring about change. Then good. At this point we can all speculate about the films intentions.

From the clips it does seem over gratuitous and that is not really needed to make a social commentary, it does seem over the top, but again I have not seen the movie, and I dont think I can fully comment until I do.

what is not debatable is how this whole #cancelnetflix movement is being steered by the usual suspects to attack their political enemies and spin the whole bullshit narrative about Communists trying to destroy society so give us the Totalitarian Fascist savior.
 






Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,329
You're missing the point that *nobody* will have that conversation in a vacuum. People aren't going to wake up one morning and all decide "hey, lets finally solve child exploitation". We have to shock them into speaking up.

How is Pelosi relevant here? That's like the weirdest pivot ever.
I think people could wake up one morning and say..we are going to really solve this problem..well everyone except the left who likes problems that never get solved....ahem...anyway...you don’t need to make a show exploiting young girls..ever!

She talks about how they work their agenda in the press...by demonization. That’s what they are setting up with this show..wrong will be right in their eyes and if you don’t believe that then you’re whatever word they come up with. So...it will be your fault not the fault of the people that made this show in the first place..that exploited young girls for an agenda...so pelosi in fact talking about the evil they do is relevant.
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,407
i have no problem with a movie commenting on the over sexualization of women, especially young women because that is a REALITY. If the film seeks to bring attention to this horrible part of our society in order to bring about change. Then good. At this point we can all speculate about the films intentions.

From the clips it does seem over gratuitous and that is not really needed to make a social commentary, it does seem over the top, but again I have not seen the movie, and I dont think I can fully comment until I do.

what is not debatable is how this whole #cancelnetflix movement is being steered by the usual suspects to attack their political enemies and spin the whole bullshit narrative about Communists trying to destroy society so give us the Totalitarian Fascist savior.
Imagine caring about Netflix this much. Literal garbage machine produced by the Obama’s and made by the nephew of the inventor of western propoganda. And everything on it is bad

“Noooo don’t hurt netflix plzzzzzzz”
Classic take from our resident communist
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,407
Breaking news from leftist hyper geniuses. Netflix, the social propoganda platform which oversexualizrs 90% of its content is taking a bold stand against over sexualization by showing their second feature sexualizing 11 year olds, the first being “big mouth”. Stunning and brave! Traditional values incoming, thank you Netflix
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,060
Imagine caring about Netflix this much. Literal garbage machine produced by the Obama’s and made by the nephew of the inventor of western propoganda. And everything on it is bad

“Noooo don’t hurt netflix plzzzzzzz”
Classic take from our resident communist
I dont care about Netflix, I just dont subscribe to your fake outrage, neither will I be manipulated EMOTIONALLY by Fascists. they dont give a fuck about children, what don't you get about that ?

where is #cancelthepresident movement by those who care so much about the children ? You know Jeffrey Epstein's co-pedo-rapist.

You just can't see how you are being played like a fiddle ?
 






  • Love
Reactions: 000
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,407
I dont care about Netflix, I just dont subscribe to your fake outrage, neither will I be manipulated EMOTIONALLY by Fascists. they dont give a fuck about children, what don't you get about that ?

where is #cancelthepresident movement by those who care so much about the children ? You know Jeffrey Epstein's co-pedo-rapist.

You just can't see how you are being played like a fiddle ?
>where is all these totally unrelated things

keep apologizing for pedophelia normalization, black lives matter antifa supporter, everyone can see you
 






Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
515
Whether we love or hate Netflix is almost irrelevant.
The "film" is inappropriate.
Even if supposedly the directors intent was to inform the public about the origins of child exploitation and the effects it has on a child's mind...that message was camouflaged/obscured by the overwhelmingly vulgar content.
Encouraging seductive dancing in children sends the message that displaying your body in ways that historically has been observed by strippers, prostitutes, and barflies (all the while totally degrading the sanctity of childhood and innocence) is something that should he accepted and rewarded by society??
These behaviors forces these children to act in ways that are debasing, humiliating, and undignified (also not to mention their lack of self-awareness and comprehension of the f/act) for the attention of adult men who only see them as objects to fulfill their sick and twisted perverse fantasies.
Good job! Way to go, Netflix!
Totally empowering girls to respect themselves and their bodies!! Ha!!!
Before "Cuties" appeared on their site/station/channel, I was losing interest with their content, anyhow.
For the last half-decade they've lost contracts with most the decent movies or shows, only to be replaced by increasingly dark, angry, and biased ("original") content.
Been a subscriber since the aughts and that place has changed a ton since that timeline.
Haven't been a steady viewer since the last season of Black Mirror was released, but that show has also, jumped the shark.
Perhaps that's what "Cuties" did for many subscribers.
 






Last edited:

Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,056
I think people could wake up one morning and say..we are going to really solve this problem..well everyone except the left who likes problems that never get solved....ahem...anyway...you don’t need to make a show exploiting young girls..ever!

She talks about how they work their agenda in the press...by demonization. That’s what they are setting up with this show..wrong will be right in their eyes and if you don’t believe that then you’re whatever word they come up with. So...it will be your fault not the fault of the people that made this show in the first place..that exploited young girls for an agenda...so pelosi in fact talking about the evil they do is relevant.
Oh please. You types need Laura Loomer to get banned on twitter before you think censorship is a problem. You didn't wake up one day, and decide that cancel culture is bad. You had to be shook into it by some scandalous story.
 






Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,329
Oh please. You types need Laura Loomer to get banned on twitter before you think censorship is a problem. You didn't wake up one day, and decide that cancel culture is bad. You had to be shook into it by some scandalous story.
Context is the issue with you...you always have false equivalencies.
 






Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,056
Context is the issue with you...you always have false equivalencies.
LMAO, what false equivalency? I clearly stated my position, then gave you an example. Not once did I imply equivalence. Moreover, the point of my comparison was to show a pattern. That pattern being, that people need to get shocked to be motivated.
 






Top