@Frank Badfinger - hey, if you wouldn’t mind, I’m having trouble making sense of the AIDS-HIV controversy. What’s the significance of HIV not being the cause of Aids? Is Aids a complete fabrication? If so what did people get sick and die from? I figured there are money grab and fear mongering components to all of it, but if you could briefly fill in the gaps for me I’d appreciate it. I couldn’t cut through the info I reviewed to come to a reasonable understanding. Thanks bro!
HIV does not cause AIDS.... The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers. —
Peter Duesberg
Like CV-BS, HIV has never been isolated. It was invented by witch-doctor Robert Gallo, so he could make millions from his patented test procedure to find the non-existent virus, based solely on detecting the presence of antibodies. Sound familiar?
“AIDS” stands for acquired immune deficiency
syndrome. A “syndrome" is a collection of symptoms
thought to be caused by a single issue, e.g. a “virus”. In other words, it's a fancy medical term for saying “we don't know what's causing these problems, but this is what we're going to blame for it so we can make a fortune from poisoning you with the treatments”.
None of the symptoms observed, that were later repackaged as “AIDS”, were new.
There is zero evidence of any kind that the non-existent HIV causes the basket of symptoms that have been rebranded as AIDS. So yes, AIDS is a complete fabrication. “AIDS” is
NOT contagious, nor is it sexually transmitted, nor is there any reliable test for it.
Along with making Gallo millions, it also made millions for the makers of the extremely toxic drug AZT, which killed millions. It was the AZT that killed them,
NOT “HIV-AIDS”.
Drugs and “chemotherapy” are successfully sold to people as “cures”, because they provide the
illusion of success/relief, if they aren't immediately lethal. The body's natural immune reaction kicks into high gear once it's been exposed to a poison, e.g. a pharmaceutical drug. This causes a temporary, short-term feeling of improvement in the patient's condition. However, after a few weeks, the body's defenses are subdued by the poisonous drug. From that point forward the patient's condition deteriorates, which is then blamed on the imaginary virus rather than on the real culprit: the toxic drug (in this case AZT).
The reason this is extremely significant now, is because history is repeating itself.
Gallo worked for Fauci in the early 80s when all of this was going on, and Fauci is still at the epicenter of this CV-BS fraud, which has absolutely nothing to do with viruses, diseases, public health or pandemics;
it's a bank heist, designed to destroy the economy, bankrupt small businesses, wipe out the middle class, and loot their retirement funds and personal assets, etc. That way the global parasitic criminal class can buy back the small businesses for pennies on the dollar, and put those who survive in a position where they are completely dependent upon the evil system for (the illusion of) survival.
That is what will make it possible to achieve the >90% reduction in the population t.h.e.y. have been talking about, through wars and vaccines, the latter of which will be the first ever RNA vaccine.