COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

Lil axe

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
901
I'm not sure what you mean by the smartest people. If you mean more educated, its my opinion they're that much more brainwashed, sadly.

Those complaining of us being compliant in spreading the disease, being killers, were a combination of morons and shills. It all kinda went out the window when the mask packaging started to say stuff along the lines of 'This will not prevent the spread or risk of being infected with CV, corona, cold, flu, etc'

If you're not caught up yet it will probably be a wild 60 pages
i noticed that too on packaging, and websites, disclaimers about the non effectiveness of the masks, i started thinking they were covering their butts against lawsuits
 

Helioform

Star
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
3,195
I agree that "sustainable development" and the other goals of the elite should be resisted in every way, but the poster has his terminology wrong: the elitists of the World Bank, WHO, WEF, etc. aren't Marxists. Do we think they'll be giving up their billions to join a unified class that own the industries we work in? They want a technocracy, a techno-fascist dictatorship, with other nations' protected land as backing for their infinite wealth.

Frank last week you labeled Trudeau a communist- that description is incorrect as well. His father may have been a member of the communist party but JT is no communist. In no way do these people want to break down the limbs of empire... military, multinational corporations, or billionaire tech giants. More correct terms for them would be social democrats, fabian socialists (Tony Blair), or neoliberals.

Small things and I don't mean to derail the thread but if researchers use misleading terminology it's automatically a hurdle to exposing the full truth.
Rather amusing that you do not want to recognize that the NWO is communism. Communism on steroids. Perhaps this would force you to re-evaluate the ideologies you associate yourself with.

And if the NWO is not communism then why is Schwab calling for more Marxism to be incorporated into the system in the "Great Reset"?


It starts out with "more Marxism" then it ends with the abolition of private property and the installment of gulags on a worldwide scale make no mistake about it.
 

chrisocn

Established
Joined
Aug 21, 2017
Messages
137
I agree that "sustainable development" and the other goals of the elite should be resisted in every way, but the poster has his terminology wrong: the elitists of the World Bank, WHO, WEF, etc. aren't Marxists. Do we think they'll be giving up their billions to join a unified class that own the industries we work in? They want a technocracy, a techno-fascist dictatorship, with other nations' protected land as backing for their infinite wealth.

Frank last week you labeled Trudeau a communist- that description is incorrect as well. His father may have been a member of the communist party but JT is no communist. In no way do these people want to break down the limbs of empire... military, multinational corporations, or billionaire tech giants. More correct terms for them would be social democrats, fabian socialists (Tony Blair), or neoliberals.

Small things and I don't mean to derail the thread but if researchers use misleading terminology it's automatically a hurdle to exposing the full truth.
They don't intend it for themselves...they intend it for the masses. They don't include themselves with you and I. They are demagogues working together to manipulate the masses to their objectives. OF COURSE THEY DON'T WANT THIS FOR THEMSELVES! JUST LOOK AT ANY DICTATORS FROM TIMES PAST...DID THEY LIVE UNDER THE SAME OPPRESSION OF THE PEOPLE? OF COURSE NOT!!!
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,812

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,812
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,586
They don't intend it for themselves...they intend it for the masses. They don't include themselves with you and I. They are demagogues working together to manipulate the masses to their objectives. OF COURSE THEY DON'T WANT THIS FOR THEMSELVES! JUST LOOK AT ANY DICTATORS FROM TIMES PAST...DID THEY LIVE UNDER THE SAME OPPRESSION OF THE PEOPLE? OF COURSE NOT!!!
I agree with you, but to call Trudeau out on anything is futile, IMHO. It's just partisan politics, basically. Like the US, while there may be subtle differences between our two major political parties, they're taking their cues from other organisations and corporations. The Canadian Council of Canadians were the first to recognise this back in '13/14, as I do recall them stating some of what Harper implemented has basically stayed the same with the Liberals.

Add to the fact that neither the new Conservative leader, O'Toole, or Singh haven't called him out on anything Trudeau and his party have implement is a sign that they must be all in agreement with what they're doing. Jack Layton might have, but that's neither here nor there since he's passed. To date, it's only been grassroots organisations and some civil rights lawyers/leaders.

Therefore, while it might feel good for the moment, getting angry isn't going to help anything, but taking action, will.
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,812
I agree with you, but to call Trudeau out on anything is futile, IMHO. It's just partisan politics, basically. Like the US, while there may be subtle differences between our two major political parties, they're taking their cues from other organisations and corporations. The Canadian Council of Canadians were the first to recognise this back in '13/14, as I do recall them stating some of what Harper implemented has basically stayed the same with the Liberals.
I know this wasn't addressed to me OM, but I was the one who posted the Trudeau stuff so I'll answer this bit...I have said from the beginning that the right and left are two sides of the same coin. They are all owned.

I only brought up Trudeau because he is the current PM, and is working his damnedest to destroy Canada. I mean, its just so blatant. Even yesterday he pleaded with other G20 countries to accept the UN Biodiversity/Agenda 21 plan. If it were O'Toole, or Singh or anyone else, I would have called them out as well despite what side of the fence they sit on. Trudeau has just so much baggage and is such a terrible actor that he stands out above the rest.
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,812

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
2,021
I understand what you are saying in the traditional concept of communism, but Marx and communism were funded by the banksters. You can call him whatever you want, he's still a communist. The NWO is communism.

View attachment 42957

View attachment 42959

View attachment 42958

While I haven't read it, I'm aware of Sutton's trilogy on Wall Street investments.There's many podcasts reviewing their ties to the Bolsheviks. The recent video with Jay Dyer he explained how Julian Huxley and the other Fabians called Soviet Russia "an interesting experiment".

That knowledge, including the quote from Rockefeller, further reinforces what I'm saying: the psychotic elite don't care about communism or capitalism. They care about control. It's also proof that while they might try to call themselves such, the Soviet Union and China are not and never were communist. China is a techno-dictatorship that actually the elite would love to model the West on.

All the talk from US Republicans or even the alt-right at Bitchute about the boogeyman "socialists", "communists", and "Marxists" shows a somewhat juvenile understanding of history and geo-politics IMO. For some people concepts have to fit into tidy compartments to help direct their emotions somewhere tangible. Labeling Obama and Trudeau communists I find lol funny but I wouldn't go on forever debating the issue.

Again we're debating semantics. Communists or pretend communists is irrelevant as long as we identify their deviousness and unite to block them.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,586
I know this wasn't addressed to me OM, but I was the one who posted the Trudeau stuff so I'll answer this bit...I have said from the beginning that the right and left are two sides of the same coin. They are all owned.

I only brought up Trudeau because he is the current PM, and is working his damnedest to destroy Canada. I mean, its just so blatant. Even yesterday he pleaded with other G20 countries to accept the UN Biodiversity/Agenda 21 plan. If it were O'Toole, or Singh or anyone else, I would have called them out as well despite what side of the fence they sit on. Trudeau has just so much baggage and is such a terrible actor that he stands out above the rest.
Agreed. It just gets so pedestrian and base reading about partisan politics on a conspiracy website, especially in this thread when most political parties around the world are doing absolutely NOTHING for the people they're supposedly representing. From my perspective, the "left" and "right" paradigm does nothing to further any sort of real diagnosis and/or solution, as you can see it can go on for pages.

Again, just my perspective, this is a human rights issue and it's clear there are politicians who are not letting a "good crisis go to waste" gets clearer by the day, that's all.
 

Helioform

Star
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
3,195
The right might be controlled to some extent but at least they do not support nonsense like Critical Race Theory, Cultural Marxism, Eco-Terrorism, hatred of landlords and gun owners, hatred of individuality and private property etc. so I really don't care if it might seem "juvenile" to call out the far left in all of this. All the so called right-leaning parties in Canada have become very left-leaning and that includes the Tories and OToole who support the Paris Accord and other UN related projects.
 
Top