COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

Orwell's mentor

Orwell's mentor

Star
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,868
Frank Badfinger said:
It seems that these governments are making up their own rules.
As if CV-1984 trumps all rights and freedoms.
We must get the word out right now!!
Click to expand...
Agreed. However, they bank on peoples' naïvety and ignorance. I mean, when's the last time did we have to remind ourselves that there are the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I knew of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights, but I had no idea there was an international version too.
 
Frank Badfinger

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,169
Orwell's mentor said:
Agreed. However, they bank on peoples' naïvety and ignorance. I mean, when's the last time did we have to remind ourselves that there are the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I knew of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights, but I had no idea there was an international version too.
Click to expand...
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights come from the United Nations. The very same U.N. that was formed with the sole purpose to create a one world government. I believe it's all lip service.
 
Orwell's mentor

Orwell's mentor

Star
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,868
Frank Badfinger said:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights come from the United Nations. The very same U.N. that was formed with the sole purpose to create a one world government. I believe it's all lip service.
Click to expand...
I agree with both you and @Lurker as it was created by the Rothschild's, however, they have been created and can be referenced. Not sure, what countries were responsible for devising them, but they are there. Much like how there are many countries that know Israel is constantly breaking International Law, but because the US has veto power for anything that's brought forward, they're NEVER held accountable.
 
Last edited:
Orwell's mentor

Orwell's mentor

Star
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,868
Frank Badfinger said:
If I remember correctly. Even the Canadian Charter of Human Rights can be revoked by the current government.
Click to expand...
Parts of it can such as using Section 33, the Notwithstanding Clause from what I see here:

www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, or simply the Charter, is the most visible and recognized part of Canada’s Constitution. The Charter guarantees the rights...
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

That may be why our current provincial gov't is trying to implement Bill 195, which would probably override an individual's democratic, mobility or language rights. I haven't read the bill but if a Conservative MPP got booted and kicked out of the party after the second reading because she thought it was overreaching, I'm going to make the assumption, it's not a bill in the public's favour.
 
Frank Badfinger

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,169
Orwell's mentor said:
Parts of it can such as using Section 33, the Notwithstanding Clause from what I see here:

www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, or simply the Charter, is the most visible and recognized part of Canada’s Constitution. The Charter guarantees the rights...
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

That may be why our current provincial gov't is trying to implement Bill 195, which would probably override an individual's democratic, mobility or language rights. I haven't read the bill but if a Conservative MPP got booted and kicked out of the party after the second reading because she thought it was overreaching, I'm going to make the assumption, it's not a bill in the public's favour.
Click to expand...
This is interesting.

Bill 195: The End of Democracy in Ontario Act

It seems odd then that this legislation comes when Ontario is moving further and further into its reopening phases as this pandemic winds down.
libertarian.on.ca libertarian.on.ca
 
Orwell's mentor

Orwell's mentor

Star
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,868
Frank Badfinger said:
This is interesting.

Bill 195: The End of Democracy in Ontario Act

It seems odd then that this legislation comes when Ontario is moving further and further into its reopening phases as this pandemic winds down.
libertarian.on.ca libertarian.on.ca
Click to expand...
If this is implemented, I'm sure they'll be more lawsuits against the provincial gov't and I would hazard a guess that once the suits are brought before the courts, the Conservatives know they won't in power, which is why they've only extended the bill for the next two years as the next election is June '22.

It's a power grab, plain and simple. I suppose we should expect nothing less from a grade 10 drug dealing dropout of a Premier.
 
D

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
2,159
Orwell's mentor said:
I agree with both you and @Lurker as it was created by the Rothschild's, however, they have been created and can be referenced. Not sure, what countries were responsible for devising them, but they are there. Much like how there are many countries that know Israel is constantly breaking International Law, but because the US has veto power for anything that's brought forward, they're NEVER held accountable.
Click to expand...
You've probably heard my spiel before but I believe there are fundamental qualities of the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights that were necessary to establish a groundwork for humane treatment and peaceful resolution to conflicts after WW2. Excluding the Economic and Social Council, the 5 main organs of the UN are reasonable. What most don't understand is that the dozens of "specialized agencies" (UNESCO, WHO, IMF, WTO, etc.) are autonomous and coordinate with the UN only by agreement.I guess it's splitting hairs at to what the entire organization has come to represent but I still note the distinction.

Anyways the reality is our governments are legally bound by these agreements. I've heard activists say there is a recourse in appealing to international law in defense of human rights. Obviously we'd need someone who can navigate that field to make a clear case but even a layperson can observe that the authorities are treading on legal thin ice with medical mandates, shuttering religious gatherings, blocking free travel, etc. Another thing: there are legal requirements to claiming a national emergency, i.e. "preserving the life of the nation". It's why we see our leaders so desperate to cling to exaggeration instead of scientific data.

I think this was the argument I heard to decline their vaccines:

https://www.refworld.org/docid/4672bc122.html

D . Non-derogable rights

58 . No State party shall, even in time of emergency threatening the life of the nation, derogate from the Covenant's guarantees of the right to life ; freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and from medical or scientific experimentation without free consent ; freedom from slavery or involuntary servitude ; the right not to be imprisoned for contractual debt ; the right not to be convicted or sentenced to a heavier penalty by virtue of retroactive criminal legislation ; the right to recognition as a person befor e the law ; and freedom of thought, conscience and religion . These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation .
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top