Bent8484
Established
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2020
- Messages
- 351
Initially, they had said that the fire brought it down, then some firefighters told the press that the building had to be "pulled" to contain the fire, and then the official story went back to the fire having brought the building down without assistance. The thing is... there's a radio recording out there (which I heard years ago, but couldn't find when I looked a couple years back) of the firefighters being evacuated before the building is taken down, so the official story is suspect already. I always wondered what the big deal was, why they couldn't just say it was demolished for safety reasons...why the denial, knowing that there's material evidence to the contrary in the public domain? It never sat right with me...I feel like I'm missing part of the picture.It was strange how planes brought down the two towers but nothing brought down that building and the press didn’t think anything of it. Which they do that..and move on and I guess we all do too at that point but I always wondered how that building came down too.
Last edited: