- Jul 12, 2022
That's just the thing, this tends to happen all the time, especially in Hollywood. The left always attack each other constantly, and contradict themselves, especially with the gay pride.I guess she doesnt believe that young homosexual men are often groomed and taken advantage of by old homosexual men. Isnt that the leftist narrative? How these youth are so much more vulnerable than straight people? But i guess when it conveniences them the narrative changes.
This! Raising kids is a job in itself. How are we suppose to do both? If women can, they don't have time for anything and they are always tired. I know that some women want to work, but it's not for everyone. And they always shame those that want kids!DON'T WANT THE ADDED STRESS OF A JOB while having young kids, which i want.
That is very true! It just goes to show we can still have them up to our mid 40s, just around there, there could be some complications with the birth, but like you said, women would have their last child at this point. I believe when men say they only want women in their 20s because they are more fertile is definitely an excuse to be a total perv. We are not damaged goods in our 30s and 40s!Even back in the old pre-feminism days women had kids up into their 40s, it was just usually their 5th kid or so at least.
But they keep moving the goalposts and "infertile" then means not able to have 8 kids of something, of course them assuming that the woman wants that many also. But if she doesnt she must be a feminist because everybody KNOWS all women want enough kids to fill up a sports team!
Both sides are so illogical, thats all i have to say
Hahahah this is very true. Seems most don't see that middle ground is most logical. It would be too difficult to have that many kids! Can we imagine trying to keep tabs on them and taking care of them! Let alone feeding them lol! There's nothing wrong with having a couple kids or so and there's nothing wrong with not wanting too many XD