TempestOfTempo
Superstar
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,689
If hes WEF... we know he is in too deep to be anything other than a problem.since We've been discussing texas here
I'm posting this here
all feathers on the same bird
If hes WEF... we know he is in too deep to be anything other than a problem.since We've been discussing texas here
I'm posting this here
all feathers on the same bird
that much We should agree on,anyone apart of the clubIf hes WEF... we know he is in too deep to be anything other than a problem.
I figured Red Queen would be pumped up about this!what a Beautiful sight
live feed of the Freedom rally 2nd anniversary
I am so pumped up for it lol I Love it,such a Beautiful sightI figured Red Queen would be pumped up about this!
PREACH!what the actual heck does gender have to do with removing
land mines?
this is why Peoples that are in the west get mad,all this money
seems to be unlimited and available until it's needed for the Peoples
already living in Our countries
that's how they get the division between Peoples here and Peoples
who're coming here
We have to start directing Our anger at those evils it should be directed
at and stop allowing them to divide Us
Canada Announces 'Gender-Inclusive' Landmine Removal Initiative for Ukraine
The Canadian government, however, did not mention "trans-inclusive tomahawk missiles."resistthemainstream.com
I read Matt Taibbi's piece on this and i was struck by the similarity to the arguments used in trying to get the UK bill passed(hiding behind kids). I couldn't help but wonder whether a single entity wrote both bills, then again, both countries already had Nudge Units/Behavioral Insight Teams ensconced within the gov'ts in preparation for the covid psyop. I don't think they'd clog up the courts, they'll simply deduct your (hate speech) antisemitism fine/penalty directly from your digital wallet until you get fed up and "get in line".Try as they might, but if the law doesn't have Royal Assent, it's basically meaningless. As the Canadian Bill of Rights states the following:
"(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
(b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law;
(c) freedom of religion;
(d) freedom of speech;
(e) freedom of assembly and association; and
(f) freedom of the press."
(source)
As Rebecca Sheppard stated in a video from Stand4thee.com, when going to court to fight the covid lockdown cases, it's best to quote to the Bill of Rights because the judge can easily not rule in an individual's favour if an individual wants to claim protection under the Canadian Charter of Rights because it does NOT have Royal Assent, which means the judge can easily overrule an individual's defense. However, if an individual can prove that their basic rights have been revoked the CBoR, there's not much wiggle room for being charged.
Granted, they may charge people with alleged hate crimes and clog up our court system with useless cases to fight "antisemitism" provided the bill actually becomes law, but I'm not sure how it would hold up in court.