First, wood doesn't melt at all, it combusts. Second, it's likely that a tire melting into a slab of metal was the result of a car-fire. If a car catches on fire, all the gasoline and oil in that car will catch fire as well, as well as all the material within, resulting in quite the dramatic, high-heat blaze. If you set a car on fire with a match, and that fire spreads throughout the vehicle, it will result in melted aluminum and tires.
The embers contribute a lot to this phenomenon as well. Embers dont spread in a uniform pattern so the fires can destroy a property completely while the adjacent property remains relatively unscathed.I also just watched the 'Mr. Asshole' video at the beginning, and I gotta ask: what does this nasally voiced kid, who sounds about 19, actually know about fires? Or direct-energy weapons? He keeps saying things like 'This doesn't look like a natural wildfire to me!' 'These certainly look like direct energy attacks to me!' ok, but... who the fuck are you? He's talking about the fires hitting some houses and not others, and zooms in on one specific example, but even in the example you can see the scorch-trails in the grass leading up to the house around the pool, as well as a couple of charred trees nearby. Fires ARE selective, in that not everything burns as well as everything else. If, for example, you've been ingoring drought advisories and have a well watered lawn with well watered trees, fire is FAR less likely to spread into your property, as there's no efficient fuel for it to follow. Building materials of houses are also a factor.
To use nature as an example:
Here's the aftermath of a wildfire in the middle of a forest. Everything in that forest was technically fuel for the fire, and yet everything was not consumed; the fire not spreading in some all-consuming wave. Whole veins of forest with blazes on all sides none the less survived unburned. If a fire surrounded by dense-packed trees can be this selective, a fire spreading through the streets of California would surely be moreso. Keep in mind that Wildfires don't have to spread directly; they put fuck-tons of embers in the air, these embers get blown around and land elsewhere, starting fires of their own, which would also result in selective burn-sites.
Ah, good point. Hadn't thought about that. And so, the list of variables gets longer lol. Still, knowing what I know about HAARP/weather modification/etc, I hesitate having a firm opinion on this. To what extent is this actually a natural phenomenon? We'll probably never know.
That's wise. Again, I'm not saying I know for a fact these fires were natural, I'm no wildfire expert myself, I just think its prudent not to leap to any out-there conclusions based on the theorizing of young youtubers who're far from experts, and are clearly leaping to conclusions themselves with minimal evidence.
Agreed. Its a strange world out there that we (still) know very little about.
Yep, PG&E...... Pacific Gas & Energy
Welcome to the brave new transworld.
ill pray for you bye
You made it sound like someone in authority had admitted something. The video is almost unwatchable.Is that a joke? The newscaster that appears at 4;00
Not really. That lady was from Fox news so take with a grain of salt anyways. But sometimes the news gives important info in plain sight, like predictive programming. But this is just straight out telling you what they are capable of.
