"Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children."While I am totally not pro-vaccine by any stretch of the imagination, this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that. It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children. He actually might be right about that when it comes to third world countries such as in Africa where malnutrition is very prevalent. But then again, he might not: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 And certainly in the United States, it appears that higher vaccination coverage is associated with higher infant mortality rates: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 Also, 33 countries have lower infant mortality rates than the United States, and when IMRs in these countries and the US are regressed against number of vaccine doses in the standard immunization schedules for these countries, "a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates" was found: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
I'm still trying to wrap my head around that logic. Wouldn't having more surviving children actually increase the population in the long run?It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children
But so long as we are seeking truth and willing to stand up for it and other people..... so long as we are willing to speak truth to power..... the game is still on!What a terrible existence we have, never knowing who is telling the truth, who is trying to help or hurt us, etc. It's an abomination, the entire thing.
LOL not suprisedPro-vaccine media goes full conspiracy theory; claims “the Russians” are running anti-vaccine campaigns to try to kill off America with measles
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-08-23-pro-vaccine-media-goes-full-conspiracy-theory-claims-russians-anti-vaccine-kill-america-measles.html
My thoughts exactly.it was a Freudian slip. He said what he Really Meant, IMO
you definitely may be right. but it's more fun to say he did hahaY’all can think whatever you want, but here are the facts:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1670537/
https://www.ageing.ox.ac.uk/download/143
https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/cdewp/96-27.pdf
It’s a legitimate theory. I’m just trying to help you guys out here. I once thought exactly the same thing about the Bill Gates quote, until someone kindly explained why I was wrong. Believe me, I’m not sitting here defending Bill Gates for his benefit. Bill Gates is a NWO douche.
Just thought I would share. This is disinformation. I think what you'll find useful is the following.While I am totally not pro-vaccine by any stretch of the imagination, this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that. It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children. He actually might be right about that when it comes to third world countries such as in Africa where malnutrition is very prevalent. But then again, he might not: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 And certainly in the United States, it appears that higher vaccination coverage is associated with higher infant mortality rates: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 Also, 33 countries have lower infant mortality rates than the United States, and when IMRs in these countries and the US are regressed against number of vaccine doses in the standard immunization schedules for these countries, "a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates" was found: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
What part of what I posted are you calling disinformation? The information you posted does not in any way contradict what I posted.This is disinformation.