Bill Gates admits vaccines are used for depopulation

umphreak

Established
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
126
While I am totally not pro-vaccine by any stretch of the imagination, this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that. It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children. He actually might be right about that when it comes to third world countries such as in Africa where malnutrition is very prevalent. But then again, he might not: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 And certainly in the United States, it appears that higher vaccination coverage is associated with higher infant mortality rates: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 Also, 33 countries have lower infant mortality rates than the United States, and when IMRs in these countries and the US are regressed against number of vaccine doses in the standard immunization schedules for these countries, "a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates" was found: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,061
While I am totally not pro-vaccine by any stretch of the imagination, this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that. It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children. He actually might be right about that when it comes to third world countries such as in Africa where malnutrition is very prevalent. But then again, he might not: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 And certainly in the United States, it appears that higher vaccination coverage is associated with higher infant mortality rates: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 Also, 33 countries have lower infant mortality rates than the United States, and when IMRs in these countries and the US are regressed against number of vaccine doses in the standard immunization schedules for these countries, "a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates" was found: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
"Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children."
That sounds like the Martin Lawrence stand up bit when he mentioned the crazy BF showing up in the club starting ish and dragging his lady out of there...... "Oh girl, hes just here because he heard there was a shootout at the club and he wanted to make sure we are safe!" lol
 

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children
I'm still trying to wrap my head around that logic. Wouldn't having more surviving children actually increase the population in the long run?
 

umphreak

Established
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
126
If you look at the data, you'll see that in richer countries with low infant mortality, women have fewer kids. Look at the average number of children born per woman in poor countries in Africa with high infant mortality, and you'll see that they have way more kids! I'm not saying I fully understand the mechanism at hand, but it's definitely true that in countries where more infants survive, people have fewer children. The graph below uses % of children who die before age 5 instead of infant mortality rates, which is not quite the same, but definitely demonstrates the relationship. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233807/

900px-Child_Mortality_vs_Fertility_Rate.svg.png
 

umphreak

Established
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
126
My point is that it's a well-established fact that there is a link and that as infant mortality rates decrease, so do birth rates. So what Bill Gates says in this video actually makes sense if you're aware of the actual data. It's not him admitting to anything. I'm not pro-vaccine or pro-Bill Gates by any stretch of the imagination, but whenever I see this particular clip being presented in this way, I always point out the facts. Because this is exactly the kind of thing that pro-vaccine folks point to when they want to make anti-vaccine folks look crazy and paranoid. If we are going to make a bold claim (such as that vaccines do more harm than good), we need to have an extremely high standard for evidence.
 

umphreak

Established
Joined
May 23, 2017
Messages
126

Devine

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,501
Y’all can think whatever you want, but here are the facts:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1670537/
https://www.ageing.ox.ac.uk/download/143
https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/cdewp/96-27.pdf

It’s a legitimate theory. I’m just trying to help you guys out here. I once thought exactly the same thing about the Bill Gates quote, until someone kindly explained why I was wrong. Believe me, I’m not sitting here defending Bill Gates for his benefit. Bill Gates is a NWO douche.
you definitely may be right. but it's more fun to say he did ;) haha
 

Glossolalien

Rookie
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
53
While I am totally not pro-vaccine by any stretch of the imagination, this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that. It is an accepted fact that when infant mortality is low in a given area, people have fewer children. Bill Gates was saying that high vaccine coverage in areas with high infant mortality will reduce infant mortality, thereby reducing the future population because people there will have fewer children. He actually might be right about that when it comes to third world countries such as in Africa where malnutrition is very prevalent. But then again, he might not: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 And certainly in the United States, it appears that higher vaccination coverage is associated with higher infant mortality rates: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22531966 Also, 33 countries have lower infant mortality rates than the United States, and when IMRs in these countries and the US are regressed against number of vaccine doses in the standard immunization schedules for these countries, "a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates" was found: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
Just thought I would share. This is disinformation. I think what you'll find useful is the following.

"Dr. Peter Aaby is renowned for studying and promoting vaccines in Africa with over 300 published studies.113 In 2017, he published a study finding children vaccinated with DTP were 10 times more likely to die in the first 6 months of life than the unvaccinated.114 Dr. Aaby’s study therefore concluded that: “All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”115 More disturbing is that children vaccinated with DTP were dying from causes never associated with this vaccine, such as respiratory infections, diarrhea, and malaria.116 This indicated that while DTP reduced the incidence of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, it increased susceptibility to other infections. 117 "

http://icandecide.org/white-papers/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017.pdf

This is pretty straightforward. Those who promote and make money from these vaccines use entirely different studies and data sets by which decisions are made. Then evil men like George Bush get to brag about how much aid went to Africa. That money is spent on this.
 

Glossolalien

Rookie
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
53
Hi umphreak, this was mainly a reply to your first reply. I apologize that it didn't quote it as I expected.

Here's disinfo that you said, "this is actually NOT what Bill Gates (who I also am no fan of) meant when he said that."

You are pretending to know the mind of a eugenicist. You are ascribing meaning and intent to words that are intended to mislead. He was basing his statement off of the data that I linked and not the data[that I'll show is opposite your whole point] that you linked. Do you really presume to know his meaning but also claim to "not be a fan?"

I highly doubt it. Especially when the data I linked indicated that more children die as a result of vaccines.
 

Devine

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,501
whether or not vaccines kill people has nothing to do really with whether gates made a slip cause he Thinks vax kill ppl...
 
Top