- Mar 15, 2017
So because the medical system supports the murder of unborn children, it is OK for Anthony John Hill to support euthanasia via medical negligence?!!! That is a shocking case of whataboutery.On the subject of "eugenics", since humans are looking at that too upside down and backwards, as they always do.
There are reportedly tens of millions of induced abortions annually. Every single piece of man-made legislation allowing "legal" abortion is actually legalizing murder, which is a capital crime under God's Law.
The medical and pharmaceutical industries are also responsible for the deaths of tens of millions annually. The following link provides an admission of this fact, although it tries to cover it up as medical errors and overdoses.
Our prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. Around half of those who die have taken their drugs correctly; the other half die because of errors, such as too high a dose or use of a drug despite contraindications. Our...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
1. Whataboutery again. Medicines often have side-effects, especially when more than one is used at the same time. Sometimes they are serious ones, it doesn't mean medical negligence is justified via withholding potentially life-saving medicines.Vaccines, e.g. the Gardasil vaccine, are known to sterilize and/or cripple their victims, on top of murdering thousands and thousands of young women.
Euthanizing our elderly population through isolation in nursing homes and pharmacy is likewise a development of modern society, resulting in the suffering and premature deaths of millions.
2. People with serious conditions would die much earlier without drugs. FACT. Some previously fatal diseases are now chronic conditions BECAUSE of medications.
We now have so many people in nursing homes thanks to medicines. People in nursing homes are also safer because of medicines.
Some residents would seriously harm other residents and nursing staff if they didn't have sedatives etc!!!!
Wars have nothing to do with the uses of drugs, unless drugs are used to save lives.Wars are also "legalized" murder, and are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands every year, with that number experiencing an exponential rise during the two previous world wars, and the planned third world war, which is now imminent.
This is why you have so much mind-numbing text, to hide the teachings that people are likely to skim through in the process.God, Who is all-powerful and created both us (the spiritual-Beings) and the human animals that we temporarily incarnate, has a perfect system for keeping each species strong and viable: natural selection. Natural selection is simply the way nature weeds out the weak and crippled, so that the strongest hereditary traits are passed on to the next generation. It has absolutely nothing to do with Darwinism, which wrongly teaches that one species can somehow "evolve" into another species.
Your conclusion shows you admit that Anthony John Hill is in favour of natural selection.
AJH is anti-pharmacology, and sounds way more like a Word of Faith preacher than a Christian. However on this topic it is mostly pro-reincarnation, karma, and fatalism doctrines. On this topic he sounds way more like a Hindu or a Theosophist.