Another Perspective On Lgbtq

mecca

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
7,129
cuz its a preference. breh you dont go on sitting and reciting what color you like or what food you like. you just do
But that would mean it's not a choice since people can't choose what their taste buds will find good or what color their eyes gravitate towards either. It may be a preference but it's not necessarily choose-able.
 





williejonesjr

Veteran
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
906
I think child molestation also aides in one (potentially) becoming homosexual. As far as the victim is concerned.
This I believe.

R. Kelly recalled being molested as a child and after a while, he actually enjoyed how it felt, making him a hypersexual person.

While seeing gays, wearing pink or singing in musicals doesn't make one gay, consider the power of suggestion.

"Are you gay?"
"No."
"Are you sure?"
"I don't know"
"It won't hurt to find out... "

I'm not for the gay agenda. If someone's gay, they're gay. But sometimes ppl like being "controversial" or anti- establishment.
I used to know women who had numerous of make sexual partners & then decided to try women. All of a sudden, they were " gay". It only lasted until they got back together w their boyfriends.
 





Devin

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
2,661
How is it a new evolution of humans when LGBT is an extremely small portion of the population and they have existed since the beginning of humanity? There aren't more gay people now... there's just more out gay people.
well see i know that's true of gay people but trans? just not so sure it's that common, historically. and i definitely don't think it's as common as the media portrays as i wonder why?
honestly when obama marched out the bathroom bill i was bewildered, aren't there so many more urgent issues affecting much larger groups?
 





Devin

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
2,661
there are other known endochrine disrupters besides what she mentioned. BPA in plastics has been identified to increase estrogen in boys.
 





Devin

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
2,661
This I believe.

R. Kelly recalled being molested as a child and after a while, he actually enjoyed how it felt, making him a hypersexual person.

While seeing gays, wearing pink or singing in musicals doesn't make one gay, consider the power of suggestion.

"Are you gay?"
"No."
"Are you sure?"
"I don't know"
"It won't hurt to find out... "

I'm not for the gay agenda. If someone's gay, they're gay. But sometimes ppl like being "controversial" or anti- establishment.
I used to know women who had numerous of make sexual partners & then decided to try women. All of a sudden, they were " gay". It only lasted until they got back together w their boyfriends.
wow r kelly said that? did you see the video of lil wayne talking about being raped?
 





mecca

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
7,129
well see i know that's true of gay people but trans? just not so sure it's that common, historically
It is true, transgender people are just an even smaller portion of the population, and it's such a distinct feeling that people wouldn't say they were trans and get a drastic surgical operation unless they really were transgender. Just because it's being discussed more, doesn't mean more people are transgender.
and i definitely don't think it's as common as the media portrays
That's true.
i wonder why?
I don't know.
the bathroom bill... aren't there so many more urgent issues affecting much larger groups?
Yeah that was probably just a way to get people arguing and divided over a stupid topic, even transgender people thought everything was blown out of proportion.
 





rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
3,165
I have always kind of wondered whether there was a genetic alteration that was taking place and causing the increase in the occurrence of things like this kind of like this article is suggesting.

It is known that when the first polio vaccines were released, they contained cancer virus' for many years. It was called SV40. The New York Times even did an article acknowledging this. They say they basically can't trace the cause of cancer back to this point of origin.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/23/us/study-is-unsure-on-tainted-polio-vaccine-s-cancer-role.html

Cancer has existed for some time, but it is interesting that cancer has become such an epidemic and that there were so many more people being diagnosed with cancer beginning in the 1970's until today than there was throughout history.

We also know that they use virus' to genetically modify food because when a virus enters a host it is able to join a new piece of DNA in the process and this will be able to continue to replicate itself.

We also know that whether or not homosexuality existed in the past, it appears to be increasing and shapeshifting with people taking on a whole range of different gender associations and undergoing procedures to change genders.

I think it is possible that they know why people choose to be gay. If people make the argument that people are born this way, then there is a way to identify this within the genetic material otherwise it is a choice.

I don't personally think it is a choice. I think they can identify this and this piece of genetic information is being put in vaccines the same way Willy Wonka put the golden tickets in the chocolate bars. In theory, you could test a batch of vaccines and not identify this process because it only exists in one out of every thousand for example.

It is something like this that is increasing the occurrence of an otherwise natural phenomenon because it is clearly increasing, so there has to be a cause. It was not always like this. Society was not oppressing what we are seeing take place right now. I just don't think most people can truly consider their parents or grandparents generation and think that they feel they ever missed out because this sort of opportunity wasn't available to them. There is something different happening. Anyways, this is just my theory.
 





Fl-Fr-Fa

Established
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
309
I have always kind of wondered whether there was a genetic alteration that was taking place and causing the increase in the occurrence of things like this kind of like this article is suggesting.

It is known that when the first polio vaccines were released, they contained cancer virus' for many years. It was called SV40. The New York Times even did an article acknowledging this. They say they basically can't trace the cause of cancer back to this point of origin.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/23/us/study-is-unsure-on-tainted-polio-vaccine-s-cancer-role.html

Cancer has existed for some time, but it is interesting that cancer has become such an epidemic and that there were so many more people being diagnosed with cancer beginning in the 1970's until today than there was throughout history.

We also know that they use virus' to genetically modify food because when a virus enters a host it is able to join a new piece of DNA in the process and this will be able to continue to replicate itself.

We also know that whether or not homosexuality existed in the past, it appears to be increasing and shapeshifting with people taking on a whole range of different gender associations and undergoing procedures to change genders.

I think it is possible that they know why people choose to be gay. If people make the argument that people are born this way, then there is a way to identify this within the genetic material otherwise it is a choice.

I don't personally think it is a choice. I think they can identify this and this piece of genetic information is being put in vaccines the same way Willy Wonka put the golden tickets in the chocolate bars. In theory, you could test a batch of vaccines and not identify this process because it only exists in one out of every thousand for example.

It is something like this that is increasing the occurrence of an otherwise natural phenomenon because it is clearly increasing, so there has to be a cause. It was not always like this. Society was not oppressing what we are seeing take place right now. I just don't think most people can truly consider their parents or grandparents generation and think that they feel they ever missed out because this sort of opportunity wasn't available to them. There is something different happening. Anyways, this is just my theory.
I think very possibly that they are trying different scenarios to possibly target different genetics, hoping that at least some of it will stick. Or is it possible that they know more at this stage?, and so causing even more examples to happen. The truth will come out eventually, as the science [reasons] they are using it amongst us is likely mostly classified. Yes, these issues are happening more now and from my POV, we need to be a little careful with what is called normal now. I'm not talking from a PC standpoint [legislated kindness], but remembering, that they are human beings figuring out their experience as we are figuring out ours.:(
 





Aero

Star
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
3,840
Whats the real motive for all this stuff though? There can't be a real plan to depopulate us by making us gay. And there aren't many traditional values left to preserve. What I mean is, we are mostly all fine with the idea of War.

What destroys traditional values more? Gay people or War? My vote is war.
 





williejonesjr

Veteran
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
906
well see i know that's true of gay people but trans? just not so sure it's that common, historically. and i definitely don't think it's as common as the media portrays as i wonder why?
honestly when obama marched out the bathroom bill i was bewildered, aren't there so many more urgent issues affecting much larger groups?
Bathroom bill.
If you have a pecker, piss outside.
 





polymoog

Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
3,538
Whats the real motive for all this stuff though? There can't be a real plan to depopulate us by making us gay.
divide and conquer. another angle on it. atomizing the population based on religion, gender, etc., helps keep TPTB in control. the destruction of the nuclear family has been ongoing for awhile-- look at the "ecosexuals" and the "autosexuals", for example (TS and TG people can still have a close knit family).
the nuclear family has to be broken so that the individual becomes emotionally bonded to the government instead.
 





Fl-Fr-Fa

Established
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
309
divide and conquer. another angle on it. atomizing the population based on religion, gender, etc., helps keep TPTB in control. the destruction of the nuclear family has been ongoing for awhile-- look at the "ecosexuals" and the "autosexuals", for example (TS and TG people can still have a close knit family).
the nuclear family has to be broken so that the individual becomes emotionally bonded to the government instead.
I agree in large part.
Unfortunately I forget where I heard or read (if I find it, I'll post it), but to the effect that "gay behaviour" is not just gay people -- but it's considered any [sexual/psychological] behaviour that ends up with no procreation, or so the goal is for TPTB. So for example, being promiscuous like many are these days and if there are no babies being born --> bonus. Get your frustrations out/one-night stands/no commitment, etc. Sad, if that's the case as another piece which seems to fit into the global depopulation agenda.
 





Top